Cargando…
649. Expansion Of A Low-Cost, Open-Source, Saliva-Based PCR Test For The Detection Of Mpox Virus
BACKGROUND: Clinical diagnosis of mpox (monkeypox) virus relies on lesion swabs. Many patients experience prodromal symptoms prior to lesion-onset. Earlier detection could bolster outbreak response by mitigating transmission and facilitating access to antiviral treatments. With a growing number of s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677374/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.712 |
_version_ | 1785150114586689536 |
---|---|
author | Thomas, Russell Yolda-Carr, Devyn Steel, Sydney A Tobik, Emily R Zepeda, Theresa Brownlee, Maurice Saladi, Shyam Parkin, James Fajardo, Katherine Allicock, Orchid M Wyllie, Anne L |
author_facet | Thomas, Russell Yolda-Carr, Devyn Steel, Sydney A Tobik, Emily R Zepeda, Theresa Brownlee, Maurice Saladi, Shyam Parkin, James Fajardo, Katherine Allicock, Orchid M Wyllie, Anne L |
author_sort | Thomas, Russell |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical diagnosis of mpox (monkeypox) virus relies on lesion swabs. Many patients experience prodromal symptoms prior to lesion-onset. Earlier detection could bolster outbreak response by mitigating transmission and facilitating access to antiviral treatments. With a growing number of studies reporting mpox detection in saliva, we adapted our saliva-based, extraction-free PCR test developed for SARS-CoV-2, for the detection of mpox virus. METHODS: We first compared five PCR assays for their detection of mpox DNA extracted from 30 saliva specimens collected into Spectrum SDNA-1000 tubes. Next, we investigated the stability of mpox detection in five raw, unsupplemented saliva samples diluted 1:5 in mpox-negative saliva, after storage at 4°C, ∼19°C (room temp.), 30°C, and 40°C for 72 hours. We also examined the stability of virus detection in three samples as per the FDA guidance for shipping of samples for testing. Additionally, we performed amplicon sequencing on 10 saliva samples and assessed concordance of the PCR assays against mpox virus sequences. RESULTS: The Logix Smart™ Mpox (2-Gene) RUO (Co-Diagnostics, Inc.) performed better at detection. Despite identifying three different substitutions in the CDC’s Monkeypox Virus Generic Real-Time PCR Test’s primers, results from ANOVA did not suggest a mean difference in cycle threshold values between assays. Detection following storage at 4°C, ∼19°C, and 30°C remained relatively stable for 24-48 hours but this declined by 72 hours. At 40°C, detection was stable at 24 hours but declined by 48 hours. Detection following simulated summer and winter shipping temperature profiles also remained stable. CONCLUSION: Findings of this pilot investigation support a flexible, extraction-free, saliva-based PCR test as a promising approach for the low-cost detection of mpox virus. With stability observed for 24-48 hours as well as over simulated shipping temperatures, saliva-based sampling and simplified testing could reduce mpox diagnostic costs, increase access to testing and address hurdles in low- and middle-income countries. Future studies should assess the temporal dynamics of mpox virus in saliva. DISCLOSURES: Shyam Saladi, n/a, Neelyx Labs: Ownership Interest|SalivaDirect Inc: Board Member James Parkin, PhD, Neelyx Labs: employee Anne L. Wyllie, PhD, Co-Diagnostics: Board Member|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10677374 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106773742023-11-27 649. Expansion Of A Low-Cost, Open-Source, Saliva-Based PCR Test For The Detection Of Mpox Virus Thomas, Russell Yolda-Carr, Devyn Steel, Sydney A Tobik, Emily R Zepeda, Theresa Brownlee, Maurice Saladi, Shyam Parkin, James Fajardo, Katherine Allicock, Orchid M Wyllie, Anne L Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Clinical diagnosis of mpox (monkeypox) virus relies on lesion swabs. Many patients experience prodromal symptoms prior to lesion-onset. Earlier detection could bolster outbreak response by mitigating transmission and facilitating access to antiviral treatments. With a growing number of studies reporting mpox detection in saliva, we adapted our saliva-based, extraction-free PCR test developed for SARS-CoV-2, for the detection of mpox virus. METHODS: We first compared five PCR assays for their detection of mpox DNA extracted from 30 saliva specimens collected into Spectrum SDNA-1000 tubes. Next, we investigated the stability of mpox detection in five raw, unsupplemented saliva samples diluted 1:5 in mpox-negative saliva, after storage at 4°C, ∼19°C (room temp.), 30°C, and 40°C for 72 hours. We also examined the stability of virus detection in three samples as per the FDA guidance for shipping of samples for testing. Additionally, we performed amplicon sequencing on 10 saliva samples and assessed concordance of the PCR assays against mpox virus sequences. RESULTS: The Logix Smart™ Mpox (2-Gene) RUO (Co-Diagnostics, Inc.) performed better at detection. Despite identifying three different substitutions in the CDC’s Monkeypox Virus Generic Real-Time PCR Test’s primers, results from ANOVA did not suggest a mean difference in cycle threshold values between assays. Detection following storage at 4°C, ∼19°C, and 30°C remained relatively stable for 24-48 hours but this declined by 72 hours. At 40°C, detection was stable at 24 hours but declined by 48 hours. Detection following simulated summer and winter shipping temperature profiles also remained stable. CONCLUSION: Findings of this pilot investigation support a flexible, extraction-free, saliva-based PCR test as a promising approach for the low-cost detection of mpox virus. With stability observed for 24-48 hours as well as over simulated shipping temperatures, saliva-based sampling and simplified testing could reduce mpox diagnostic costs, increase access to testing and address hurdles in low- and middle-income countries. Future studies should assess the temporal dynamics of mpox virus in saliva. DISCLOSURES: Shyam Saladi, n/a, Neelyx Labs: Ownership Interest|SalivaDirect Inc: Board Member James Parkin, PhD, Neelyx Labs: employee Anne L. Wyllie, PhD, Co-Diagnostics: Board Member|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10677374/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.712 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstract Thomas, Russell Yolda-Carr, Devyn Steel, Sydney A Tobik, Emily R Zepeda, Theresa Brownlee, Maurice Saladi, Shyam Parkin, James Fajardo, Katherine Allicock, Orchid M Wyllie, Anne L 649. Expansion Of A Low-Cost, Open-Source, Saliva-Based PCR Test For The Detection Of Mpox Virus |
title | 649. Expansion Of A Low-Cost, Open-Source, Saliva-Based PCR Test For The Detection Of Mpox Virus |
title_full | 649. Expansion Of A Low-Cost, Open-Source, Saliva-Based PCR Test For The Detection Of Mpox Virus |
title_fullStr | 649. Expansion Of A Low-Cost, Open-Source, Saliva-Based PCR Test For The Detection Of Mpox Virus |
title_full_unstemmed | 649. Expansion Of A Low-Cost, Open-Source, Saliva-Based PCR Test For The Detection Of Mpox Virus |
title_short | 649. Expansion Of A Low-Cost, Open-Source, Saliva-Based PCR Test For The Detection Of Mpox Virus |
title_sort | 649. expansion of a low-cost, open-source, saliva-based pcr test for the detection of mpox virus |
topic | Abstract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677374/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.712 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thomasrussell 649expansionofalowcostopensourcesalivabasedpcrtestforthedetectionofmpoxvirus AT yoldacarrdevyn 649expansionofalowcostopensourcesalivabasedpcrtestforthedetectionofmpoxvirus AT steelsydneya 649expansionofalowcostopensourcesalivabasedpcrtestforthedetectionofmpoxvirus AT tobikemilyr 649expansionofalowcostopensourcesalivabasedpcrtestforthedetectionofmpoxvirus AT zepedatheresa 649expansionofalowcostopensourcesalivabasedpcrtestforthedetectionofmpoxvirus AT brownleemaurice 649expansionofalowcostopensourcesalivabasedpcrtestforthedetectionofmpoxvirus AT saladishyam 649expansionofalowcostopensourcesalivabasedpcrtestforthedetectionofmpoxvirus AT parkinjames 649expansionofalowcostopensourcesalivabasedpcrtestforthedetectionofmpoxvirus AT fajardokatherine 649expansionofalowcostopensourcesalivabasedpcrtestforthedetectionofmpoxvirus AT allicockorchidm 649expansionofalowcostopensourcesalivabasedpcrtestforthedetectionofmpoxvirus AT wyllieannel 649expansionofalowcostopensourcesalivabasedpcrtestforthedetectionofmpoxvirus |