Cargando…
Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with presbyopia‐correcting and toric intraocular lenses – a narrative review
Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is the leading indication for EK and may coexist with cataract and presbyopia. Notably, the outcomes of phacoemulsification in FECD patients are not as favorable as those in eyes without this condition. Historically, only monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs)...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10675930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38007433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03240-5 |
_version_ | 1785149878780821504 |
---|---|
author | Rodríguez-Calvo-de-Mora, Marina Rocha-de-Lossada, Carlos Romano, Vito Rodríguez-Vallejo, Manuel Fernández, Joaquín |
author_facet | Rodríguez-Calvo-de-Mora, Marina Rocha-de-Lossada, Carlos Romano, Vito Rodríguez-Vallejo, Manuel Fernández, Joaquín |
author_sort | Rodríguez-Calvo-de-Mora, Marina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is the leading indication for EK and may coexist with cataract and presbyopia. Notably, the outcomes of phacoemulsification in FECD patients are not as favorable as those in eyes without this condition. Historically, only monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) were recommended for these patients. However, recent reports have described the implantation of Premium-IOLs (such as Multifocal IOLs, Enhanced Depth of Focus IOLs, and Toric IOLs) in FECD eyes undergoing cataract surgery and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). While the results are encouraging, they are not as optimal as those from unoperated eyes, especially when comparing simultaneous procedures to sequential ones. It’s advised to perform the DMEK first to improve the accuracy of IOL calculations. Still, even successfully operated eyes may experience secondary graft failure or graft rejection after DMEK. The success rate of a secondary DMEK is typically lower than that of the initial procedure. Furthermore, if the postoperative thickness after DMEK is less than anticipated, laser enhancements might not be an option. There’s a pressing need for more controlled and randomized clinical trials to ascertain the safety and effectiveness of Premium-IOLs for FECD eyes. This narrative review aims to collate evidence on the use of Premium IOL technologies in eyes receiving EK and to underscore key points for surgeons performing EK combined with cataract surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10675930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106759302023-11-25 Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with presbyopia‐correcting and toric intraocular lenses – a narrative review Rodríguez-Calvo-de-Mora, Marina Rocha-de-Lossada, Carlos Romano, Vito Rodríguez-Vallejo, Manuel Fernández, Joaquín BMC Ophthalmol Review Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is the leading indication for EK and may coexist with cataract and presbyopia. Notably, the outcomes of phacoemulsification in FECD patients are not as favorable as those in eyes without this condition. Historically, only monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) were recommended for these patients. However, recent reports have described the implantation of Premium-IOLs (such as Multifocal IOLs, Enhanced Depth of Focus IOLs, and Toric IOLs) in FECD eyes undergoing cataract surgery and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). While the results are encouraging, they are not as optimal as those from unoperated eyes, especially when comparing simultaneous procedures to sequential ones. It’s advised to perform the DMEK first to improve the accuracy of IOL calculations. Still, even successfully operated eyes may experience secondary graft failure or graft rejection after DMEK. The success rate of a secondary DMEK is typically lower than that of the initial procedure. Furthermore, if the postoperative thickness after DMEK is less than anticipated, laser enhancements might not be an option. There’s a pressing need for more controlled and randomized clinical trials to ascertain the safety and effectiveness of Premium-IOLs for FECD eyes. This narrative review aims to collate evidence on the use of Premium IOL technologies in eyes receiving EK and to underscore key points for surgeons performing EK combined with cataract surgery. BioMed Central 2023-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10675930/ /pubmed/38007433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03240-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Rodríguez-Calvo-de-Mora, Marina Rocha-de-Lossada, Carlos Romano, Vito Rodríguez-Vallejo, Manuel Fernández, Joaquín Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with presbyopia‐correcting and toric intraocular lenses – a narrative review |
title | Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with presbyopia‐correcting and toric intraocular lenses – a narrative review |
title_full | Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with presbyopia‐correcting and toric intraocular lenses – a narrative review |
title_fullStr | Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with presbyopia‐correcting and toric intraocular lenses – a narrative review |
title_full_unstemmed | Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with presbyopia‐correcting and toric intraocular lenses – a narrative review |
title_short | Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with presbyopia‐correcting and toric intraocular lenses – a narrative review |
title_sort | descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with presbyopia‐correcting and toric intraocular lenses – a narrative review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10675930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38007433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03240-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rodriguezcalvodemoramarina descemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastycombinedwithpresbyopiacorrectingandtoricintraocularlensesanarrativereview AT rochadelossadacarlos descemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastycombinedwithpresbyopiacorrectingandtoricintraocularlensesanarrativereview AT romanovito descemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastycombinedwithpresbyopiacorrectingandtoricintraocularlensesanarrativereview AT rodriguezvallejomanuel descemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastycombinedwithpresbyopiacorrectingandtoricintraocularlensesanarrativereview AT fernandezjoaquin descemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastycombinedwithpresbyopiacorrectingandtoricintraocularlensesanarrativereview |