Cargando…
Spatial mapping of tumor heterogeneity in whole-body PET–CT: a feasibility study
BACKGROUND: Tumor heterogeneity is recognized as a predictor of treatment response and patient outcome. Quantification of tumor heterogeneity across all scales may therefore provide critical insight that ultimately improves cancer management. METHODS: An image registration-based framework for the st...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10675915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38007471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-023-01173-0 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Tumor heterogeneity is recognized as a predictor of treatment response and patient outcome. Quantification of tumor heterogeneity across all scales may therefore provide critical insight that ultimately improves cancer management. METHODS: An image registration-based framework for the study of tumor heterogeneity in whole-body images was evaluated on a dataset of 490 FDG-PET–CT images of lung cancer, lymphoma, and melanoma patients. Voxel-, lesion- and subject-level features were extracted from the subjects’ segmented lesion masks and mapped to female and male template spaces for voxel-wise analysis. Resulting lesion feature maps of the three subsets of cancer patients were studied visually and quantitatively. Lesion volumes and lesion distances in subject spaces were compared with resulting properties in template space. The strength of the association between subject and template space for these properties was evaluated with Pearson’s correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Spatial heterogeneity in terms of lesion frequency distribution in the body, metabolic activity, and lesion volume was seen between the three subsets of cancer patients. Lesion feature maps showed anatomical locations with low versus high mean feature value among lesions sampled in space and also highlighted sites with high variation between lesions in each cancer subset. Spatial properties of the lesion masks in subject space correlated strongly with the same properties measured in template space (lesion volume, R = 0.986, p < 0.001; total metabolic volume, R = 0.988, p < 0.001; maximum within-patient lesion distance, R = 0.997, p < 0.001). Lesion volume and total metabolic volume increased on average from subject to template space (lesion volume, 3.1 ± 52 ml; total metabolic volume, 53.9 ± 229 ml). Pair-wise lesion distance decreased on average by 0.1 ± 1.6 cm and maximum within-patient lesion distance increased on average by 0.5 ± 2.1 cm from subject to template space. CONCLUSIONS: Spatial tumor heterogeneity between subsets of interest in cancer cohorts can successfully be explored in whole-body PET–CT images within the proposed framework. Whole-body studies are, however, especially prone to suffer from regional variation in lesion frequency, and thus statistical power, due to the non-uniform distribution of lesions across a large field of view. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12938-023-01173-0. |
---|