Cargando…

2554. What’s Weight Got to Do with It? Prospective Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Fixed-Dose Daptomycin

BACKGROUND: As daptomycin (DAP) CL does not scale proportionally with weight, fixed-dose DAP has been proposed to optimize efficacy and mitigate toxicity. This study evaluated systemic exposure of a fixed dose (750 mg) of DAP in patients with Staphylococcus aureus infections. METHODS: Adult non-ICU...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olney, Katie B, Thomas, Jenni, Pai, Manjunath P, Burgess, Donna R, Olney, William, Bruning, Rebecca, Griffith, Kamron Amir, Casaus, Danielle, Crance, Elizabeth, Burgess, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677270/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2171
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: As daptomycin (DAP) CL does not scale proportionally with weight, fixed-dose DAP has been proposed to optimize efficacy and mitigate toxicity. This study evaluated systemic exposure of a fixed dose (750 mg) of DAP in patients with Staphylococcus aureus infections. METHODS: Adult non-ICU patients with CrCl ≥ 30 mL/min admitted to our academic medical center warranting DAP for a S. aureus infection were eligible for enrollment. DAP 750 mg was infused over 30 minutes every 24 hours. At steady state, concentrations were obtained pre-dose (0.5 hours) and 1, 12, and 24 hours after the start of infusion. Concentrations were measured using a validated LC-MS assay. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was performed using first-order equations and stratified by weight: low (< 65 kg), normal (65-85 kg), and high ( > 85 kg). Therapeutic AUC(24) (≥ 666 mg*hr/L) and elevated trough (C(min) > 24.3 mg/L) were the efficacy and safety targets, respectively. RESULTS: Overall, 22 patients (6 low weight, 8 normal weight, 8 high weight) were enrolled with no differences observed in baseline characteristics (median [IQR] age 49 [42.2, 56.5], CrCl 111 mL/min [79, 134]). PK parameters (median [IQR]) did not differ by weight with Vd 9.9 L [6.3, 17.2], K(e) 0.078 h(-1) [0.046, 0.098], CL 0.87 L/h [0.47, 1.34], AUC(24) 861 mg*hr/L [538, 1541], and C(min) 10.5 mg/L [7.3, 29.9]. Therapeutic AUC(24) was achieved in 14/22 (64%) and elevated C(min) occurred in 7/22 (32%), with no differences seen among weight groups. However, differences were noted between males (n=10) and females (n=12) with significantly higher CL (median [IQR]) noted in males (1.26 L/h [0.92, 1.48]) vs. females (0.49 L/h [0.37, 0.86]) (p=0.027). Hence, median [IQR] AUC(24) was significantly lower in males at 594 mg*hr/L [454, 736] vs. 1513 mg*hr/L [856, 1879] in females (p=0.021). Therapeutic AUC(24) was achieved in 40% of males versus 83% of females, while elevated C(min) was seen in 20% of males and 32% of females. CONCLUSION: DAP PK and exposure (AUC(24) and C(min)) was not impacted by weight. These results support fixed, rather than weight-based, dosing of DAP in non-ICU patients with normal renal function. Notably, gender differences were observed with males having significantly higher CL, likely warranting higher doses of DAP to ensure optimal exposure. DISCLOSURES: Katie B. Olney, PharmD, BCIDP, The Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP): Grant/Research Support