Cargando…

Probiotics Partly Suppress the Impact of Sugar Stress on the Oral Microbiota—A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial

The aim was to test if probiotics counteract oral dysbiosis during 14 days of sugar stress and subsequently help restore oral homeostasis. Eighty healthy individuals received either probiotics (n = 40) or placebo lozenges (n = 40) for 28 days and rinsed with a 10% sucrose solution 6–8 times during t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lundtorp Olsen, Christine, Massarenti, Laura, Vendius, Vincent Frederik Dahl, Gürsoy, Ulvi Kahraman, Van Splunter, Annina, Bikker, Floris J., Gürsoy, Mervi, Damgaard, Christian, Markvart, Merete, Belstrøm, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10675525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38004205
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15224810
_version_ 1785149826952855552
author Lundtorp Olsen, Christine
Massarenti, Laura
Vendius, Vincent Frederik Dahl
Gürsoy, Ulvi Kahraman
Van Splunter, Annina
Bikker, Floris J.
Gürsoy, Mervi
Damgaard, Christian
Markvart, Merete
Belstrøm, Daniel
author_facet Lundtorp Olsen, Christine
Massarenti, Laura
Vendius, Vincent Frederik Dahl
Gürsoy, Ulvi Kahraman
Van Splunter, Annina
Bikker, Floris J.
Gürsoy, Mervi
Damgaard, Christian
Markvart, Merete
Belstrøm, Daniel
author_sort Lundtorp Olsen, Christine
collection PubMed
description The aim was to test if probiotics counteract oral dysbiosis during 14 days of sugar stress and subsequently help restore oral homeostasis. Eighty healthy individuals received either probiotics (n = 40) or placebo lozenges (n = 40) for 28 days and rinsed with a 10% sucrose solution 6–8 times during the initial 14 days of the trial. Saliva and supragingival samples were collected at baseline, day 14, and day 28. Saliva samples were analyzed for levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, albumin, and salivary enzyme activity. The supragingival microbiota was characterized according to the Human Oral Microbiome Database. After 14 days of sugar stress, the relative abundance of Porphyromonas species was significantly higher (p = 0.03) and remained significantly elevated at day 28 in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.004). At day 28, the relative abundance of Kingella species was significantly higher in the probiotic group (p = 0.03). Streptococcus gordinii and Neisseria elongata were associated with the probiotic group on day 28, while Streptococcus sobrinus was associated with the placebo group on day 14 and day 28. On day 28, the salivary albumin level was significantly lower in the probiotic group. The present study demonstrates a potential stabilizing effect on the supragingival microbiota mediated by consumption of probiotics during short-term sugar stress.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10675525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106755252023-11-17 Probiotics Partly Suppress the Impact of Sugar Stress on the Oral Microbiota—A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial Lundtorp Olsen, Christine Massarenti, Laura Vendius, Vincent Frederik Dahl Gürsoy, Ulvi Kahraman Van Splunter, Annina Bikker, Floris J. Gürsoy, Mervi Damgaard, Christian Markvart, Merete Belstrøm, Daniel Nutrients Article The aim was to test if probiotics counteract oral dysbiosis during 14 days of sugar stress and subsequently help restore oral homeostasis. Eighty healthy individuals received either probiotics (n = 40) or placebo lozenges (n = 40) for 28 days and rinsed with a 10% sucrose solution 6–8 times during the initial 14 days of the trial. Saliva and supragingival samples were collected at baseline, day 14, and day 28. Saliva samples were analyzed for levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, albumin, and salivary enzyme activity. The supragingival microbiota was characterized according to the Human Oral Microbiome Database. After 14 days of sugar stress, the relative abundance of Porphyromonas species was significantly higher (p = 0.03) and remained significantly elevated at day 28 in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group (p = 0.004). At day 28, the relative abundance of Kingella species was significantly higher in the probiotic group (p = 0.03). Streptococcus gordinii and Neisseria elongata were associated with the probiotic group on day 28, while Streptococcus sobrinus was associated with the placebo group on day 14 and day 28. On day 28, the salivary albumin level was significantly lower in the probiotic group. The present study demonstrates a potential stabilizing effect on the supragingival microbiota mediated by consumption of probiotics during short-term sugar stress. MDPI 2023-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10675525/ /pubmed/38004205 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15224810 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lundtorp Olsen, Christine
Massarenti, Laura
Vendius, Vincent Frederik Dahl
Gürsoy, Ulvi Kahraman
Van Splunter, Annina
Bikker, Floris J.
Gürsoy, Mervi
Damgaard, Christian
Markvart, Merete
Belstrøm, Daniel
Probiotics Partly Suppress the Impact of Sugar Stress on the Oral Microbiota—A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial
title Probiotics Partly Suppress the Impact of Sugar Stress on the Oral Microbiota—A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial
title_full Probiotics Partly Suppress the Impact of Sugar Stress on the Oral Microbiota—A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Probiotics Partly Suppress the Impact of Sugar Stress on the Oral Microbiota—A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Probiotics Partly Suppress the Impact of Sugar Stress on the Oral Microbiota—A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial
title_short Probiotics Partly Suppress the Impact of Sugar Stress on the Oral Microbiota—A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial
title_sort probiotics partly suppress the impact of sugar stress on the oral microbiota—a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10675525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38004205
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu15224810
work_keys_str_mv AT lundtorpolsenchristine probioticspartlysuppresstheimpactofsugarstressontheoralmicrobiotaarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT massarentilaura probioticspartlysuppresstheimpactofsugarstressontheoralmicrobiotaarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT vendiusvincentfrederikdahl probioticspartlysuppresstheimpactofsugarstressontheoralmicrobiotaarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT gursoyulvikahraman probioticspartlysuppresstheimpactofsugarstressontheoralmicrobiotaarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT vansplunterannina probioticspartlysuppresstheimpactofsugarstressontheoralmicrobiotaarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT bikkerflorisj probioticspartlysuppresstheimpactofsugarstressontheoralmicrobiotaarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT gursoymervi probioticspartlysuppresstheimpactofsugarstressontheoralmicrobiotaarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT damgaardchristian probioticspartlysuppresstheimpactofsugarstressontheoralmicrobiotaarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT markvartmerete probioticspartlysuppresstheimpactofsugarstressontheoralmicrobiotaarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial
AT belstrømdaniel probioticspartlysuppresstheimpactofsugarstressontheoralmicrobiotaarandomizeddoubleblindedplacebocontrolledtrial