Cargando…
2143. in-vitro activity of Bacteriophages against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms
BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) biofilms can be resilient to the human immune system and antibiotics, a challenge augmented by acquired antimicrobial resistance. Phage therapy is being evaluated for biofilm-associated infections. METHODS: Here, model phages SaMD07ø1 an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677375/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1766 |
_version_ | 1785150114949496832 |
---|---|
author | Parmar, Krupa Chaudhry, Waqas Fackler, Joseph Sowers, John M Vadlamudi, Aravinda Greenwood-Quaintance, Kerryl E Patel, Robin |
author_facet | Parmar, Krupa Chaudhry, Waqas Fackler, Joseph Sowers, John M Vadlamudi, Aravinda Greenwood-Quaintance, Kerryl E Patel, Robin |
author_sort | Parmar, Krupa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) biofilms can be resilient to the human immune system and antibiotics, a challenge augmented by acquired antimicrobial resistance. Phage therapy is being evaluated for biofilm-associated infections. METHODS: Here, model phages SaMD07ø1 and SaRB105030ø5 were evaluated against their hosts SaMD07 and SaRB105030, respectively, grown as biofilms in 96-well plates, as biofilms on glass beads and planktonically. Trypticase soy broth (TSB) and phosphate buffered saline (PBS) were evaluated as testing media (Figure 1). Biofilms were incubated with phages in the presence of media containing tetrazolium dye in 96-well plates and assessed for hold times (delays in reaching bacterial log-phase metabolic activity compared to controls) over 48 hours (h) using a Biolog Omnilog® system and by assessing colony forming units (CFUs). Subsequently, using the beads biofilm assay in TSB medium performed on the Omnilog® (BBTO) (Figure 2), test phage SaMD22ø1 was evaluated in quintuplicate against biofilms formed by MRSA isolates IDRL-6130, IDRL-6927, IDRL-6987, IDRL-7381, IDRL-7542 and IDRL-10947, all recovered from periprosthetic joint infection. Test phage K was evaluated against GFP-labelled MRSA AH1263 using BBTO method and simultaneously by fluorescence microscopy. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] RESULTS: A comparison of result of testing of biofilms in wells and on beads and against planktonic bacteria is shown in Figure 3. Phage SaMD07ø1 showed no growth at 4 h; whereas phage SaRB105030ø5 showed ∼1-log decrease in CFUs at 4 h and ∼3-log decrease in CFUs at 8 h (Figure 3). BBTO hold-times of 37, 28 and 15 h were observed for phages SaMD07ø1, SaRB105030ø5 and phage K respectively. Phage SaMD22ø1 had an average hold time of 9 h and showed hold times >6 hours for all isolates tested (Figure 4). Microscopic inspection showed eradication of GFP-labelled MRSA biofilm by phage K (Figure 5). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] The solid blue line indicates a hold time of 8 hours. [Figure: see text] The authors are thankful to Dr. Alexander Horswill at University of Colorado for providing the GFP-labelled MRSA strain. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, BBTO is a promising method for testing biofilm phage susceptibility although clinical correlation and testing of larger numbers of phage and bacterial isolates are needed. DISCLOSURES: Joseph Fackler, n/a, Adaptive Phage Therapeutics, Inc: Employee|Adaptive Phage Therapeutics, Inc: Stocks/Bonds John M. Sowers, n/a, Adaptive Phage Therapeutics: Employee|Adaptive Phage Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Robin Patel, MD, Abbott Laboratories: Advisor/Consultant|Adaptive Phage Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Adaptive Phage Therapeutics: Mayo Clinic has a royalty-bearing know-how agreement and equity in Adaptive Phage Therapeutics.|BIOFIRE: Grant/Research Support|CARB-X: Advisor/Consultant|ContraFect: Grant/Research Support|Day Zero Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant|HealthTrackRx: Advisor/Consultant|Mammoth Biosciences: Advisor/Consultant|Netflix: Advisor/Consultant|Oxford Nanopore Technologies: Advisor/Consultant|PhAST: Advisor/Consultant|See details: Patent on Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis PCR issued, a patent on a device/method for sonication with royalties paid by Samsung to Mayo Clinic|See details: continued, patent on an anti-biofilm substance issued|TenNor Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Torus Biosystems: Advisor/Consultant|Trellis Bioscience, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10677375 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106773752023-11-27 2143. in-vitro activity of Bacteriophages against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms Parmar, Krupa Chaudhry, Waqas Fackler, Joseph Sowers, John M Vadlamudi, Aravinda Greenwood-Quaintance, Kerryl E Patel, Robin Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) biofilms can be resilient to the human immune system and antibiotics, a challenge augmented by acquired antimicrobial resistance. Phage therapy is being evaluated for biofilm-associated infections. METHODS: Here, model phages SaMD07ø1 and SaRB105030ø5 were evaluated against their hosts SaMD07 and SaRB105030, respectively, grown as biofilms in 96-well plates, as biofilms on glass beads and planktonically. Trypticase soy broth (TSB) and phosphate buffered saline (PBS) were evaluated as testing media (Figure 1). Biofilms were incubated with phages in the presence of media containing tetrazolium dye in 96-well plates and assessed for hold times (delays in reaching bacterial log-phase metabolic activity compared to controls) over 48 hours (h) using a Biolog Omnilog® system and by assessing colony forming units (CFUs). Subsequently, using the beads biofilm assay in TSB medium performed on the Omnilog® (BBTO) (Figure 2), test phage SaMD22ø1 was evaluated in quintuplicate against biofilms formed by MRSA isolates IDRL-6130, IDRL-6927, IDRL-6987, IDRL-7381, IDRL-7542 and IDRL-10947, all recovered from periprosthetic joint infection. Test phage K was evaluated against GFP-labelled MRSA AH1263 using BBTO method and simultaneously by fluorescence microscopy. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] RESULTS: A comparison of result of testing of biofilms in wells and on beads and against planktonic bacteria is shown in Figure 3. Phage SaMD07ø1 showed no growth at 4 h; whereas phage SaRB105030ø5 showed ∼1-log decrease in CFUs at 4 h and ∼3-log decrease in CFUs at 8 h (Figure 3). BBTO hold-times of 37, 28 and 15 h were observed for phages SaMD07ø1, SaRB105030ø5 and phage K respectively. Phage SaMD22ø1 had an average hold time of 9 h and showed hold times >6 hours for all isolates tested (Figure 4). Microscopic inspection showed eradication of GFP-labelled MRSA biofilm by phage K (Figure 5). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] The solid blue line indicates a hold time of 8 hours. [Figure: see text] The authors are thankful to Dr. Alexander Horswill at University of Colorado for providing the GFP-labelled MRSA strain. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, BBTO is a promising method for testing biofilm phage susceptibility although clinical correlation and testing of larger numbers of phage and bacterial isolates are needed. DISCLOSURES: Joseph Fackler, n/a, Adaptive Phage Therapeutics, Inc: Employee|Adaptive Phage Therapeutics, Inc: Stocks/Bonds John M. Sowers, n/a, Adaptive Phage Therapeutics: Employee|Adaptive Phage Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Robin Patel, MD, Abbott Laboratories: Advisor/Consultant|Adaptive Phage Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Adaptive Phage Therapeutics: Mayo Clinic has a royalty-bearing know-how agreement and equity in Adaptive Phage Therapeutics.|BIOFIRE: Grant/Research Support|CARB-X: Advisor/Consultant|ContraFect: Grant/Research Support|Day Zero Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant|HealthTrackRx: Advisor/Consultant|Mammoth Biosciences: Advisor/Consultant|Netflix: Advisor/Consultant|Oxford Nanopore Technologies: Advisor/Consultant|PhAST: Advisor/Consultant|See details: Patent on Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis PCR issued, a patent on a device/method for sonication with royalties paid by Samsung to Mayo Clinic|See details: continued, patent on an anti-biofilm substance issued|TenNor Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Torus Biosystems: Advisor/Consultant|Trellis Bioscience, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10677375/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1766 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstract Parmar, Krupa Chaudhry, Waqas Fackler, Joseph Sowers, John M Vadlamudi, Aravinda Greenwood-Quaintance, Kerryl E Patel, Robin 2143. in-vitro activity of Bacteriophages against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms |
title | 2143. in-vitro activity of Bacteriophages against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms |
title_full | 2143. in-vitro activity of Bacteriophages against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms |
title_fullStr | 2143. in-vitro activity of Bacteriophages against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms |
title_full_unstemmed | 2143. in-vitro activity of Bacteriophages against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms |
title_short | 2143. in-vitro activity of Bacteriophages against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms |
title_sort | 2143. in-vitro activity of bacteriophages against methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus biofilms |
topic | Abstract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677375/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1766 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parmarkrupa 2143invitroactivityofbacteriophagesagainstmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbiofilms AT chaudhrywaqas 2143invitroactivityofbacteriophagesagainstmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbiofilms AT facklerjoseph 2143invitroactivityofbacteriophagesagainstmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbiofilms AT sowersjohnm 2143invitroactivityofbacteriophagesagainstmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbiofilms AT vadlamudiaravinda 2143invitroactivityofbacteriophagesagainstmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbiofilms AT greenwoodquaintancekerryle 2143invitroactivityofbacteriophagesagainstmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbiofilms AT patelrobin 2143invitroactivityofbacteriophagesagainstmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbiofilms |