Cargando…

2279. Appropriateness of Antibiotic Prescribing Before vs. After Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Suppression in Culture Reports: A Quasi-experimental Study

BACKGROUND: Culture and susceptibility results are essential to identify the offending organism and optimize antibiotic treatment; hence, decrease the emergence of antibiotic resistance and achieve better clinical outcomes. Antibiotic prescribers should learn how to interpret MIC breakpoints to pres...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aljedaani, Huda Jamaan, Thabit, Abrar K, Al Munjem, Manea, Bazuqamah, Mohammed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677207/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1901
_version_ 1785150075577565184
author Aljedaani, Huda Jamaan
Thabit, Abrar K
Al Munjem, Manea
Bazuqamah, Mohammed
author_facet Aljedaani, Huda Jamaan
Thabit, Abrar K
Al Munjem, Manea
Bazuqamah, Mohammed
author_sort Aljedaani, Huda Jamaan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Culture and susceptibility results are essential to identify the offending organism and optimize antibiotic treatment; hence, decrease the emergence of antibiotic resistance and achieve better clinical outcomes. Antibiotic prescribers should learn how to interpret MIC breakpoints to prescribe a suitable antibiotic as different antibiotics have different MIC breakpoints against different microorganisms. No study to date has evaluated the impact of MIC suppression in culture reports while keeping interpretation results on the appropriateness of antibiotics choice by non-infectious diseases prescribers. We assessed the impact of MIC suppression on the appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions. METHODS: This was a quasi-experimental study (pre-post intervention) that was conducted over 14 months on hospitalized patients in the medical floor who had a symptomatic infection with a positive culture and were prescribed a full course of definitive antibiotics by prescribers not specialized in infectious diseases pre and post MIC suppression in culture reports. The primary outcome was appropriateness of antibiotic selection (the de-escalation to the narrowest spectrum antibiotic to which the organism is susceptible with appropriate dose). Secondary outcomes were clinical cure (resolution of signs and symptoms, including defervescence and normalization of white blood cells count), length of stay (LOS), and antibiotics expenditure as defined daily dose (DDD) per 1,000 patient days and days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 patient days. RESULTS: 100 patients were included, 50 in each phase. No difference was observed in the baseline characteristics, including age, sex, infection site, isolated organism, and prescribers’ departments. Appropriate antibiotic selection was significantly higher in the post-intervention phase compared to the pre-intervention phase (62% vs. 40%; P=0.028). LOS was shorter in the post-intervention phase compared to the pre-intervention phase (5 vs. 9.5 days; P=0.011). No difference was reported in the other outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that suppressing MIC values from cultures reports was helpful in choosing the appropriate antibiotic and minimizing the LOS. Future research is needed to confirm these findings. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10677207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106772072023-11-27 2279. Appropriateness of Antibiotic Prescribing Before vs. After Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Suppression in Culture Reports: A Quasi-experimental Study Aljedaani, Huda Jamaan Thabit, Abrar K Al Munjem, Manea Bazuqamah, Mohammed Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Culture and susceptibility results are essential to identify the offending organism and optimize antibiotic treatment; hence, decrease the emergence of antibiotic resistance and achieve better clinical outcomes. Antibiotic prescribers should learn how to interpret MIC breakpoints to prescribe a suitable antibiotic as different antibiotics have different MIC breakpoints against different microorganisms. No study to date has evaluated the impact of MIC suppression in culture reports while keeping interpretation results on the appropriateness of antibiotics choice by non-infectious diseases prescribers. We assessed the impact of MIC suppression on the appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions. METHODS: This was a quasi-experimental study (pre-post intervention) that was conducted over 14 months on hospitalized patients in the medical floor who had a symptomatic infection with a positive culture and were prescribed a full course of definitive antibiotics by prescribers not specialized in infectious diseases pre and post MIC suppression in culture reports. The primary outcome was appropriateness of antibiotic selection (the de-escalation to the narrowest spectrum antibiotic to which the organism is susceptible with appropriate dose). Secondary outcomes were clinical cure (resolution of signs and symptoms, including defervescence and normalization of white blood cells count), length of stay (LOS), and antibiotics expenditure as defined daily dose (DDD) per 1,000 patient days and days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 patient days. RESULTS: 100 patients were included, 50 in each phase. No difference was observed in the baseline characteristics, including age, sex, infection site, isolated organism, and prescribers’ departments. Appropriate antibiotic selection was significantly higher in the post-intervention phase compared to the pre-intervention phase (62% vs. 40%; P=0.028). LOS was shorter in the post-intervention phase compared to the pre-intervention phase (5 vs. 9.5 days; P=0.011). No difference was reported in the other outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that suppressing MIC values from cultures reports was helpful in choosing the appropriate antibiotic and minimizing the LOS. Future research is needed to confirm these findings. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10677207/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1901 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Aljedaani, Huda Jamaan
Thabit, Abrar K
Al Munjem, Manea
Bazuqamah, Mohammed
2279. Appropriateness of Antibiotic Prescribing Before vs. After Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Suppression in Culture Reports: A Quasi-experimental Study
title 2279. Appropriateness of Antibiotic Prescribing Before vs. After Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Suppression in Culture Reports: A Quasi-experimental Study
title_full 2279. Appropriateness of Antibiotic Prescribing Before vs. After Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Suppression in Culture Reports: A Quasi-experimental Study
title_fullStr 2279. Appropriateness of Antibiotic Prescribing Before vs. After Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Suppression in Culture Reports: A Quasi-experimental Study
title_full_unstemmed 2279. Appropriateness of Antibiotic Prescribing Before vs. After Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Suppression in Culture Reports: A Quasi-experimental Study
title_short 2279. Appropriateness of Antibiotic Prescribing Before vs. After Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Suppression in Culture Reports: A Quasi-experimental Study
title_sort 2279. appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing before vs. after minimum inhibitory concentration (mic) suppression in culture reports: a quasi-experimental study
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677207/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1901
work_keys_str_mv AT aljedaanihudajamaan 2279appropriatenessofantibioticprescribingbeforevsafterminimuminhibitoryconcentrationmicsuppressioninculturereportsaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT thabitabrark 2279appropriatenessofantibioticprescribingbeforevsafterminimuminhibitoryconcentrationmicsuppressioninculturereportsaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT almunjemmanea 2279appropriatenessofantibioticprescribingbeforevsafterminimuminhibitoryconcentrationmicsuppressioninculturereportsaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT bazuqamahmohammed 2279appropriatenessofantibioticprescribingbeforevsafterminimuminhibitoryconcentrationmicsuppressioninculturereportsaquasiexperimentalstudy