Clinical characteristics and outcome in expansive compared with steno-occlusive mural hematoma in spontaneous cervical artery dissection

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous cervical artery dissection (sCeAD) is one of the prime causes of ischemic stroke in young adults. Based on vessel wall imaging, steno-occlusive or expansive wall hematomas can be distinguished. It is unclear whether these two distinct morphological phenotypes reflect different pathophysiological processes. AIM: We aim to evaluate differences in clinical characteristics and long-term recurrence between patients with expansive and steno-occlusive mural wall hematoma in the acute phase. METHODS: Participants of the ReSect-study, one of the largest single-center cohort studies with long-term follow-up of sCeAD patients, with sufficient magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included. All available MRI scans were retrospectively evaluated for patients dichotomized to two groups: (1) mural hematoma causing steno-occlusive pathologies without expansion of total vessel diameter (steno-occlusive hematoma), and (2) mural hematoma causing vessel diameter expansion without lumen stenosis (expansive hematoma). Patients with mixed steno-occlusive and expansive vessel pathologies were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS: In total, 221 individuals were available for analysis. The pathognomonic vessel wall hematoma was steno-occlusive in 187 (84.6%) and expansive in 34 (15.4%). No difference was seen in patient demographics, clinical status at admission, laboratory parameters, family history, or the frequency of clinical stigmata for connective tissue disorders. Both patients with expansive and steno-occlusive mural hematoma had a high likelihood of suffering cerebral ischemia (64.7 vs 79.7). Still, time from symptom onset to diagnosis was significantly longer in those with expansive dissection (17.8 vs 7.8 days, p = 0.02). Those with expansive dissections were more likely to have upper respiratory infection within 4 weeks prior to dissection (26.5% vs 12.3%, p = 0.03). Upon follow-up, functional outcome was identical and groups did not differ in rate of sCeAD recurrence, but those with expansive mural hematoma at baseline more frequently had residual aneurysmal formation (41.2% vs 11.5%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: As cerebral ischemia was frequent in both, our clinical results do not advise for differential treatment or follow-up based on the acute morphological phenotype. There was no clear evidence of a different aetiopathogenesis between patients with steno-occlusive or expansive mural hematoma in the acute phase. More mechanistic approaches are needed to elucidate potential differences in pathomechanism between both entities. DATA ACCESS: Anonymized data not published within this article will be made available by request from any qualified investigator.