Cargando…
568. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 XL Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Non-fermenter Gram-Negative Bacilli: The Importance of Continuing to Monitor AST Systems
BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA), Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex (ACB), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (SM) are difficult-to-treat pathogens contributing significantly to mortality. Monitoring the accuracy of automated susceptibility (S) systems like VITEK 2 against contempo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677167/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.637 |
_version_ | 1785150066235801600 |
---|---|
author | Carvalhaes, Cecilia G Rhomberg, Paul Veeder, Nathan Gurung, Nabina Castanheira, Mariana |
author_facet | Carvalhaes, Cecilia G Rhomberg, Paul Veeder, Nathan Gurung, Nabina Castanheira, Mariana |
author_sort | Carvalhaes, Cecilia G |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA), Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex (ACB), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (SM) are difficult-to-treat pathogens contributing significantly to mortality. Monitoring the accuracy of automated susceptibility (S) systems like VITEK 2 against contemporaneous clinical isolates is crucial. This study compared VITEK2 to the broth microdilution method (BMD) when reporting S results against a challenge set of NF-GNB isolates. [Figure: see text] METHODS: A challenge set of PSA (62 isolates; 21 carbapenem-resistant [CR] and 20 cefepime [CEP]-R), ACB (64; 21-CR and 21 CEP-R), and SM (33; 11 trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole [TS]-R) were collected (1/patient) in 2019–2021 from 43 medical centers located in 9 US Census Divisions and identified by MALDI-TOF MS. Isolates were S tested by VITEK 2 (AST-N802+XN15 cards) and CLSI BMD. A total of 1,737 isolate/antimicrobial (ATM) combinations were evaluated for essential (EA) and categorical (CA) agreements and error rates. FDA-approved VITEK 2 breakpoints were applied to both methods to mimic the real-world practice. RESULTS: Overall, VITEK 2 EA/CA rates were 90.6%/87.0%. Additionally, EA/CA rates were 93.1%/87.8%, 88.6%/86.3%, and 86.9%/86.9% for PSA, ACB, and SM, respectively. The EA/CA rates for each ATM and organism combination are displayed in the Table. All ATMs showed > 90% EA against PSA, except amikacin (AMK), imipenem, and ciprofloxacin (CIP). However, CA rates >90% were noted for AMK, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, CIP, tobramycin, and gentamycin against PSA. VITEK 2 CA rates for all other ATMs tested against PSA ranged from 79.0% to 88.7%. All ATMs but ampicillin-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, CEF, and ceftazidime exhibited EA and CA rates > 90% against ACB. Minocycline and TS showed > 90% EA and CA rates against SM, but rates were lower for levofloxacin (EA/CA, 75.8%/72.7%). CONCLUSION: The collection of NF-GNB pathogens tested in this study have been designated serious threats, so accurate AST results are critical for diagnostic stewardship. VITEK 2 EA/CA rates were > 90% for most of ATMs tested against this challenging collection of NF-GNB; however, β-lactam agents showed CA rates < 88% against PSA (80% of discordances were minor errors). DISCLOSURES: Cecilia G. Carvalhaes, MD, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|bioMerieux: Grant/Research Support|Cipla: Grant/Research Support|CorMedix: Grant/Research Support|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Paul Rhomberg, BS, MT(ASCP), bioMerieux: Grant/Research Support|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Nathan Veeder, AA, bioMerieux: Grant/Research Support Nabina Gurung, n/a, bioMerieux: Grant/Research Support Mariana Castanheira, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|Basilea: Grant/Research Support|bioMerieux: Grant/Research Support|Cipla: Grant/Research Support|CorMedix: Grant/Research Support|Entasis: Grant/Research Support|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Paratek: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10677167 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106771672023-11-27 568. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 XL Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Non-fermenter Gram-Negative Bacilli: The Importance of Continuing to Monitor AST Systems Carvalhaes, Cecilia G Rhomberg, Paul Veeder, Nathan Gurung, Nabina Castanheira, Mariana Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA), Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex (ACB), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (SM) are difficult-to-treat pathogens contributing significantly to mortality. Monitoring the accuracy of automated susceptibility (S) systems like VITEK 2 against contemporaneous clinical isolates is crucial. This study compared VITEK2 to the broth microdilution method (BMD) when reporting S results against a challenge set of NF-GNB isolates. [Figure: see text] METHODS: A challenge set of PSA (62 isolates; 21 carbapenem-resistant [CR] and 20 cefepime [CEP]-R), ACB (64; 21-CR and 21 CEP-R), and SM (33; 11 trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole [TS]-R) were collected (1/patient) in 2019–2021 from 43 medical centers located in 9 US Census Divisions and identified by MALDI-TOF MS. Isolates were S tested by VITEK 2 (AST-N802+XN15 cards) and CLSI BMD. A total of 1,737 isolate/antimicrobial (ATM) combinations were evaluated for essential (EA) and categorical (CA) agreements and error rates. FDA-approved VITEK 2 breakpoints were applied to both methods to mimic the real-world practice. RESULTS: Overall, VITEK 2 EA/CA rates were 90.6%/87.0%. Additionally, EA/CA rates were 93.1%/87.8%, 88.6%/86.3%, and 86.9%/86.9% for PSA, ACB, and SM, respectively. The EA/CA rates for each ATM and organism combination are displayed in the Table. All ATMs showed > 90% EA against PSA, except amikacin (AMK), imipenem, and ciprofloxacin (CIP). However, CA rates >90% were noted for AMK, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, CIP, tobramycin, and gentamycin against PSA. VITEK 2 CA rates for all other ATMs tested against PSA ranged from 79.0% to 88.7%. All ATMs but ampicillin-sulbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, CEF, and ceftazidime exhibited EA and CA rates > 90% against ACB. Minocycline and TS showed > 90% EA and CA rates against SM, but rates were lower for levofloxacin (EA/CA, 75.8%/72.7%). CONCLUSION: The collection of NF-GNB pathogens tested in this study have been designated serious threats, so accurate AST results are critical for diagnostic stewardship. VITEK 2 EA/CA rates were > 90% for most of ATMs tested against this challenging collection of NF-GNB; however, β-lactam agents showed CA rates < 88% against PSA (80% of discordances were minor errors). DISCLOSURES: Cecilia G. Carvalhaes, MD, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|bioMerieux: Grant/Research Support|Cipla: Grant/Research Support|CorMedix: Grant/Research Support|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Paul Rhomberg, BS, MT(ASCP), bioMerieux: Grant/Research Support|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Nathan Veeder, AA, bioMerieux: Grant/Research Support Nabina Gurung, n/a, bioMerieux: Grant/Research Support Mariana Castanheira, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|Basilea: Grant/Research Support|bioMerieux: Grant/Research Support|Cipla: Grant/Research Support|CorMedix: Grant/Research Support|Entasis: Grant/Research Support|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Paratek: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10677167/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.637 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstract Carvalhaes, Cecilia G Rhomberg, Paul Veeder, Nathan Gurung, Nabina Castanheira, Mariana 568. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 XL Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Non-fermenter Gram-Negative Bacilli: The Importance of Continuing to Monitor AST Systems |
title | 568. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 XL Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Non-fermenter Gram-Negative Bacilli: The Importance of Continuing to Monitor AST Systems |
title_full | 568. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 XL Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Non-fermenter Gram-Negative Bacilli: The Importance of Continuing to Monitor AST Systems |
title_fullStr | 568. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 XL Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Non-fermenter Gram-Negative Bacilli: The Importance of Continuing to Monitor AST Systems |
title_full_unstemmed | 568. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 XL Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Non-fermenter Gram-Negative Bacilli: The Importance of Continuing to Monitor AST Systems |
title_short | 568. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 XL Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for Non-fermenter Gram-Negative Bacilli: The Importance of Continuing to Monitor AST Systems |
title_sort | 568. evaluation of the vitek 2 xl antimicrobial susceptibility testing for non-fermenter gram-negative bacilli: the importance of continuing to monitor ast systems |
topic | Abstract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677167/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.637 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carvalhaesceciliag 568evaluationofthevitek2xlantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingfornonfermentergramnegativebacillitheimportanceofcontinuingtomonitorastsystems AT rhombergpaul 568evaluationofthevitek2xlantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingfornonfermentergramnegativebacillitheimportanceofcontinuingtomonitorastsystems AT veedernathan 568evaluationofthevitek2xlantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingfornonfermentergramnegativebacillitheimportanceofcontinuingtomonitorastsystems AT gurungnabina 568evaluationofthevitek2xlantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingfornonfermentergramnegativebacillitheimportanceofcontinuingtomonitorastsystems AT castanheiramariana 568evaluationofthevitek2xlantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingfornonfermentergramnegativebacillitheimportanceofcontinuingtomonitorastsystems |