Cargando…

Ultra-low tidal volume ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation shows no mitigating effect on pulmonary end-organ damage compared to standard ventilation: insights from a porcine model

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether ultra-low tidal volume ventilation (ULTVV) applied during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) compared with standard ventilation (intermittent positive pressure ventilation, IPPV) can reduce pulmonary end-organ damage in the post-resuscitation period....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohnke, Katja, Conzelmann, Philipp, Renz, Miriam, Riedel, Julian, Rissel, René, Urmann, Andrea, Hain, Johanna, Duenges, Bastian, Ziebart, Alexander, Ruemmler, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10676323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38006467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-023-00568-6
_version_ 1785149919399510016
author Mohnke, Katja
Conzelmann, Philipp
Renz, Miriam
Riedel, Julian
Rissel, René
Urmann, Andrea
Hain, Johanna
Duenges, Bastian
Ziebart, Alexander
Ruemmler, Robert
author_facet Mohnke, Katja
Conzelmann, Philipp
Renz, Miriam
Riedel, Julian
Rissel, René
Urmann, Andrea
Hain, Johanna
Duenges, Bastian
Ziebart, Alexander
Ruemmler, Robert
author_sort Mohnke, Katja
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether ultra-low tidal volume ventilation (ULTVV) applied during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) compared with standard ventilation (intermittent positive pressure ventilation, IPPV) can reduce pulmonary end-organ damage in the post-resuscitation period. METHODS: A prospective, randomized trial was conducted using a porcine model (n = 45). The animals were divided into three groups: IPPV, ULTVV, and a sham control group. Juvenile male pigs underwent CPR after inducing ventricular fibrillation and received the designated ventilation intervention [IPPV: tidal volume 6–8 ml per kilogram body weight (ml/kg BW), respiratory rate 10/min, FiO(2) 1.0; ULTVV: tidal volume 2–3 ml/kg BW, respiratory rate 50/min, FiO(2) 1.0]. A 20-h observation period followed if return of spontaneous circulation was achieved. Histopathological examination using the diffuse alveolar damage scoring system was performed on postmortem lung tissue samples. Arterial and venous blood gas analyses and ventilation/perfusion measurements via multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET) were repeatedly recorded during the experiment. RESULTS: Out of the 45 experiments conducted, 28 animals were excluded based on predefined criteria. Histopathological analysis showed no significant differences in lung damage between the ULTVV and IPPV groups. ULTVV demonstrated adequate oxygenation and decarboxylation. MIGET measurements during and after resuscitation revealed no significant differences between the intervention groups. CONCLUSION: In the short-term follow-up phase, ULTVV demonstrated similar histopathological changes and functional pulmonary parameters compared to standard ventilation. Further research is needed to investigate the long-term effects and clinical implications of ULTVV in resuscitation settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40635-023-00568-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10676323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106763232023-11-25 Ultra-low tidal volume ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation shows no mitigating effect on pulmonary end-organ damage compared to standard ventilation: insights from a porcine model Mohnke, Katja Conzelmann, Philipp Renz, Miriam Riedel, Julian Rissel, René Urmann, Andrea Hain, Johanna Duenges, Bastian Ziebart, Alexander Ruemmler, Robert Intensive Care Med Exp Research Articles OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether ultra-low tidal volume ventilation (ULTVV) applied during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) compared with standard ventilation (intermittent positive pressure ventilation, IPPV) can reduce pulmonary end-organ damage in the post-resuscitation period. METHODS: A prospective, randomized trial was conducted using a porcine model (n = 45). The animals were divided into three groups: IPPV, ULTVV, and a sham control group. Juvenile male pigs underwent CPR after inducing ventricular fibrillation and received the designated ventilation intervention [IPPV: tidal volume 6–8 ml per kilogram body weight (ml/kg BW), respiratory rate 10/min, FiO(2) 1.0; ULTVV: tidal volume 2–3 ml/kg BW, respiratory rate 50/min, FiO(2) 1.0]. A 20-h observation period followed if return of spontaneous circulation was achieved. Histopathological examination using the diffuse alveolar damage scoring system was performed on postmortem lung tissue samples. Arterial and venous blood gas analyses and ventilation/perfusion measurements via multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET) were repeatedly recorded during the experiment. RESULTS: Out of the 45 experiments conducted, 28 animals were excluded based on predefined criteria. Histopathological analysis showed no significant differences in lung damage between the ULTVV and IPPV groups. ULTVV demonstrated adequate oxygenation and decarboxylation. MIGET measurements during and after resuscitation revealed no significant differences between the intervention groups. CONCLUSION: In the short-term follow-up phase, ULTVV demonstrated similar histopathological changes and functional pulmonary parameters compared to standard ventilation. Further research is needed to investigate the long-term effects and clinical implications of ULTVV in resuscitation settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40635-023-00568-6. Springer International Publishing 2023-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10676323/ /pubmed/38006467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-023-00568-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Articles
Mohnke, Katja
Conzelmann, Philipp
Renz, Miriam
Riedel, Julian
Rissel, René
Urmann, Andrea
Hain, Johanna
Duenges, Bastian
Ziebart, Alexander
Ruemmler, Robert
Ultra-low tidal volume ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation shows no mitigating effect on pulmonary end-organ damage compared to standard ventilation: insights from a porcine model
title Ultra-low tidal volume ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation shows no mitigating effect on pulmonary end-organ damage compared to standard ventilation: insights from a porcine model
title_full Ultra-low tidal volume ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation shows no mitigating effect on pulmonary end-organ damage compared to standard ventilation: insights from a porcine model
title_fullStr Ultra-low tidal volume ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation shows no mitigating effect on pulmonary end-organ damage compared to standard ventilation: insights from a porcine model
title_full_unstemmed Ultra-low tidal volume ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation shows no mitigating effect on pulmonary end-organ damage compared to standard ventilation: insights from a porcine model
title_short Ultra-low tidal volume ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation shows no mitigating effect on pulmonary end-organ damage compared to standard ventilation: insights from a porcine model
title_sort ultra-low tidal volume ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation shows no mitigating effect on pulmonary end-organ damage compared to standard ventilation: insights from a porcine model
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10676323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38006467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-023-00568-6
work_keys_str_mv AT mohnkekatja ultralowtidalvolumeventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationshowsnomitigatingeffectonpulmonaryendorgandamagecomparedtostandardventilationinsightsfromaporcinemodel
AT conzelmannphilipp ultralowtidalvolumeventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationshowsnomitigatingeffectonpulmonaryendorgandamagecomparedtostandardventilationinsightsfromaporcinemodel
AT renzmiriam ultralowtidalvolumeventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationshowsnomitigatingeffectonpulmonaryendorgandamagecomparedtostandardventilationinsightsfromaporcinemodel
AT riedeljulian ultralowtidalvolumeventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationshowsnomitigatingeffectonpulmonaryendorgandamagecomparedtostandardventilationinsightsfromaporcinemodel
AT risselrene ultralowtidalvolumeventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationshowsnomitigatingeffectonpulmonaryendorgandamagecomparedtostandardventilationinsightsfromaporcinemodel
AT urmannandrea ultralowtidalvolumeventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationshowsnomitigatingeffectonpulmonaryendorgandamagecomparedtostandardventilationinsightsfromaporcinemodel
AT hainjohanna ultralowtidalvolumeventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationshowsnomitigatingeffectonpulmonaryendorgandamagecomparedtostandardventilationinsightsfromaporcinemodel
AT duengesbastian ultralowtidalvolumeventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationshowsnomitigatingeffectonpulmonaryendorgandamagecomparedtostandardventilationinsightsfromaporcinemodel
AT ziebartalexander ultralowtidalvolumeventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationshowsnomitigatingeffectonpulmonaryendorgandamagecomparedtostandardventilationinsightsfromaporcinemodel
AT ruemmlerrobert ultralowtidalvolumeventilationduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitationshowsnomitigatingeffectonpulmonaryendorgandamagecomparedtostandardventilationinsightsfromaporcinemodel