Cargando…

The Effectiveness of a Mechanical Ventilation System for Indoor PM(2.5) in Residential Houses

The mechanical ventilation systems used in houses are designed to reduce carbon dioxide emissions while minimizing the energy loss resulting from ventilation. However, the increase in indoor fine particulate (PM(2.5)) concentration because of external PM(2.5) influx through the ventilation system po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Dongho, Kim, Younghun, Hong, Kee-Jung, Lee, Gunhee, Park, Inyong, Kim, Hak-Joon, Kim, Sangwoo, Hwang, Cheong-Ha, Noh, Kwang-Chul, Han, Bangwoo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10675534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37999564
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics11110912
_version_ 1785141087666438144
author Shin, Dongho
Kim, Younghun
Hong, Kee-Jung
Lee, Gunhee
Park, Inyong
Kim, Hak-Joon
Kim, Sangwoo
Hwang, Cheong-Ha
Noh, Kwang-Chul
Han, Bangwoo
author_facet Shin, Dongho
Kim, Younghun
Hong, Kee-Jung
Lee, Gunhee
Park, Inyong
Kim, Hak-Joon
Kim, Sangwoo
Hwang, Cheong-Ha
Noh, Kwang-Chul
Han, Bangwoo
author_sort Shin, Dongho
collection PubMed
description The mechanical ventilation systems used in houses are designed to reduce carbon dioxide emissions while minimizing the energy loss resulting from ventilation. However, the increase in indoor fine particulate (PM(2.5)) concentration because of external PM(2.5) influx through the ventilation system poses a problem. Here, we analyzed the changes in indoor PM(2.5) concentration, distinguishing between cases of high and low outdoor PM(2.5) concentrations and considering the efficiency of the filters used in residential mechanical ventilation systems. When using filters with the minimum efficiency reporting value (MERV) of 10 in the ventilation system, the outdoor PM(2.5) concentration was 5 μg/m³; compared to the initial concentration, the indoor PM(2.5) concentration after 60 min decreased to 73%. When the outdoor PM(2.5) concentration was 30–40 μg/m³, the indoor PM(2.5) concentration reached 91%. However, when MERV 13 filters were used, the indoor PM(2.5) concentration consistently dropped to 73–76%, regardless of the outdoor PM(2.5) concentration. Furthermore, by comparing the established equation with the mass balance model, the error was confirmed to be within 5%, indicating a good fit. This allows for the prediction of indoor PM(2.5) under various conditions when using mechanical ventilation systems, enabling the formulation of strategies for maintaining indoor PM(2.5), as recommended by the World Health Organization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10675534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106755342023-11-07 The Effectiveness of a Mechanical Ventilation System for Indoor PM(2.5) in Residential Houses Shin, Dongho Kim, Younghun Hong, Kee-Jung Lee, Gunhee Park, Inyong Kim, Hak-Joon Kim, Sangwoo Hwang, Cheong-Ha Noh, Kwang-Chul Han, Bangwoo Toxics Article The mechanical ventilation systems used in houses are designed to reduce carbon dioxide emissions while minimizing the energy loss resulting from ventilation. However, the increase in indoor fine particulate (PM(2.5)) concentration because of external PM(2.5) influx through the ventilation system poses a problem. Here, we analyzed the changes in indoor PM(2.5) concentration, distinguishing between cases of high and low outdoor PM(2.5) concentrations and considering the efficiency of the filters used in residential mechanical ventilation systems. When using filters with the minimum efficiency reporting value (MERV) of 10 in the ventilation system, the outdoor PM(2.5) concentration was 5 μg/m³; compared to the initial concentration, the indoor PM(2.5) concentration after 60 min decreased to 73%. When the outdoor PM(2.5) concentration was 30–40 μg/m³, the indoor PM(2.5) concentration reached 91%. However, when MERV 13 filters were used, the indoor PM(2.5) concentration consistently dropped to 73–76%, regardless of the outdoor PM(2.5) concentration. Furthermore, by comparing the established equation with the mass balance model, the error was confirmed to be within 5%, indicating a good fit. This allows for the prediction of indoor PM(2.5) under various conditions when using mechanical ventilation systems, enabling the formulation of strategies for maintaining indoor PM(2.5), as recommended by the World Health Organization. MDPI 2023-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10675534/ /pubmed/37999564 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics11110912 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Shin, Dongho
Kim, Younghun
Hong, Kee-Jung
Lee, Gunhee
Park, Inyong
Kim, Hak-Joon
Kim, Sangwoo
Hwang, Cheong-Ha
Noh, Kwang-Chul
Han, Bangwoo
The Effectiveness of a Mechanical Ventilation System for Indoor PM(2.5) in Residential Houses
title The Effectiveness of a Mechanical Ventilation System for Indoor PM(2.5) in Residential Houses
title_full The Effectiveness of a Mechanical Ventilation System for Indoor PM(2.5) in Residential Houses
title_fullStr The Effectiveness of a Mechanical Ventilation System for Indoor PM(2.5) in Residential Houses
title_full_unstemmed The Effectiveness of a Mechanical Ventilation System for Indoor PM(2.5) in Residential Houses
title_short The Effectiveness of a Mechanical Ventilation System for Indoor PM(2.5) in Residential Houses
title_sort effectiveness of a mechanical ventilation system for indoor pm(2.5) in residential houses
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10675534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37999564
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics11110912
work_keys_str_mv AT shindongho theeffectivenessofamechanicalventilationsystemforindoorpm25inresidentialhouses
AT kimyounghun theeffectivenessofamechanicalventilationsystemforindoorpm25inresidentialhouses
AT hongkeejung theeffectivenessofamechanicalventilationsystemforindoorpm25inresidentialhouses
AT leegunhee theeffectivenessofamechanicalventilationsystemforindoorpm25inresidentialhouses
AT parkinyong theeffectivenessofamechanicalventilationsystemforindoorpm25inresidentialhouses
AT kimhakjoon theeffectivenessofamechanicalventilationsystemforindoorpm25inresidentialhouses
AT kimsangwoo theeffectivenessofamechanicalventilationsystemforindoorpm25inresidentialhouses
AT hwangcheongha theeffectivenessofamechanicalventilationsystemforindoorpm25inresidentialhouses
AT nohkwangchul theeffectivenessofamechanicalventilationsystemforindoorpm25inresidentialhouses
AT hanbangwoo theeffectivenessofamechanicalventilationsystemforindoorpm25inresidentialhouses
AT shindongho effectivenessofamechanicalventilationsystemforindoorpm25inresidentialhouses
AT kimyounghun effectivenessofamechanicalventilationsystemforindoorpm25inresidentialhouses
AT hongkeejung effectivenessofamechanicalventilationsystemforindoorpm25inresidentialhouses
AT leegunhee effectivenessofamechanicalventilationsystemforindoorpm25inresidentialhouses
AT parkinyong effectivenessofamechanicalventilationsystemforindoorpm25inresidentialhouses
AT kimhakjoon effectivenessofamechanicalventilationsystemforindoorpm25inresidentialhouses
AT kimsangwoo effectivenessofamechanicalventilationsystemforindoorpm25inresidentialhouses
AT hwangcheongha effectivenessofamechanicalventilationsystemforindoorpm25inresidentialhouses
AT nohkwangchul effectivenessofamechanicalventilationsystemforindoorpm25inresidentialhouses
AT hanbangwoo effectivenessofamechanicalventilationsystemforindoorpm25inresidentialhouses