Cargando…
Does Conventional Open TLIF cause more Muscle Injury when Compared to Minimally Invasive TLIF?—A Prospective Single Center Analysis
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, observational. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to assess the amount of reduction in lean muscle mass (LMM) of multifidus muscle (MFM) between conventional open Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (CO-TLIF) as compared to Minimally invasive spine Transforaminal lumb...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10676181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35442112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682221095467 |
_version_ | 1785141229599588352 |
---|---|
author | Dave, Bharat R. Marathe, Nandan Mayi, Shivanand Degulmadi, Devanand Rai, Ravi Ranjan Patil, Sameer Jadav, Kirit Bali, Shiv K. Kumar, Arvind Meena, Umesh Parmar, Vatsal Amin, Prarthan Dave, Mirant Krishnan, Preety Ajay Krishnan, Ajay |
author_facet | Dave, Bharat R. Marathe, Nandan Mayi, Shivanand Degulmadi, Devanand Rai, Ravi Ranjan Patil, Sameer Jadav, Kirit Bali, Shiv K. Kumar, Arvind Meena, Umesh Parmar, Vatsal Amin, Prarthan Dave, Mirant Krishnan, Preety Ajay Krishnan, Ajay |
author_sort | Dave, Bharat R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, observational. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to assess the amount of reduction in lean muscle mass (LMM) of multifidus muscle (MFM) between conventional open Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (CO-TLIF) as compared to Minimally invasive spine Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). METHODS: This study was conducted between 2017 and 2020. It included 100 patients divided into two groups, 50 patients treated with CO-TLIF, 50 treated with MIS-TLIF. Only patients undergoing single level, primary lumbar fusion at L4-5 or L5-S1 level for degenerative pathologies were included. All patients were assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans 1-year post surgery. Measurements were performed using ImageJ image processing program. RESULTS: Mean percentage reduction in LMM in CO-TLIF group was 45.52 ± 12.36% and MIS-TLIF group was 25.83 ± 9.64% [statistically significant (t = 8.78, P < .001)]. Mean percentage reduction in LMM on side of cage insertion was 39.63 ± 15.96% and opposite side was 31.40 ± 15.01% [statistically significant (t = 9.06, P < .001)]. Mean reduction of LMM among males was 29.38 ± 15.23% and females was 40.42 ± 12.67% [statistically significant (t = −3.95, P < .001)]. We observed significant but weak degree of correlation between age and percentage reduction of LMM (r = .22, P = .028). CONCLUSION: Mean reduction in LMM was greater in CO-TLIF group as compared to MIS-TLIF. There was greater reduction in LMM in females and on side of cage insertion. We also found greater reduction in LMM with increasing age in both groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10676181 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106761812022-04-20 Does Conventional Open TLIF cause more Muscle Injury when Compared to Minimally Invasive TLIF?—A Prospective Single Center Analysis Dave, Bharat R. Marathe, Nandan Mayi, Shivanand Degulmadi, Devanand Rai, Ravi Ranjan Patil, Sameer Jadav, Kirit Bali, Shiv K. Kumar, Arvind Meena, Umesh Parmar, Vatsal Amin, Prarthan Dave, Mirant Krishnan, Preety Ajay Krishnan, Ajay Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, observational. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to assess the amount of reduction in lean muscle mass (LMM) of multifidus muscle (MFM) between conventional open Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (CO-TLIF) as compared to Minimally invasive spine Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). METHODS: This study was conducted between 2017 and 2020. It included 100 patients divided into two groups, 50 patients treated with CO-TLIF, 50 treated with MIS-TLIF. Only patients undergoing single level, primary lumbar fusion at L4-5 or L5-S1 level for degenerative pathologies were included. All patients were assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans 1-year post surgery. Measurements were performed using ImageJ image processing program. RESULTS: Mean percentage reduction in LMM in CO-TLIF group was 45.52 ± 12.36% and MIS-TLIF group was 25.83 ± 9.64% [statistically significant (t = 8.78, P < .001)]. Mean percentage reduction in LMM on side of cage insertion was 39.63 ± 15.96% and opposite side was 31.40 ± 15.01% [statistically significant (t = 9.06, P < .001)]. Mean reduction of LMM among males was 29.38 ± 15.23% and females was 40.42 ± 12.67% [statistically significant (t = −3.95, P < .001)]. We observed significant but weak degree of correlation between age and percentage reduction of LMM (r = .22, P = .028). CONCLUSION: Mean reduction in LMM was greater in CO-TLIF group as compared to MIS-TLIF. There was greater reduction in LMM in females and on side of cage insertion. We also found greater reduction in LMM with increasing age in both groups. SAGE Publications 2022-04-20 2024-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10676181/ /pubmed/35442112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682221095467 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Dave, Bharat R. Marathe, Nandan Mayi, Shivanand Degulmadi, Devanand Rai, Ravi Ranjan Patil, Sameer Jadav, Kirit Bali, Shiv K. Kumar, Arvind Meena, Umesh Parmar, Vatsal Amin, Prarthan Dave, Mirant Krishnan, Preety Ajay Krishnan, Ajay Does Conventional Open TLIF cause more Muscle Injury when Compared to Minimally Invasive TLIF?—A Prospective Single Center Analysis |
title | Does Conventional Open TLIF cause more Muscle Injury when Compared to Minimally Invasive TLIF?—A Prospective Single Center Analysis |
title_full | Does Conventional Open TLIF cause more Muscle Injury when Compared to Minimally Invasive TLIF?—A Prospective Single Center Analysis |
title_fullStr | Does Conventional Open TLIF cause more Muscle Injury when Compared to Minimally Invasive TLIF?—A Prospective Single Center Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Conventional Open TLIF cause more Muscle Injury when Compared to Minimally Invasive TLIF?—A Prospective Single Center Analysis |
title_short | Does Conventional Open TLIF cause more Muscle Injury when Compared to Minimally Invasive TLIF?—A Prospective Single Center Analysis |
title_sort | does conventional open tlif cause more muscle injury when compared to minimally invasive tlif?—a prospective single center analysis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10676181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35442112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682221095467 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davebharatr doesconventionalopentlifcausemoremuscleinjurywhencomparedtominimallyinvasivetlifaprospectivesinglecenteranalysis AT marathenandan doesconventionalopentlifcausemoremuscleinjurywhencomparedtominimallyinvasivetlifaprospectivesinglecenteranalysis AT mayishivanand doesconventionalopentlifcausemoremuscleinjurywhencomparedtominimallyinvasivetlifaprospectivesinglecenteranalysis AT degulmadidevanand doesconventionalopentlifcausemoremuscleinjurywhencomparedtominimallyinvasivetlifaprospectivesinglecenteranalysis AT rairaviranjan doesconventionalopentlifcausemoremuscleinjurywhencomparedtominimallyinvasivetlifaprospectivesinglecenteranalysis AT patilsameer doesconventionalopentlifcausemoremuscleinjurywhencomparedtominimallyinvasivetlifaprospectivesinglecenteranalysis AT jadavkirit doesconventionalopentlifcausemoremuscleinjurywhencomparedtominimallyinvasivetlifaprospectivesinglecenteranalysis AT balishivk doesconventionalopentlifcausemoremuscleinjurywhencomparedtominimallyinvasivetlifaprospectivesinglecenteranalysis AT kumararvind doesconventionalopentlifcausemoremuscleinjurywhencomparedtominimallyinvasivetlifaprospectivesinglecenteranalysis AT meenaumesh doesconventionalopentlifcausemoremuscleinjurywhencomparedtominimallyinvasivetlifaprospectivesinglecenteranalysis AT parmarvatsal doesconventionalopentlifcausemoremuscleinjurywhencomparedtominimallyinvasivetlifaprospectivesinglecenteranalysis AT aminprarthan doesconventionalopentlifcausemoremuscleinjurywhencomparedtominimallyinvasivetlifaprospectivesinglecenteranalysis AT davemirant doesconventionalopentlifcausemoremuscleinjurywhencomparedtominimallyinvasivetlifaprospectivesinglecenteranalysis AT krishnanpreetyajay doesconventionalopentlifcausemoremuscleinjurywhencomparedtominimallyinvasivetlifaprospectivesinglecenteranalysis AT krishnanajay doesconventionalopentlifcausemoremuscleinjurywhencomparedtominimallyinvasivetlifaprospectivesinglecenteranalysis |