Cargando…

Escitalopram versus other antidepressive agents for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Escitalopram is selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and one of the most commonly prescribed newer antidepressants (ADs) worldwide. We aimed to explore the efficacy, acceptability and tolerability of escitalopram in comparison with other ADs in the acute-phase treatment of maj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yin, Juntao, Song, Xiaoyong, Wang, Chaoyang, Lin, Xuhong, Miao, Mingsan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10675869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38001423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05382-8
_version_ 1785149864801206272
author Yin, Juntao
Song, Xiaoyong
Wang, Chaoyang
Lin, Xuhong
Miao, Mingsan
author_facet Yin, Juntao
Song, Xiaoyong
Wang, Chaoyang
Lin, Xuhong
Miao, Mingsan
author_sort Yin, Juntao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Escitalopram is selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and one of the most commonly prescribed newer antidepressants (ADs) worldwide. We aimed to explore the efficacy, acceptability and tolerability of escitalopram in comparison with other ADs in the acute-phase treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Clinical Trials.gov were searched from inception to July 10, 2023. Trial databases of drug-approving agencies were hand-searched for published, unpublished and ongoing controlled trials. All randomized controlled trials comparing escitalopram against any other antidepressant for patients with MDD. Responders and remitters to treatment were calculated on an intention-to-treat basis. For dichotomous data, risk ratios (RRs) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Continuous data were analyzed using standardized mean differences (with 95% CI) using the random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 30 studies were included in this meta‑analysis, among which sixteen trials compared escitalopram with another SSRI and 14 compared escitalopram with a newer AD. Escitalopram was shown to be significantly more effective than citalopram in achieving acute response (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50—0.87). Escitalopram was also more effective than citalopram in terms of remission (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30—0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Escitalopram was superior to other ADs for the acute phase treatment of MDD in terms of efficacy, acceptability and tolerability. However, no significant difference was found between escitalopram and other ADs in early response or follow-up response to treatment of MDD. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-023-05382-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10675869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106758692023-11-24 Escitalopram versus other antidepressive agents for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis Yin, Juntao Song, Xiaoyong Wang, Chaoyang Lin, Xuhong Miao, Mingsan BMC Psychiatry Research BACKGROUND: Escitalopram is selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and one of the most commonly prescribed newer antidepressants (ADs) worldwide. We aimed to explore the efficacy, acceptability and tolerability of escitalopram in comparison with other ADs in the acute-phase treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Clinical Trials.gov were searched from inception to July 10, 2023. Trial databases of drug-approving agencies were hand-searched for published, unpublished and ongoing controlled trials. All randomized controlled trials comparing escitalopram against any other antidepressant for patients with MDD. Responders and remitters to treatment were calculated on an intention-to-treat basis. For dichotomous data, risk ratios (RRs) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Continuous data were analyzed using standardized mean differences (with 95% CI) using the random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 30 studies were included in this meta‑analysis, among which sixteen trials compared escitalopram with another SSRI and 14 compared escitalopram with a newer AD. Escitalopram was shown to be significantly more effective than citalopram in achieving acute response (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50—0.87). Escitalopram was also more effective than citalopram in terms of remission (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30—0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Escitalopram was superior to other ADs for the acute phase treatment of MDD in terms of efficacy, acceptability and tolerability. However, no significant difference was found between escitalopram and other ADs in early response or follow-up response to treatment of MDD. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-023-05382-8. BioMed Central 2023-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10675869/ /pubmed/38001423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05382-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Yin, Juntao
Song, Xiaoyong
Wang, Chaoyang
Lin, Xuhong
Miao, Mingsan
Escitalopram versus other antidepressive agents for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Escitalopram versus other antidepressive agents for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Escitalopram versus other antidepressive agents for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Escitalopram versus other antidepressive agents for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Escitalopram versus other antidepressive agents for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Escitalopram versus other antidepressive agents for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort escitalopram versus other antidepressive agents for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10675869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38001423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05382-8
work_keys_str_mv AT yinjuntao escitalopramversusotherantidepressiveagentsformajordepressivedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT songxiaoyong escitalopramversusotherantidepressiveagentsformajordepressivedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangchaoyang escitalopramversusotherantidepressiveagentsformajordepressivedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linxuhong escitalopramversusotherantidepressiveagentsformajordepressivedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT miaomingsan escitalopramversusotherantidepressiveagentsformajordepressivedisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis