Cargando…

Comparison of two novel methods for counting wheat ears in the field with terrestrial LiDAR

BACKGROUND: The metrics for assessing the yield of crops in the field include the number of ears per unit area, the grain number per ear, and the thousand-grain weight. Typically, the ear number per unit area contributes the most to the yield. However, calculation of the ear number tends to rely on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gu, Yangyang, Ai, Hongxu, Guo, Tai, Liu, Peng, Wang, Yongqing, Zheng, Hengbiao, Cheng, Tao, Zhu, Yan, Cao, Weixing, Yao, Xia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10676603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38007501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-023-01093-z
_version_ 1785149952966524928
author Gu, Yangyang
Ai, Hongxu
Guo, Tai
Liu, Peng
Wang, Yongqing
Zheng, Hengbiao
Cheng, Tao
Zhu, Yan
Cao, Weixing
Yao, Xia
author_facet Gu, Yangyang
Ai, Hongxu
Guo, Tai
Liu, Peng
Wang, Yongqing
Zheng, Hengbiao
Cheng, Tao
Zhu, Yan
Cao, Weixing
Yao, Xia
author_sort Gu, Yangyang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The metrics for assessing the yield of crops in the field include the number of ears per unit area, the grain number per ear, and the thousand-grain weight. Typically, the ear number per unit area contributes the most to the yield. However, calculation of the ear number tends to rely on traditional manual counting, which is inefficient, labour intensive, inaccurate, and lacking in objectivity. In this study, two novel extraction algorithms for the estimation of the wheat ear number were developed based on the use of terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) in conjunction with the density-based spatial clustering (DBSC) algorithm based on the normal and the voxel-based regional growth (VBRG) algorithm. The DBSC involves two steps: (1) segmentation of the point clouds using differences in the normal vectors and (2) clustering of the segmented point clouds using a density clustering algorithm to calculate the ear number. The VBRG involves three steps: (1) voxelization of the point clouds, (2) construction of the topological relationships between the voxels as a connected region using the k-dimensional tree, and (3) detection of the wheat ears in the connected areas using a regional growth algorithm. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that DBSC and VBRG were promising in estimating the number of ears for different cultivars, planting densities, N fertilization rates, and growth stages of wheat (RMSE = 76 ~ 114 ears/m(2), rRMSE = 18.62 ~ 27.96%, r = 0.76 ~ 0.84). Comparing the performance of the two algorithms, the overall accuracy of the DBSC (RMSE = 76 ears/m(2), rRMSE = 18.62%, r = 0.84) was better than that of the VBRG (RMSE = 114 ears/m(2), rRMSE = 27.96%, r = 0.76). It was found that with the DBSC, the calculation in points as units permitted more detailed information to be retained, and this method was more suitable for estimation of the wheat ear number in the field. CONCLUSIONS: The algorithms adopted in this study provide new approaches for non-destructive measurement and efficient acquisition of the ear number in the assessment of the wheat yield phenotype.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10676603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106766032023-11-26 Comparison of two novel methods for counting wheat ears in the field with terrestrial LiDAR Gu, Yangyang Ai, Hongxu Guo, Tai Liu, Peng Wang, Yongqing Zheng, Hengbiao Cheng, Tao Zhu, Yan Cao, Weixing Yao, Xia Plant Methods Research BACKGROUND: The metrics for assessing the yield of crops in the field include the number of ears per unit area, the grain number per ear, and the thousand-grain weight. Typically, the ear number per unit area contributes the most to the yield. However, calculation of the ear number tends to rely on traditional manual counting, which is inefficient, labour intensive, inaccurate, and lacking in objectivity. In this study, two novel extraction algorithms for the estimation of the wheat ear number were developed based on the use of terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) in conjunction with the density-based spatial clustering (DBSC) algorithm based on the normal and the voxel-based regional growth (VBRG) algorithm. The DBSC involves two steps: (1) segmentation of the point clouds using differences in the normal vectors and (2) clustering of the segmented point clouds using a density clustering algorithm to calculate the ear number. The VBRG involves three steps: (1) voxelization of the point clouds, (2) construction of the topological relationships between the voxels as a connected region using the k-dimensional tree, and (3) detection of the wheat ears in the connected areas using a regional growth algorithm. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that DBSC and VBRG were promising in estimating the number of ears for different cultivars, planting densities, N fertilization rates, and growth stages of wheat (RMSE = 76 ~ 114 ears/m(2), rRMSE = 18.62 ~ 27.96%, r = 0.76 ~ 0.84). Comparing the performance of the two algorithms, the overall accuracy of the DBSC (RMSE = 76 ears/m(2), rRMSE = 18.62%, r = 0.84) was better than that of the VBRG (RMSE = 114 ears/m(2), rRMSE = 27.96%, r = 0.76). It was found that with the DBSC, the calculation in points as units permitted more detailed information to be retained, and this method was more suitable for estimation of the wheat ear number in the field. CONCLUSIONS: The algorithms adopted in this study provide new approaches for non-destructive measurement and efficient acquisition of the ear number in the assessment of the wheat yield phenotype. BioMed Central 2023-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10676603/ /pubmed/38007501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-023-01093-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gu, Yangyang
Ai, Hongxu
Guo, Tai
Liu, Peng
Wang, Yongqing
Zheng, Hengbiao
Cheng, Tao
Zhu, Yan
Cao, Weixing
Yao, Xia
Comparison of two novel methods for counting wheat ears in the field with terrestrial LiDAR
title Comparison of two novel methods for counting wheat ears in the field with terrestrial LiDAR
title_full Comparison of two novel methods for counting wheat ears in the field with terrestrial LiDAR
title_fullStr Comparison of two novel methods for counting wheat ears in the field with terrestrial LiDAR
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two novel methods for counting wheat ears in the field with terrestrial LiDAR
title_short Comparison of two novel methods for counting wheat ears in the field with terrestrial LiDAR
title_sort comparison of two novel methods for counting wheat ears in the field with terrestrial lidar
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10676603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38007501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-023-01093-z
work_keys_str_mv AT guyangyang comparisonoftwonovelmethodsforcountingwheatearsinthefieldwithterrestriallidar
AT aihongxu comparisonoftwonovelmethodsforcountingwheatearsinthefieldwithterrestriallidar
AT guotai comparisonoftwonovelmethodsforcountingwheatearsinthefieldwithterrestriallidar
AT liupeng comparisonoftwonovelmethodsforcountingwheatearsinthefieldwithterrestriallidar
AT wangyongqing comparisonoftwonovelmethodsforcountingwheatearsinthefieldwithterrestriallidar
AT zhenghengbiao comparisonoftwonovelmethodsforcountingwheatearsinthefieldwithterrestriallidar
AT chengtao comparisonoftwonovelmethodsforcountingwheatearsinthefieldwithterrestriallidar
AT zhuyan comparisonoftwonovelmethodsforcountingwheatearsinthefieldwithterrestriallidar
AT caoweixing comparisonoftwonovelmethodsforcountingwheatearsinthefieldwithterrestriallidar
AT yaoxia comparisonoftwonovelmethodsforcountingwheatearsinthefieldwithterrestriallidar