Cargando…

2671. The Sexual Health Clinic Mpox Response in King County, Washington, May–October 2022

BACKGROUND: Sexual health clinics, vital to the 2022 mpox outbreak response, were challenged by high patient volumes and delayed access to vaccines and tecovirimat. We describe the Public Health - Seattle King County Sexual Health Clinic (SHC) response, including vaccine and tecovirimat distribution...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karmarkar, Ellora, Cannon, Chase, Ramchandani, Meena, Golden, Matthew R, Dombrowski, Julia C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677250/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2282
_version_ 1785150085600903168
author Karmarkar, Ellora
Cannon, Chase
Ramchandani, Meena
Golden, Matthew R
Dombrowski, Julia C
author_facet Karmarkar, Ellora
Cannon, Chase
Ramchandani, Meena
Golden, Matthew R
Dombrowski, Julia C
author_sort Karmarkar, Ellora
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sexual health clinics, vital to the 2022 mpox outbreak response, were challenged by high patient volumes and delayed access to vaccines and tecovirimat. We describe the Public Health - Seattle King County Sexual Health Clinic (SHC) response, including vaccine and tecovirimat distribution, from 5/23/22 (first case in King County) to 10/14/22. METHODS: SHC began vaccinations in clinic on 7/4/22 and implemented a mass vaccination clinic on 7/25/22. Tecovirimat prescriptions initially required positive test results; by 7/29/22 SHC offered same-day presumptive treatment based on clinical suspicion. We calculated vaccines administered per week, proportion of visits related to mpox evaluation, and collected and summarized demographic and clinical data for diagnosed mpox cases. We assessed temporal trends in treatment type (presumptive vs results-based) using Kruskal-Wallis testing and differences in treatment receipt by race/ethnicity using chi-square testing (p< 0.05). RESULTS: From 5/23/22 to 10/14/22, SHC provided ≥1 vaccine dose to 9,753 people; the highest number within a week (n=1,537) were provided the week of 8/1/22 (Figure 1). Of 4,845 clinic visits, 486 (10%) patients were evaluated and tested for mpox; 174 (36%) were positive, comprising 36% of cases in King County at the time. 94% were cisgender men; 57% were White. 74 (43%) had severe symptoms including proctitis, hematochezia, or need for adjunctive pain control. Of 172 patients with complete clinical data, 154 (90%) received tecovirimat, including 83 (54%) treated presumptively. Provision of presumptive treatment increased significantly over time (P< 0.001) (Figure 2). Treatment receipt did not differ significantly by race/ethnicity (P=0.4). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: The SHC substantially expanded vaccine access, served over 1/3 of patients with mpox in King County, and expedited mpox treatment through presumptive therapy, while continuing general sexual health services for patients within the county. DISCLOSURES: Chase Cannon, MD MPH, Roche Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant Julia C. Dombrowski, MD, MPH, Hologic: Grant/Research Support|Mayne Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10677250
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106772502023-11-27 2671. The Sexual Health Clinic Mpox Response in King County, Washington, May–October 2022 Karmarkar, Ellora Cannon, Chase Ramchandani, Meena Golden, Matthew R Dombrowski, Julia C Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Sexual health clinics, vital to the 2022 mpox outbreak response, were challenged by high patient volumes and delayed access to vaccines and tecovirimat. We describe the Public Health - Seattle King County Sexual Health Clinic (SHC) response, including vaccine and tecovirimat distribution, from 5/23/22 (first case in King County) to 10/14/22. METHODS: SHC began vaccinations in clinic on 7/4/22 and implemented a mass vaccination clinic on 7/25/22. Tecovirimat prescriptions initially required positive test results; by 7/29/22 SHC offered same-day presumptive treatment based on clinical suspicion. We calculated vaccines administered per week, proportion of visits related to mpox evaluation, and collected and summarized demographic and clinical data for diagnosed mpox cases. We assessed temporal trends in treatment type (presumptive vs results-based) using Kruskal-Wallis testing and differences in treatment receipt by race/ethnicity using chi-square testing (p< 0.05). RESULTS: From 5/23/22 to 10/14/22, SHC provided ≥1 vaccine dose to 9,753 people; the highest number within a week (n=1,537) were provided the week of 8/1/22 (Figure 1). Of 4,845 clinic visits, 486 (10%) patients were evaluated and tested for mpox; 174 (36%) were positive, comprising 36% of cases in King County at the time. 94% were cisgender men; 57% were White. 74 (43%) had severe symptoms including proctitis, hematochezia, or need for adjunctive pain control. Of 172 patients with complete clinical data, 154 (90%) received tecovirimat, including 83 (54%) treated presumptively. Provision of presumptive treatment increased significantly over time (P< 0.001) (Figure 2). Treatment receipt did not differ significantly by race/ethnicity (P=0.4). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: The SHC substantially expanded vaccine access, served over 1/3 of patients with mpox in King County, and expedited mpox treatment through presumptive therapy, while continuing general sexual health services for patients within the county. DISCLOSURES: Chase Cannon, MD MPH, Roche Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant Julia C. Dombrowski, MD, MPH, Hologic: Grant/Research Support|Mayne Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10677250/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2282 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Karmarkar, Ellora
Cannon, Chase
Ramchandani, Meena
Golden, Matthew R
Dombrowski, Julia C
2671. The Sexual Health Clinic Mpox Response in King County, Washington, May–October 2022
title 2671. The Sexual Health Clinic Mpox Response in King County, Washington, May–October 2022
title_full 2671. The Sexual Health Clinic Mpox Response in King County, Washington, May–October 2022
title_fullStr 2671. The Sexual Health Clinic Mpox Response in King County, Washington, May–October 2022
title_full_unstemmed 2671. The Sexual Health Clinic Mpox Response in King County, Washington, May–October 2022
title_short 2671. The Sexual Health Clinic Mpox Response in King County, Washington, May–October 2022
title_sort 2671. the sexual health clinic mpox response in king county, washington, may–october 2022
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677250/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2282
work_keys_str_mv AT karmarkarellora 2671thesexualhealthclinicmpoxresponseinkingcountywashingtonmayoctober2022
AT cannonchase 2671thesexualhealthclinicmpoxresponseinkingcountywashingtonmayoctober2022
AT ramchandanimeena 2671thesexualhealthclinicmpoxresponseinkingcountywashingtonmayoctober2022
AT goldenmatthewr 2671thesexualhealthclinicmpoxresponseinkingcountywashingtonmayoctober2022
AT dombrowskijuliac 2671thesexualhealthclinicmpoxresponseinkingcountywashingtonmayoctober2022