Cargando…

131. Impact of an Algorithm to Triage Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department with Blood Cultures Positive for Staphylococcus aureus or Coagulase-negative Staphylococci

BACKGROUND: Patients may be discharged from the emergency department (ED) prior to final data from blood cultures. When positive, the ED provider must evaluate to determine next steps in caring for the patient. Up to 55% of positive blood cultures can be contaminants, and calling patients back to th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brenneman, Ethan, Theophanous, Rebecca, Mando-Vandrick, Jennifer, Toler, Rachel, Jones, Justin, Keil, Elizabeth, Zhou, Grace, Lee, Hui-Jie, Moehring, Rebekah W, Wrenn, Rebekah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677097/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.204
_version_ 1785150049673543680
author Brenneman, Ethan
Theophanous, Rebecca
Mando-Vandrick, Jennifer
Toler, Rachel
Jones, Justin
Keil, Elizabeth
Zhou, Grace
Lee, Hui-Jie
Moehring, Rebekah W
Wrenn, Rebekah
author_facet Brenneman, Ethan
Theophanous, Rebecca
Mando-Vandrick, Jennifer
Toler, Rachel
Jones, Justin
Keil, Elizabeth
Zhou, Grace
Lee, Hui-Jie
Moehring, Rebekah W
Wrenn, Rebekah
author_sort Brenneman, Ethan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients may be discharged from the emergency department (ED) prior to final data from blood cultures. When positive, the ED provider must evaluate to determine next steps in caring for the patient. Up to 55% of positive blood cultures can be contaminants, and calling patients back to the ED may cause undue burden to the ED if no treatment or further evaluation is needed. We developed a toolkit to assist provider response to positive blood cultures for Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) in patients discharged from the ED. It identifies which patients need to return to the ED (callback) and which do not (likely contaminant). METHODS: We conducted a multi-center, retrospective cohort study of patients with positive blood cultures with staphylococci from January 2019 through October 2022 resulting after discharge from 3 EDs. The objective was to compare the rate of callback to the ED in a retrospective cohort to the rate guided by adhering to a newly developed callback algorithm. The rate of actual callback to ED and the rate of callback to ED based on adhering to the algorithm was calculated with 95% Wilson score binomial confidence intervals (CIs). Asymptotic McNemar’s test was used to compare the paired binomial proportions, and the difference in the rates was estimated with 95% CI using the Newcombe square-and-add approach. RESULTS: Out of 188 patients discharged from the ED with the growth of staphylococci in the blood cultures, the rate of patient callback was 61.2% (115/188, 95% CI 55.2% to 66.8%), compared to the algorithm advised callback rate of 45.7% (86/188, 95% CI 39.9% to 51.7%). The difference between the actual callback and the algorithm-based callback rates was 15.4% (95% CI 9.8% to 20.9%, p< 0.001). CONCLUSION: Implementation of an algorithm-based response to blood cultures can reduce unnecessary callbacks to the ED without compromising patient safety. DISCLOSURES: Rebekah W. Moehring, MD, MPH, FIDSA, FSHEA, UpToDate, Inc.: Author Royalties
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10677097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106770972023-11-27 131. Impact of an Algorithm to Triage Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department with Blood Cultures Positive for Staphylococcus aureus or Coagulase-negative Staphylococci Brenneman, Ethan Theophanous, Rebecca Mando-Vandrick, Jennifer Toler, Rachel Jones, Justin Keil, Elizabeth Zhou, Grace Lee, Hui-Jie Moehring, Rebekah W Wrenn, Rebekah Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Patients may be discharged from the emergency department (ED) prior to final data from blood cultures. When positive, the ED provider must evaluate to determine next steps in caring for the patient. Up to 55% of positive blood cultures can be contaminants, and calling patients back to the ED may cause undue burden to the ED if no treatment or further evaluation is needed. We developed a toolkit to assist provider response to positive blood cultures for Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) in patients discharged from the ED. It identifies which patients need to return to the ED (callback) and which do not (likely contaminant). METHODS: We conducted a multi-center, retrospective cohort study of patients with positive blood cultures with staphylococci from January 2019 through October 2022 resulting after discharge from 3 EDs. The objective was to compare the rate of callback to the ED in a retrospective cohort to the rate guided by adhering to a newly developed callback algorithm. The rate of actual callback to ED and the rate of callback to ED based on adhering to the algorithm was calculated with 95% Wilson score binomial confidence intervals (CIs). Asymptotic McNemar’s test was used to compare the paired binomial proportions, and the difference in the rates was estimated with 95% CI using the Newcombe square-and-add approach. RESULTS: Out of 188 patients discharged from the ED with the growth of staphylococci in the blood cultures, the rate of patient callback was 61.2% (115/188, 95% CI 55.2% to 66.8%), compared to the algorithm advised callback rate of 45.7% (86/188, 95% CI 39.9% to 51.7%). The difference between the actual callback and the algorithm-based callback rates was 15.4% (95% CI 9.8% to 20.9%, p< 0.001). CONCLUSION: Implementation of an algorithm-based response to blood cultures can reduce unnecessary callbacks to the ED without compromising patient safety. DISCLOSURES: Rebekah W. Moehring, MD, MPH, FIDSA, FSHEA, UpToDate, Inc.: Author Royalties Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10677097/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.204 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Brenneman, Ethan
Theophanous, Rebecca
Mando-Vandrick, Jennifer
Toler, Rachel
Jones, Justin
Keil, Elizabeth
Zhou, Grace
Lee, Hui-Jie
Moehring, Rebekah W
Wrenn, Rebekah
131. Impact of an Algorithm to Triage Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department with Blood Cultures Positive for Staphylococcus aureus or Coagulase-negative Staphylococci
title 131. Impact of an Algorithm to Triage Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department with Blood Cultures Positive for Staphylococcus aureus or Coagulase-negative Staphylococci
title_full 131. Impact of an Algorithm to Triage Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department with Blood Cultures Positive for Staphylococcus aureus or Coagulase-negative Staphylococci
title_fullStr 131. Impact of an Algorithm to Triage Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department with Blood Cultures Positive for Staphylococcus aureus or Coagulase-negative Staphylococci
title_full_unstemmed 131. Impact of an Algorithm to Triage Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department with Blood Cultures Positive for Staphylococcus aureus or Coagulase-negative Staphylococci
title_short 131. Impact of an Algorithm to Triage Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department with Blood Cultures Positive for Staphylococcus aureus or Coagulase-negative Staphylococci
title_sort 131. impact of an algorithm to triage patients discharged from the emergency department with blood cultures positive for staphylococcus aureus or coagulase-negative staphylococci
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677097/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.204
work_keys_str_mv AT brennemanethan 131impactofanalgorithmtotriagepatientsdischargedfromtheemergencydepartmentwithbloodculturespositiveforstaphylococcusaureusorcoagulasenegativestaphylococci
AT theophanousrebecca 131impactofanalgorithmtotriagepatientsdischargedfromtheemergencydepartmentwithbloodculturespositiveforstaphylococcusaureusorcoagulasenegativestaphylococci
AT mandovandrickjennifer 131impactofanalgorithmtotriagepatientsdischargedfromtheemergencydepartmentwithbloodculturespositiveforstaphylococcusaureusorcoagulasenegativestaphylococci
AT tolerrachel 131impactofanalgorithmtotriagepatientsdischargedfromtheemergencydepartmentwithbloodculturespositiveforstaphylococcusaureusorcoagulasenegativestaphylococci
AT jonesjustin 131impactofanalgorithmtotriagepatientsdischargedfromtheemergencydepartmentwithbloodculturespositiveforstaphylococcusaureusorcoagulasenegativestaphylococci
AT keilelizabeth 131impactofanalgorithmtotriagepatientsdischargedfromtheemergencydepartmentwithbloodculturespositiveforstaphylococcusaureusorcoagulasenegativestaphylococci
AT zhougrace 131impactofanalgorithmtotriagepatientsdischargedfromtheemergencydepartmentwithbloodculturespositiveforstaphylococcusaureusorcoagulasenegativestaphylococci
AT leehuijie 131impactofanalgorithmtotriagepatientsdischargedfromtheemergencydepartmentwithbloodculturespositiveforstaphylococcusaureusorcoagulasenegativestaphylococci
AT moehringrebekahw 131impactofanalgorithmtotriagepatientsdischargedfromtheemergencydepartmentwithbloodculturespositiveforstaphylococcusaureusorcoagulasenegativestaphylococci
AT wrennrebekah 131impactofanalgorithmtotriagepatientsdischargedfromtheemergencydepartmentwithbloodculturespositiveforstaphylococcusaureusorcoagulasenegativestaphylococci