Cargando…
2610. Home Administration of Intranasal Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine: A Review of Current Evidence and Potential for Meeting Vaccination Targets
BACKGROUND: During the 2010–2021 influenza seasons, vaccination coverage was below the 70% target for the United States at 33.4–58.6% among children and 50.2% among adults.[1, 2] The live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) is currently approved for healthcare professional administration (HCPA); how...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677229/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2224 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: During the 2010–2021 influenza seasons, vaccination coverage was below the 70% target for the United States at 33.4–58.6% among children and 50.2% among adults.[1, 2] The live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) is currently approved for healthcare professional administration (HCPA); however, self- and home-administered LAIVs may provide an additional, effective option for vaccine administration, which could expand seasonal influenza vaccine accessibility. LAIV is a quadrivalent influenza vaccine administered intranasally, with comparable effectiveness to the inactivated influenza vaccine.[3] Broadening vaccine availability to multiple vaccination sites has been shown to increase vaccination rates by up to 22%.[4] Here we summarize the current evidence on self- and home-administered LAIV efficacy and safety, and potential applications for increasing community influenza vaccination accessibility. METHODS: Publications evaluating the efficacy, safety, and practicality of self- and home-administered LAIV were identified from a literature search with the following search string: (live attenuated influenza vaccine OR LAIV) AND (home administration OR self administration OR self immuni*). RESULTS: In three studies comparing LAIV self- and home administration to HCPA (Table), home administration was preferred by 64, 74, and 96% of participants. Sample sizes ranged from 41 children to 4561 patients receiving LAIV, with participants aged between 2.6 and 64 years old. A trial of 4561 patients comparing LAIV self- and home administration to HCPA groups found similar effectiveness against influenza-like illness, immunogenicity, and adverse events post-vaccination. [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Evidence suggests that self- and home-administered LAIV could be safely and effectively offered, and may be preferable for a subset of the population, which could expand seasonal influenza vaccine accessibility. References [1] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Flu vaccination coverage, United States, 2020–21 influenza season. [2] Gates DM et al. Vaccine. 2022;40(44):6337-6343. [3] Bandell A et al. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020;7(Suppl 1):S709. [4] Ipsos. Expanding flu vaccine access. DISCLOSURES: Ravi Jhaveri, MD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|AliOS: Grant/Research Support|AstraZeneca: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead: Grant/Research Support|MedImmune: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Saol Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant|Seqirus: Advisor/Consultant Allyn R. Bandell, PharmD, AstraZeneca: employee|AstraZeneca: Stocks/Bonds |
---|