Cargando…
Developing Mixed Matrix Membranes with Good CO(2) Separation Performance Based on PEG-Modified UiO-66 MOF and 6FDA-Durene Polyimide
The use of mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) comprising metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) for the separation of CO(2) from flue gas has gained recognition as an effective strategy for enhancing gas separation efficiency. When incorporating porous materials like MOFs into a polymeric matrix to create MMMs,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10674161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38006167 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15224442 |
Sumario: | The use of mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) comprising metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) for the separation of CO(2) from flue gas has gained recognition as an effective strategy for enhancing gas separation efficiency. When incorporating porous materials like MOFs into a polymeric matrix to create MMMs, the combined characteristics of each constituent typically manifest. Nevertheless, the inadequate dispersion of an inorganic MOF filler within an organic polymer matrix can compromise the compatibility between the filler and matrix. In this context, the aspiration is to develop an MMM that not only exhibits optimal interfacial compatibility between the polymer and filler but also delivers superior gas separation performance, specifically in the efficient extraction of CO(2) from flue gas. In this study, we introduce a modification technique involving the grafting of poly(ethylene glycol) diglycidyl ether (PEGDE) onto a UiO-66-NH(2) MOF filler (referred to as PEG-MOF), aimed at enhancing its compatibility with the 6FDA-durene matrix. Moreover, the inherent CO(2)-philic nature of PEGDE is anticipated to enhance the selectivity of CO(2) over N(2) and CH(4). The resultant MMM, incorporating 10 wt% of PEG-MOF loading, exhibits a CO(2) permeability of 1671.00 Barrer and a CO(2)/CH(4) selectivity of 22.40. Notably, these values surpass the upper bound reported by Robeson in 2008. |
---|