Cargando…
Mechanical Needling With Sterile Water Versus Lidocaine Injection for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Study Design: This was a retrospective observational study that assessed the clinical outcome of ageing patients who received ultrasound-guided (USG) mechanical needling with sterile water injection. In addition, the clinical outcome of age-and gender matched patients randomly selected from patients...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10676179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35510334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682221094533 |
_version_ | 1785141229120389120 |
---|---|
author | Suputtitada, Areerat Chen, Carl P. C. Pongpirul, Krit |
author_facet | Suputtitada, Areerat Chen, Carl P. C. Pongpirul, Krit |
author_sort | Suputtitada, Areerat |
collection | PubMed |
description | Study Design: This was a retrospective observational study that assessed the clinical outcome of ageing patients who received ultrasound-guided (USG) mechanical needling with sterile water injection. In addition, the clinical outcome of age-and gender matched patients randomly selected from patients who received needling with sterile water was compared to the patients injected with lidocaine in a 1:1 ratio. Objective: This present study aimed to explore the clinical effects of USG mechanical needling with sterile water injection for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Methods: The data was extracted from the medical records of ageing patients with LSS who received USG injection at the lumbosacral spine by the first author. Low back pain or axial pain, and leg pain or radicular pain were assessed by the visual analogue scale, and gait ability with walking distance were obtained at six different time points. Results: A total of 4328 medical records were examined. Four thousand two hundred and twenty-eight ageing patients received mechanical needling with sterile water injection and found the efficacy lasted up to 6 months. One hundred patients were compared with 100 patients who received lidocaine injection. Those who received lidocaine had pain returned at 3 months and 6 months post-injection. Conclusions: USG mechanical needling with sterile water injection could help relieve axial and radicular pain for at least 6 months. Removal of calcification and fibrosis as well as reduction of sensitization are all possible mechanisms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10676179 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106761792022-05-04 Mechanical Needling With Sterile Water Versus Lidocaine Injection for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Suputtitada, Areerat Chen, Carl P. C. Pongpirul, Krit Global Spine J Original Articles Study Design: This was a retrospective observational study that assessed the clinical outcome of ageing patients who received ultrasound-guided (USG) mechanical needling with sterile water injection. In addition, the clinical outcome of age-and gender matched patients randomly selected from patients who received needling with sterile water was compared to the patients injected with lidocaine in a 1:1 ratio. Objective: This present study aimed to explore the clinical effects of USG mechanical needling with sterile water injection for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Methods: The data was extracted from the medical records of ageing patients with LSS who received USG injection at the lumbosacral spine by the first author. Low back pain or axial pain, and leg pain or radicular pain were assessed by the visual analogue scale, and gait ability with walking distance were obtained at six different time points. Results: A total of 4328 medical records were examined. Four thousand two hundred and twenty-eight ageing patients received mechanical needling with sterile water injection and found the efficacy lasted up to 6 months. One hundred patients were compared with 100 patients who received lidocaine injection. Those who received lidocaine had pain returned at 3 months and 6 months post-injection. Conclusions: USG mechanical needling with sterile water injection could help relieve axial and radicular pain for at least 6 months. Removal of calcification and fibrosis as well as reduction of sensitization are all possible mechanisms. SAGE Publications 2022-05-04 2024-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10676179/ /pubmed/35510334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682221094533 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Suputtitada, Areerat Chen, Carl P. C. Pongpirul, Krit Mechanical Needling With Sterile Water Versus Lidocaine Injection for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis |
title | Mechanical Needling With Sterile Water Versus Lidocaine Injection for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis |
title_full | Mechanical Needling With Sterile Water Versus Lidocaine Injection for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis |
title_fullStr | Mechanical Needling With Sterile Water Versus Lidocaine Injection for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanical Needling With Sterile Water Versus Lidocaine Injection for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis |
title_short | Mechanical Needling With Sterile Water Versus Lidocaine Injection for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis |
title_sort | mechanical needling with sterile water versus lidocaine injection for lumbar spinal stenosis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10676179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35510334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682221094533 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suputtitadaareerat mechanicalneedlingwithsterilewaterversuslidocaineinjectionforlumbarspinalstenosis AT chencarlpc mechanicalneedlingwithsterilewaterversuslidocaineinjectionforlumbarspinalstenosis AT pongpirulkrit mechanicalneedlingwithsterilewaterversuslidocaineinjectionforlumbarspinalstenosis |