Cargando…

How Much Lumbar Lordosis does a Patient Need to Reach their Age-Adjusted Alignment Target? A Formulated Approach Predicting Successful Surgical Outcomes

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Identify optimal lumbar lordosis in adult deformity correction to achieve age-adjusted targets and sustained alignment. METHODS: Surgical adult spinal deformity patients reaching an age-adjusted ideal alignment at one year were identified. Multil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCarthy, Michael H., Lafage, Renaud, Smith, Justin S., Bess, Shay, Ames, Christopher P., Klineberg, Eric O., Kim, Han J., Shaffrey, Christopher I., Burton, Douglas C., Mundis, Gregory M., Gupta, Manish C., Schwab, Frank J., Lafage, Virginie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10676150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35442842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682221092003
Descripción
Sumario:STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Identify optimal lumbar lordosis in adult deformity correction to achieve age-adjusted targets and sustained alignment. METHODS: Surgical adult spinal deformity patients reaching an age-adjusted ideal alignment at one year were identified. Multilinear regression analysis was used to identify the relationship between regional curvatures (LL and TK) that enabled achievement of a given global alignment (T1 pelvic angle, TPA) based on pelvic incidence (PI). RESULTS: 347 patients out of 1048 available reached their age-adjusted TPA within 5° (60-year-old, 72% women, body mass index 29 ± 6.2). They had a significant improvement in all sagittal parameters (except PI) from pre-operative baseline to 1 year following surgery (P < .001). Multilinear regression predicting L1-S1 based on TK, TPA, and PI demonstrated excellent results (R2 = .85). Simplification of the coefficients of prediction combined with a conversion to an age-based formula led to the following: LL = PI - 0.3TK - 0.5Age + 10. Internal validation of the formula led to a mean error of −.4°, and an absolute error of 5.0°. Internal validation on patients with an age-adjusted alignment revealed similar accuracy across the entire age-adjusted TPA spectrum (ranges of LL errors: ME = .2° to 1.7°, AE = 4.0° to 5.3°). CONCLUSION: This study provides a simple guideline to identify the amount of LL needed to reach a given alignment (i.e., age-adjusted target) based on PI and associated TK. Implementation of this predictive formula during pre-operative surgical planning may help to reduce unexpected sub-optimal post-operative alignment outcomes.