Cargando…

139. Clinical Predictors of a Positive MPox PCR: A Framework for Diagnostic Stewardship

BACKGROUND: In July 2022, an outbreak of MPox was reported in the United States as part of a world-wide health emergency. Healthcare settings in the US started to see possible cases, and the public health and clinical diagnostics infrastructure was quickly overwhelmed. As the concept of diagnostic s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gonzales, Adrienne M, Yeh, Rose, Rostane, ikram, Ratliff, Hunter, Wanger, Audrey, Ostrosky-Zeichner, Luis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677283/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.212
_version_ 1785150093194690560
author Gonzales, Adrienne M
Yeh, Rose
Rostane, ikram
Ratliff, Hunter
Wanger, Audrey
Ostrosky-Zeichner, Luis
author_facet Gonzales, Adrienne M
Yeh, Rose
Rostane, ikram
Ratliff, Hunter
Wanger, Audrey
Ostrosky-Zeichner, Luis
author_sort Gonzales, Adrienne M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In July 2022, an outbreak of MPox was reported in the United States as part of a world-wide health emergency. Healthcare settings in the US started to see possible cases, and the public health and clinical diagnostics infrastructure was quickly overwhelmed. As the concept of diagnostic stewardship is becoming increasingly more important, we sought to identify clinical information obtainable at presentation that would predict a positive MPox PCR in order to streamline testing and optimize resource utilization. Table 1 [Figure: see text] RR and diagnostic performance for single and combined clinical factors resulting in a positive MPox PCR METHODS: The charts of 146 patients presenting for MPox testing in a large healthcare system in Texas in July and August 2022 were reviewed to identify clinical factors upon presentation that would correlate with a positive lesion PCR. RESULTS: 49.3% of patients tested positive. The mean (SD) age of patients was 31.9 (8.41) years. The mean (SD) time of symptoms was 5.47 (5.08) days. The mean (SD) time from last sexual encounter was 17.6 (11.01) days. Table 1 shows the RR and diagnostic performance for each clinical factor resulting in a positive MPox PCR as well as the RR for those with 2, 3, and 4 combined high risk clinical factors. CONCLUSION: Male gender, non-heterosexual sexual orientation, recent sexual encounter, painful lesions, contact with a known MPox case, systemic symptoms, and shorter symptom duration less than or equal to 6 days increased the risk of a positive Mpox PCR result and may be used to prioritize testing in a resource constrained environment. Patients presenting with a combination of 2, 3, and 4 risk factors further increased the likelihood of a positive test. Risk factors can be used for diagnostic stewardship in MPox testing. Further research will focus on creation and prospective validation of clinical prediction rules. DISCLOSURES: Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner, MD, FACP, FIDSA, FSHEA, FECMM, CMQ, Astellas: Grant/Research Support|Cidara: Advisor/Consultant|Cidara: Advisor/Consultant|F2G: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Melinta: Advisor/Consultant|NIH: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Honoraria|Pulmocide: Grant/Research Support|Scynexis: Grant/Research Support|T2 Biosystems: Grant/Research Support|Viracor: Advisor/Consultant
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10677283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106772832023-11-27 139. Clinical Predictors of a Positive MPox PCR: A Framework for Diagnostic Stewardship Gonzales, Adrienne M Yeh, Rose Rostane, ikram Ratliff, Hunter Wanger, Audrey Ostrosky-Zeichner, Luis Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: In July 2022, an outbreak of MPox was reported in the United States as part of a world-wide health emergency. Healthcare settings in the US started to see possible cases, and the public health and clinical diagnostics infrastructure was quickly overwhelmed. As the concept of diagnostic stewardship is becoming increasingly more important, we sought to identify clinical information obtainable at presentation that would predict a positive MPox PCR in order to streamline testing and optimize resource utilization. Table 1 [Figure: see text] RR and diagnostic performance for single and combined clinical factors resulting in a positive MPox PCR METHODS: The charts of 146 patients presenting for MPox testing in a large healthcare system in Texas in July and August 2022 were reviewed to identify clinical factors upon presentation that would correlate with a positive lesion PCR. RESULTS: 49.3% of patients tested positive. The mean (SD) age of patients was 31.9 (8.41) years. The mean (SD) time of symptoms was 5.47 (5.08) days. The mean (SD) time from last sexual encounter was 17.6 (11.01) days. Table 1 shows the RR and diagnostic performance for each clinical factor resulting in a positive MPox PCR as well as the RR for those with 2, 3, and 4 combined high risk clinical factors. CONCLUSION: Male gender, non-heterosexual sexual orientation, recent sexual encounter, painful lesions, contact with a known MPox case, systemic symptoms, and shorter symptom duration less than or equal to 6 days increased the risk of a positive Mpox PCR result and may be used to prioritize testing in a resource constrained environment. Patients presenting with a combination of 2, 3, and 4 risk factors further increased the likelihood of a positive test. Risk factors can be used for diagnostic stewardship in MPox testing. Further research will focus on creation and prospective validation of clinical prediction rules. DISCLOSURES: Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner, MD, FACP, FIDSA, FSHEA, FECMM, CMQ, Astellas: Grant/Research Support|Cidara: Advisor/Consultant|Cidara: Advisor/Consultant|F2G: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Melinta: Advisor/Consultant|NIH: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Honoraria|Pulmocide: Grant/Research Support|Scynexis: Grant/Research Support|T2 Biosystems: Grant/Research Support|Viracor: Advisor/Consultant Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10677283/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.212 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Gonzales, Adrienne M
Yeh, Rose
Rostane, ikram
Ratliff, Hunter
Wanger, Audrey
Ostrosky-Zeichner, Luis
139. Clinical Predictors of a Positive MPox PCR: A Framework for Diagnostic Stewardship
title 139. Clinical Predictors of a Positive MPox PCR: A Framework for Diagnostic Stewardship
title_full 139. Clinical Predictors of a Positive MPox PCR: A Framework for Diagnostic Stewardship
title_fullStr 139. Clinical Predictors of a Positive MPox PCR: A Framework for Diagnostic Stewardship
title_full_unstemmed 139. Clinical Predictors of a Positive MPox PCR: A Framework for Diagnostic Stewardship
title_short 139. Clinical Predictors of a Positive MPox PCR: A Framework for Diagnostic Stewardship
title_sort 139. clinical predictors of a positive mpox pcr: a framework for diagnostic stewardship
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677283/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.212
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalesadriennem 139clinicalpredictorsofapositivempoxpcraframeworkfordiagnosticstewardship
AT yehrose 139clinicalpredictorsofapositivempoxpcraframeworkfordiagnosticstewardship
AT rostaneikram 139clinicalpredictorsofapositivempoxpcraframeworkfordiagnosticstewardship
AT ratliffhunter 139clinicalpredictorsofapositivempoxpcraframeworkfordiagnosticstewardship
AT wangeraudrey 139clinicalpredictorsofapositivempoxpcraframeworkfordiagnosticstewardship
AT ostroskyzeichnerluis 139clinicalpredictorsofapositivempoxpcraframeworkfordiagnosticstewardship