Cargando…

1227. Analysis of Prescriber Interaction with an Electronic Antibiotic Time-out Best Practice Alert

BACKGROUND: The impact of antibiotic time-outs (ATOs) on antibiotic use relies heavily on prescriber interaction, which may be reduced due to workflow disruption or alert fatigue. In August 2022, Hartford HealthCare implemented a 72-hour ATO best practice alert. Herein, we evaluated prescriber behav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ackley, Tyler, Bilinskaya, Anastasia, Kuti, Joseph L, Linder, Kristin E, Dempsey, Casey J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10676958/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1067
_version_ 1785150017185513472
author Ackley, Tyler
Bilinskaya, Anastasia
Kuti, Joseph L
Linder, Kristin E
Dempsey, Casey J
author_facet Ackley, Tyler
Bilinskaya, Anastasia
Kuti, Joseph L
Linder, Kristin E
Dempsey, Casey J
author_sort Ackley, Tyler
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The impact of antibiotic time-outs (ATOs) on antibiotic use relies heavily on prescriber interaction, which may be reduced due to workflow disruption or alert fatigue. In August 2022, Hartford HealthCare implemented a 72-hour ATO best practice alert. Herein, we evaluated prescriber behavior when interacting with the ATO alert to assess the impact on prescriber stewardship workflow. METHODS: An ATO alert was designed to fire between 0700 and 1630. Upon firing, prescribers were prompted to assess for antibiotic modification – a composite including discontinuation, de-escalation, inclusion of stop-date, and transition to oral therapies. Additional responses were included to defer re-firing for patients deemed not to be a candidate for antibiotic modification. The primary endpoint was defined as the rate of ATO response aligning with antibiotic modification for the 10 most frequently utilized antibiotics and assessed from 10/1/22 – 12/31/22. A predefined subset of patients was evaluated for ATO appropriateness by prescriber specialty and role. RESULTS: A total of 15,383 ATO alerts were included for analysis, corresponding to 3,498 unique patients. The primary endpoint occurred in 21.4% of cases. The most commonly selected ATO response was a reminder in 10 minutes (48.2%). The median time viewing the ATO alert was 5 seconds (IQR 4 – 8s). In a subset of 400 patients, ATO selections were found to be appropriate in 56% of cases. When stratified by prescriber role, attending physicians were more likely to appropriately utilize the ATO compared to resident and advanced practice practitioners (62.7% vs 48.5% vs 46.2%, p = 0.007) and were more likely to select an ATO response aligning with antibiotic modification (39.5% vs 7.6% vs 12.3%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ATO selection corresponding to antibiotic modification was low regardless of prescriber role. Further work optimizing the ATO design will be required to improve integration into stewardship workflow. DISCLOSURES: Joseph L. Kuti, PharmD, bioMeriuex Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Merck & Co, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi Inc: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi Inc: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi Inc: Honoraria
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10676958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106769582023-11-27 1227. Analysis of Prescriber Interaction with an Electronic Antibiotic Time-out Best Practice Alert Ackley, Tyler Bilinskaya, Anastasia Kuti, Joseph L Linder, Kristin E Dempsey, Casey J Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: The impact of antibiotic time-outs (ATOs) on antibiotic use relies heavily on prescriber interaction, which may be reduced due to workflow disruption or alert fatigue. In August 2022, Hartford HealthCare implemented a 72-hour ATO best practice alert. Herein, we evaluated prescriber behavior when interacting with the ATO alert to assess the impact on prescriber stewardship workflow. METHODS: An ATO alert was designed to fire between 0700 and 1630. Upon firing, prescribers were prompted to assess for antibiotic modification – a composite including discontinuation, de-escalation, inclusion of stop-date, and transition to oral therapies. Additional responses were included to defer re-firing for patients deemed not to be a candidate for antibiotic modification. The primary endpoint was defined as the rate of ATO response aligning with antibiotic modification for the 10 most frequently utilized antibiotics and assessed from 10/1/22 – 12/31/22. A predefined subset of patients was evaluated for ATO appropriateness by prescriber specialty and role. RESULTS: A total of 15,383 ATO alerts were included for analysis, corresponding to 3,498 unique patients. The primary endpoint occurred in 21.4% of cases. The most commonly selected ATO response was a reminder in 10 minutes (48.2%). The median time viewing the ATO alert was 5 seconds (IQR 4 – 8s). In a subset of 400 patients, ATO selections were found to be appropriate in 56% of cases. When stratified by prescriber role, attending physicians were more likely to appropriately utilize the ATO compared to resident and advanced practice practitioners (62.7% vs 48.5% vs 46.2%, p = 0.007) and were more likely to select an ATO response aligning with antibiotic modification (39.5% vs 7.6% vs 12.3%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ATO selection corresponding to antibiotic modification was low regardless of prescriber role. Further work optimizing the ATO design will be required to improve integration into stewardship workflow. DISCLOSURES: Joseph L. Kuti, PharmD, bioMeriuex Inc.: Grant/Research Support|Entasis Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Merck & Co, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi Inc: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi Inc: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi Inc: Honoraria Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10676958/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1067 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Ackley, Tyler
Bilinskaya, Anastasia
Kuti, Joseph L
Linder, Kristin E
Dempsey, Casey J
1227. Analysis of Prescriber Interaction with an Electronic Antibiotic Time-out Best Practice Alert
title 1227. Analysis of Prescriber Interaction with an Electronic Antibiotic Time-out Best Practice Alert
title_full 1227. Analysis of Prescriber Interaction with an Electronic Antibiotic Time-out Best Practice Alert
title_fullStr 1227. Analysis of Prescriber Interaction with an Electronic Antibiotic Time-out Best Practice Alert
title_full_unstemmed 1227. Analysis of Prescriber Interaction with an Electronic Antibiotic Time-out Best Practice Alert
title_short 1227. Analysis of Prescriber Interaction with an Electronic Antibiotic Time-out Best Practice Alert
title_sort 1227. analysis of prescriber interaction with an electronic antibiotic time-out best practice alert
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10676958/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1067
work_keys_str_mv AT ackleytyler 1227analysisofprescriberinteractionwithanelectronicantibiotictimeoutbestpracticealert
AT bilinskayaanastasia 1227analysisofprescriberinteractionwithanelectronicantibiotictimeoutbestpracticealert
AT kutijosephl 1227analysisofprescriberinteractionwithanelectronicantibiotictimeoutbestpracticealert
AT linderkristine 1227analysisofprescriberinteractionwithanelectronicantibiotictimeoutbestpracticealert
AT dempseycaseyj 1227analysisofprescriberinteractionwithanelectronicantibiotictimeoutbestpracticealert