Cargando…

986. Clinical Utility of 16S rRNA Sequencing and Impact on Outcomes in Adults with Suspected Infection

BACKGROUND: Targeted antimicrobial regimens rely on prompt isolation and identification of the pathogen. When conventional gold standard culture-based methods fail to identify a pathogen, broad range PCR and next-generation 16S rRNA sequencing has emerged as a clinically useful and increasingly freq...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weinert-Stein, Kaitlyn, Hojat, Leila S, Sarah Cherian, Sree, Paul Lim, Peter, Desai, Ankita P, Cater, Mackenzie, Khazan, Ana, Azem, Reem, Moore, LeAnne, Stempak, Lisa M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677289/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.041
_version_ 1785150094608171008
author Weinert-Stein, Kaitlyn
Hojat, Leila S
Sarah Cherian, Sree
Paul Lim, Peter
Desai, Ankita P
Cater, Mackenzie
Khazan, Ana
Azem, Reem
Moore, LeAnne
Stempak, Lisa M
author_facet Weinert-Stein, Kaitlyn
Hojat, Leila S
Sarah Cherian, Sree
Paul Lim, Peter
Desai, Ankita P
Cater, Mackenzie
Khazan, Ana
Azem, Reem
Moore, LeAnne
Stempak, Lisa M
author_sort Weinert-Stein, Kaitlyn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Targeted antimicrobial regimens rely on prompt isolation and identification of the pathogen. When conventional gold standard culture-based methods fail to identify a pathogen, broad range PCR and next-generation 16S rRNA sequencing has emerged as a clinically useful and increasingly frequent diagnostic tool. However, its impact in clinical decision making and effect on outcomes, particularly with negative results, remains poorly elucidated. This study aims to evaluate the clinical impact of 16S rRNA in adult infections. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on clinical specimens analyzed by 16S rRNA from August 2016 to December 2021 in our institution. Electronic medical records were reviewed to determine if 16S rRNA results had clinical utility, defined as prompting a change or stop of therapy or confirming the prescribed antimicrobial regimen. Antimicrobial-related events, readmission and infection-related mortality at 90 days were the outcomes of interest and were compared between groups using the Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-nine samples were included in the analysis. Clinical utility was identified in 108 (30.1%) specimens including 45 (41.7%) with negative 16S rRNA results (Figure 1). The most common pathogens identified were skin flora (19.4%) and Streptococci spp. (13.9%). Body fluid specimens yielded the most clinical utility (62.5%) followed by cranial samples (60%) and valve/endovascular graft samples (52%) (Figure 2). Readmissions were significantly lower in the clinical utility group compared to the no clinical utility group (10.5% vs 19.8%, p=0.04, 95% confidence interval 0.21-0.99) (Table 1). Mortality and adverse events were not statistically different between the two groups. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Both positive and negative 16S rRNA results have clinical utility in our study with body fluid specimens having the highest clinical utility. Readmissions were statistically lower in cases with clinical utility, while adverse events and mortality were numerically lower but not statistically significant. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the impact of negative 16S rRNA results in adult infections, and further studies are needed to determine the most effective application for patient care. DISCLOSURES: Lisa M, Stempak, MD, Cytovale Inc: Advisor/Consultant
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10677289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106772892023-11-27 986. Clinical Utility of 16S rRNA Sequencing and Impact on Outcomes in Adults with Suspected Infection Weinert-Stein, Kaitlyn Hojat, Leila S Sarah Cherian, Sree Paul Lim, Peter Desai, Ankita P Cater, Mackenzie Khazan, Ana Azem, Reem Moore, LeAnne Stempak, Lisa M Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Targeted antimicrobial regimens rely on prompt isolation and identification of the pathogen. When conventional gold standard culture-based methods fail to identify a pathogen, broad range PCR and next-generation 16S rRNA sequencing has emerged as a clinically useful and increasingly frequent diagnostic tool. However, its impact in clinical decision making and effect on outcomes, particularly with negative results, remains poorly elucidated. This study aims to evaluate the clinical impact of 16S rRNA in adult infections. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on clinical specimens analyzed by 16S rRNA from August 2016 to December 2021 in our institution. Electronic medical records were reviewed to determine if 16S rRNA results had clinical utility, defined as prompting a change or stop of therapy or confirming the prescribed antimicrobial regimen. Antimicrobial-related events, readmission and infection-related mortality at 90 days were the outcomes of interest and were compared between groups using the Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-nine samples were included in the analysis. Clinical utility was identified in 108 (30.1%) specimens including 45 (41.7%) with negative 16S rRNA results (Figure 1). The most common pathogens identified were skin flora (19.4%) and Streptococci spp. (13.9%). Body fluid specimens yielded the most clinical utility (62.5%) followed by cranial samples (60%) and valve/endovascular graft samples (52%) (Figure 2). Readmissions were significantly lower in the clinical utility group compared to the no clinical utility group (10.5% vs 19.8%, p=0.04, 95% confidence interval 0.21-0.99) (Table 1). Mortality and adverse events were not statistically different between the two groups. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Both positive and negative 16S rRNA results have clinical utility in our study with body fluid specimens having the highest clinical utility. Readmissions were statistically lower in cases with clinical utility, while adverse events and mortality were numerically lower but not statistically significant. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the impact of negative 16S rRNA results in adult infections, and further studies are needed to determine the most effective application for patient care. DISCLOSURES: Lisa M, Stempak, MD, Cytovale Inc: Advisor/Consultant Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10677289/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.041 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Weinert-Stein, Kaitlyn
Hojat, Leila S
Sarah Cherian, Sree
Paul Lim, Peter
Desai, Ankita P
Cater, Mackenzie
Khazan, Ana
Azem, Reem
Moore, LeAnne
Stempak, Lisa M
986. Clinical Utility of 16S rRNA Sequencing and Impact on Outcomes in Adults with Suspected Infection
title 986. Clinical Utility of 16S rRNA Sequencing and Impact on Outcomes in Adults with Suspected Infection
title_full 986. Clinical Utility of 16S rRNA Sequencing and Impact on Outcomes in Adults with Suspected Infection
title_fullStr 986. Clinical Utility of 16S rRNA Sequencing and Impact on Outcomes in Adults with Suspected Infection
title_full_unstemmed 986. Clinical Utility of 16S rRNA Sequencing and Impact on Outcomes in Adults with Suspected Infection
title_short 986. Clinical Utility of 16S rRNA Sequencing and Impact on Outcomes in Adults with Suspected Infection
title_sort 986. clinical utility of 16s rrna sequencing and impact on outcomes in adults with suspected infection
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677289/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.041
work_keys_str_mv AT weinertsteinkaitlyn 986clinicalutilityof16srrnasequencingandimpactonoutcomesinadultswithsuspectedinfection
AT hojatleilas 986clinicalutilityof16srrnasequencingandimpactonoutcomesinadultswithsuspectedinfection
AT sarahcheriansree 986clinicalutilityof16srrnasequencingandimpactonoutcomesinadultswithsuspectedinfection
AT paullimpeter 986clinicalutilityof16srrnasequencingandimpactonoutcomesinadultswithsuspectedinfection
AT desaiankitap 986clinicalutilityof16srrnasequencingandimpactonoutcomesinadultswithsuspectedinfection
AT catermackenzie 986clinicalutilityof16srrnasequencingandimpactonoutcomesinadultswithsuspectedinfection
AT khazanana 986clinicalutilityof16srrnasequencingandimpactonoutcomesinadultswithsuspectedinfection
AT azemreem 986clinicalutilityof16srrnasequencingandimpactonoutcomesinadultswithsuspectedinfection
AT mooreleanne 986clinicalutilityof16srrnasequencingandimpactonoutcomesinadultswithsuspectedinfection
AT stempaklisam 986clinicalutilityof16srrnasequencingandimpactonoutcomesinadultswithsuspectedinfection