Cargando…
2118. Comparative Analysis of Cefiderocol Mono- and Combination Therapy for Multi-Drug Resistant Gram-negative Infections
BACKGROUND: Multi-drug resistant gram-negative infections are a growing concern, necessitating the development of novel treatments. Cefiderocol (CFDC) is a new siderophore cephalosporin that targets the iron transport mechanism used by many gram-negative pathogens. We aimed to compare the clinical o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677134/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1741 |
_version_ | 1785150058295984128 |
---|---|
author | Ghali, Amer El Kunz-coyne, Ashlan Lucas, Kristen Tieman, Molly Purdy, Andrew Iturralde, Gabriela Garcia, Esther Holger, Dana Lau, Suet-Ping Xhemali, Xhilda Veve, Michael P Rybak, Michael J |
author_facet | Ghali, Amer El Kunz-coyne, Ashlan Lucas, Kristen Tieman, Molly Purdy, Andrew Iturralde, Gabriela Garcia, Esther Holger, Dana Lau, Suet-Ping Xhemali, Xhilda Veve, Michael P Rybak, Michael J |
author_sort | Ghali, Amer El |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Multi-drug resistant gram-negative infections are a growing concern, necessitating the development of novel treatments. Cefiderocol (CFDC) is a new siderophore cephalosporin that targets the iron transport mechanism used by many gram-negative pathogens. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of CFDC monotherapy and combination therapy in various infection types. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis at 5 academic medical centers from May 2022 to April 2023. Patients were included if they were ≥18 years old and received CFDC for ≥48 hours, excluding subsequent courses not separated by ≥90 days. The primary objective was composite clinical success (30-day survival, absence of 30-day infection recurrence and resolution of signs and symptoms), with secondary objectives including individual components of clinical success, on-treatment resistance, 30-day readmission, and adverse reactions. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used. RESULTS: We analyzed 70 patients, with 35 in each treatment group. The cohort was predominantly male (64.3%), had a mean age of 55.5 years (17.6), and 67% were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. The mean (SD) APACHE II scores were 12.8 (7.5) for monotherapy and 14.9 (6.7) for combination therapy (p=0.22), while the mean (SD) Charlson comorbidity scores were 5.0 (3.6) and 4.5 (3.5) for the respective groups (p=0.61). The most common infection source was respiratory tract (54.3%), with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (55.7%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (25.7%) as the most frequently isolated pathogens. The median (IQR) CFDC mean inhibitory concentration (MIC) was 0.5 µg/mL (0.25-1.0). The 30-day mortality rates for the monotherapy and combination groups were 20% and 28.6%, respectively. There was no significant difference in composite clinical success between the groups (p=0.59). CONCLUSION: Our preliminary data suggest that there is no difference in clinical success between CFDC monotherapy and combination therapy with another antibiotic. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate the optimal use of CFDC in a variety of clinical settings. DISCLOSURES: Michael J. Rybak, PharmD, PhD, MPH, Abbvie, Merck, Paratek, Shionogi, Entasis, La Jolla, T2 Biosystems: Advisor/Consultant |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10677134 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106771342023-11-27 2118. Comparative Analysis of Cefiderocol Mono- and Combination Therapy for Multi-Drug Resistant Gram-negative Infections Ghali, Amer El Kunz-coyne, Ashlan Lucas, Kristen Tieman, Molly Purdy, Andrew Iturralde, Gabriela Garcia, Esther Holger, Dana Lau, Suet-Ping Xhemali, Xhilda Veve, Michael P Rybak, Michael J Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Multi-drug resistant gram-negative infections are a growing concern, necessitating the development of novel treatments. Cefiderocol (CFDC) is a new siderophore cephalosporin that targets the iron transport mechanism used by many gram-negative pathogens. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of CFDC monotherapy and combination therapy in various infection types. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis at 5 academic medical centers from May 2022 to April 2023. Patients were included if they were ≥18 years old and received CFDC for ≥48 hours, excluding subsequent courses not separated by ≥90 days. The primary objective was composite clinical success (30-day survival, absence of 30-day infection recurrence and resolution of signs and symptoms), with secondary objectives including individual components of clinical success, on-treatment resistance, 30-day readmission, and adverse reactions. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used. RESULTS: We analyzed 70 patients, with 35 in each treatment group. The cohort was predominantly male (64.3%), had a mean age of 55.5 years (17.6), and 67% were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. The mean (SD) APACHE II scores were 12.8 (7.5) for monotherapy and 14.9 (6.7) for combination therapy (p=0.22), while the mean (SD) Charlson comorbidity scores were 5.0 (3.6) and 4.5 (3.5) for the respective groups (p=0.61). The most common infection source was respiratory tract (54.3%), with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (55.7%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (25.7%) as the most frequently isolated pathogens. The median (IQR) CFDC mean inhibitory concentration (MIC) was 0.5 µg/mL (0.25-1.0). The 30-day mortality rates for the monotherapy and combination groups were 20% and 28.6%, respectively. There was no significant difference in composite clinical success between the groups (p=0.59). CONCLUSION: Our preliminary data suggest that there is no difference in clinical success between CFDC monotherapy and combination therapy with another antibiotic. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate the optimal use of CFDC in a variety of clinical settings. DISCLOSURES: Michael J. Rybak, PharmD, PhD, MPH, Abbvie, Merck, Paratek, Shionogi, Entasis, La Jolla, T2 Biosystems: Advisor/Consultant Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10677134/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1741 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstract Ghali, Amer El Kunz-coyne, Ashlan Lucas, Kristen Tieman, Molly Purdy, Andrew Iturralde, Gabriela Garcia, Esther Holger, Dana Lau, Suet-Ping Xhemali, Xhilda Veve, Michael P Rybak, Michael J 2118. Comparative Analysis of Cefiderocol Mono- and Combination Therapy for Multi-Drug Resistant Gram-negative Infections |
title | 2118. Comparative Analysis of Cefiderocol Mono- and Combination Therapy for Multi-Drug Resistant Gram-negative Infections |
title_full | 2118. Comparative Analysis of Cefiderocol Mono- and Combination Therapy for Multi-Drug Resistant Gram-negative Infections |
title_fullStr | 2118. Comparative Analysis of Cefiderocol Mono- and Combination Therapy for Multi-Drug Resistant Gram-negative Infections |
title_full_unstemmed | 2118. Comparative Analysis of Cefiderocol Mono- and Combination Therapy for Multi-Drug Resistant Gram-negative Infections |
title_short | 2118. Comparative Analysis of Cefiderocol Mono- and Combination Therapy for Multi-Drug Resistant Gram-negative Infections |
title_sort | 2118. comparative analysis of cefiderocol mono- and combination therapy for multi-drug resistant gram-negative infections |
topic | Abstract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677134/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1741 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ghaliamerel 2118comparativeanalysisofcefiderocolmonoandcombinationtherapyformultidrugresistantgramnegativeinfections AT kunzcoyneashlan 2118comparativeanalysisofcefiderocolmonoandcombinationtherapyformultidrugresistantgramnegativeinfections AT lucaskristen 2118comparativeanalysisofcefiderocolmonoandcombinationtherapyformultidrugresistantgramnegativeinfections AT tiemanmolly 2118comparativeanalysisofcefiderocolmonoandcombinationtherapyformultidrugresistantgramnegativeinfections AT purdyandrew 2118comparativeanalysisofcefiderocolmonoandcombinationtherapyformultidrugresistantgramnegativeinfections AT iturraldegabriela 2118comparativeanalysisofcefiderocolmonoandcombinationtherapyformultidrugresistantgramnegativeinfections AT garciaesther 2118comparativeanalysisofcefiderocolmonoandcombinationtherapyformultidrugresistantgramnegativeinfections AT holgerdana 2118comparativeanalysisofcefiderocolmonoandcombinationtherapyformultidrugresistantgramnegativeinfections AT lausuetping 2118comparativeanalysisofcefiderocolmonoandcombinationtherapyformultidrugresistantgramnegativeinfections AT xhemalixhilda 2118comparativeanalysisofcefiderocolmonoandcombinationtherapyformultidrugresistantgramnegativeinfections AT vevemichaelp 2118comparativeanalysisofcefiderocolmonoandcombinationtherapyformultidrugresistantgramnegativeinfections AT rybakmichaelj 2118comparativeanalysisofcefiderocolmonoandcombinationtherapyformultidrugresistantgramnegativeinfections |