Cargando…

880. Diagnostic Testing Sample-Type Preferences: Results From An International Survey On SARS-CoV-2

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic strategies rapidly evolved during the COVID-19 pandemic in response to the unprecedented worldwide testing demand. The public’s perception in regards to testing has also evolved. Testing remains essential for understanding the current state of the pandemic and directing effort...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akbarzada, Sumaira, Narayanan, Nithya, Salzano, Leah, Tobik, Emily R, Megiel, Sarah, Duni, Craig, Choate, Brittany, Harper, Samantha S, Wyllie, Anne L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10676974/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.925
_version_ 1785150020923686912
author Akbarzada, Sumaira
Narayanan, Nithya
Salzano, Leah
Tobik, Emily R
Megiel, Sarah
Duni, Craig
Choate, Brittany
Harper, Samantha S
Wyllie, Anne L
author_facet Akbarzada, Sumaira
Narayanan, Nithya
Salzano, Leah
Tobik, Emily R
Megiel, Sarah
Duni, Craig
Choate, Brittany
Harper, Samantha S
Wyllie, Anne L
author_sort Akbarzada, Sumaira
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnostic strategies rapidly evolved during the COVID-19 pandemic in response to the unprecedented worldwide testing demand. The public’s perception in regards to testing has also evolved. Testing remains essential for understanding the current state of the pandemic and directing efforts and resources. The purpose of this study was to better understand the public view regarding clinical sample types to inform future diagnostics development and surveillance planning. METHODS: To assess SARS-CoV-2 testing preferences, we distributed a Qualtrics survey via social media and email to connections in > 100 countries. The questionnaire covered testing preferences and key demographic information. Python was used to analyze the raw data. RESULTS: From 03/30-11/30/2022, a total of 2,094 responses were received from Africa (22%), Asia (8%), Europe (22%), North America (27%), Latin America and the Caribbean (9%), the Middle East (7%), and Oceania (6%). Participants were 55% female, 44% male, and 1% non-binary and ranged in ages (18-24, 13%; 25-34, 27%; 35-44, 23%; 45-54, 16%; 55-64, 14%; 65+, 8%). Education level and employment was skewed with 52% holding a graduate degree and 26% holding a bachelor’s degree; 27% were scientists/researchers and 29% were healthcare workers. Assuming equal accuracy between COVID-19 test types, respondents most preferred oral sample collection and least preferred methods involving coughing. The most preferred sample collection method varied by region (nasal swab = Europe; oral swab = Africa, North America, Oceania; saliva = Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean). In the majority of regions, saliva based testing was the most preferred method by parents and guardians for their children. CONCLUSION: This study identified a preference for oral sample types for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, with saliva collection from children preferred by parents. Large-scale, easily accessible diagnostic testing is vital for detecting, monitoring, and containing outbreaks of respiratory pathogens; utilization of oral sample types supports the feasibility of this, if individuals are then more likely to test. Results from this study should be considered when new testing practices are designed to encourage maximum participation from individuals and improve community health. DISCLOSURES: Anne L. Wyllie, PhD, Co-Diagnostics: Board Member|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10676974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106769742023-11-27 880. Diagnostic Testing Sample-Type Preferences: Results From An International Survey On SARS-CoV-2 Akbarzada, Sumaira Narayanan, Nithya Salzano, Leah Tobik, Emily R Megiel, Sarah Duni, Craig Choate, Brittany Harper, Samantha S Wyllie, Anne L Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Diagnostic strategies rapidly evolved during the COVID-19 pandemic in response to the unprecedented worldwide testing demand. The public’s perception in regards to testing has also evolved. Testing remains essential for understanding the current state of the pandemic and directing efforts and resources. The purpose of this study was to better understand the public view regarding clinical sample types to inform future diagnostics development and surveillance planning. METHODS: To assess SARS-CoV-2 testing preferences, we distributed a Qualtrics survey via social media and email to connections in > 100 countries. The questionnaire covered testing preferences and key demographic information. Python was used to analyze the raw data. RESULTS: From 03/30-11/30/2022, a total of 2,094 responses were received from Africa (22%), Asia (8%), Europe (22%), North America (27%), Latin America and the Caribbean (9%), the Middle East (7%), and Oceania (6%). Participants were 55% female, 44% male, and 1% non-binary and ranged in ages (18-24, 13%; 25-34, 27%; 35-44, 23%; 45-54, 16%; 55-64, 14%; 65+, 8%). Education level and employment was skewed with 52% holding a graduate degree and 26% holding a bachelor’s degree; 27% were scientists/researchers and 29% were healthcare workers. Assuming equal accuracy between COVID-19 test types, respondents most preferred oral sample collection and least preferred methods involving coughing. The most preferred sample collection method varied by region (nasal swab = Europe; oral swab = Africa, North America, Oceania; saliva = Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean). In the majority of regions, saliva based testing was the most preferred method by parents and guardians for their children. CONCLUSION: This study identified a preference for oral sample types for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, with saliva collection from children preferred by parents. Large-scale, easily accessible diagnostic testing is vital for detecting, monitoring, and containing outbreaks of respiratory pathogens; utilization of oral sample types supports the feasibility of this, if individuals are then more likely to test. Results from this study should be considered when new testing practices are designed to encourage maximum participation from individuals and improve community health. DISCLOSURES: Anne L. Wyllie, PhD, Co-Diagnostics: Board Member|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10676974/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.925 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Akbarzada, Sumaira
Narayanan, Nithya
Salzano, Leah
Tobik, Emily R
Megiel, Sarah
Duni, Craig
Choate, Brittany
Harper, Samantha S
Wyllie, Anne L
880. Diagnostic Testing Sample-Type Preferences: Results From An International Survey On SARS-CoV-2
title 880. Diagnostic Testing Sample-Type Preferences: Results From An International Survey On SARS-CoV-2
title_full 880. Diagnostic Testing Sample-Type Preferences: Results From An International Survey On SARS-CoV-2
title_fullStr 880. Diagnostic Testing Sample-Type Preferences: Results From An International Survey On SARS-CoV-2
title_full_unstemmed 880. Diagnostic Testing Sample-Type Preferences: Results From An International Survey On SARS-CoV-2
title_short 880. Diagnostic Testing Sample-Type Preferences: Results From An International Survey On SARS-CoV-2
title_sort 880. diagnostic testing sample-type preferences: results from an international survey on sars-cov-2
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10676974/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.925
work_keys_str_mv AT akbarzadasumaira 880diagnostictestingsampletypepreferencesresultsfromaninternationalsurveyonsarscov2
AT narayanannithya 880diagnostictestingsampletypepreferencesresultsfromaninternationalsurveyonsarscov2
AT salzanoleah 880diagnostictestingsampletypepreferencesresultsfromaninternationalsurveyonsarscov2
AT tobikemilyr 880diagnostictestingsampletypepreferencesresultsfromaninternationalsurveyonsarscov2
AT megielsarah 880diagnostictestingsampletypepreferencesresultsfromaninternationalsurveyonsarscov2
AT dunicraig 880diagnostictestingsampletypepreferencesresultsfromaninternationalsurveyonsarscov2
AT choatebrittany 880diagnostictestingsampletypepreferencesresultsfromaninternationalsurveyonsarscov2
AT harpersamanthas 880diagnostictestingsampletypepreferencesresultsfromaninternationalsurveyonsarscov2
AT wyllieannel 880diagnostictestingsampletypepreferencesresultsfromaninternationalsurveyonsarscov2