Cargando…
212. Effectiveness of Empirical Piperacillin/tazobactam Compared to Cefepime for Bloodstream Infection Caused by Gram-Negative Bacilli
BACKGROUND: Piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ) and cefepime (CFP) are commonly used antibiotics for healthcare-associated infections and immunocompromised patients. However, few studies have compared the clinical effectiveness of these two antibiotics. Thus, we compared the effectiveness of empirical PTZ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677407/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.285 |
_version_ | 1785150122811719680 |
---|---|
author | Ho Lee, Young Yang, Jinyoung Ko, Jae-Hoon Young Cho, Sun Huh, Heejae Yong Lee, Nam Kang, Cheol-In Ryeon Chung, Doo Ran Peck, Kyong Song, Jae-Hoon Huh, Kyungmin |
author_facet | Ho Lee, Young Yang, Jinyoung Ko, Jae-Hoon Young Cho, Sun Huh, Heejae Yong Lee, Nam Kang, Cheol-In Ryeon Chung, Doo Ran Peck, Kyong Song, Jae-Hoon Huh, Kyungmin |
author_sort | Ho Lee, Young |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ) and cefepime (CFP) are commonly used antibiotics for healthcare-associated infections and immunocompromised patients. However, few studies have compared the clinical effectiveness of these two antibiotics. Thus, we compared the effectiveness of empirical PTZ and CFP in patients with monomicrobial blood-stream infection (BSI) caused by gram-negative bacilli. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive, non-duplicate monomicrobial BSIs caused by 1 of 4 taxa (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species) identified from a nationwide, prospective surveillance (Korean Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network [KARS-Net]). Patients who were treated with PTZ or CFP as the only active empirical antibiotic were included. The primary outcome was all-cause, in-hospital 30-day mortality. Logistic regression with backward selection was used to adjust for imbalance in baseline characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 120 cases were included, among which 87 (72.5%) were treated with PTZ and 33 (27.5%) with CFP. Underlying renal disease was more common in the PTZ group whereas malignancy, septic shock, and neutropenia were more common in the CFP group. (Table 1). All-cause 30-day in-hospital mortality was comparable between the two groups (16.1% vs 12.1%, p=0.777; table 2), as well as attributable mortality. However, the early clinical response at 72 hr was significantly more common in the patients treated with CFP (25.3% vs 57.6%, p=0.001) The choice of empirical antibiotics was not significantly associated with mortality in a multivariable logistic regression model (Table 3). Older age (≥65 years; adjusted OR. 16.24; 95% CI, 2.21-119.60), lower ECOG (aOR, 2.91 per 1 point, 95% CI, 1.35-6.25), high PITT score (aOR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.17-6.25) and chronic liver disease (aOR, 39.70; 95% CI, 2.56-615.13) were significant independent risk factors for 30-day in-hospital mortality. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: In patients with BSI caused by gram-negative bacilli, empirical use of either PTZ or CFP was associated with comparable clinical outcomes. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10677407 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106774072023-11-27 212. Effectiveness of Empirical Piperacillin/tazobactam Compared to Cefepime for Bloodstream Infection Caused by Gram-Negative Bacilli Ho Lee, Young Yang, Jinyoung Ko, Jae-Hoon Young Cho, Sun Huh, Heejae Yong Lee, Nam Kang, Cheol-In Ryeon Chung, Doo Ran Peck, Kyong Song, Jae-Hoon Huh, Kyungmin Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ) and cefepime (CFP) are commonly used antibiotics for healthcare-associated infections and immunocompromised patients. However, few studies have compared the clinical effectiveness of these two antibiotics. Thus, we compared the effectiveness of empirical PTZ and CFP in patients with monomicrobial blood-stream infection (BSI) caused by gram-negative bacilli. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive, non-duplicate monomicrobial BSIs caused by 1 of 4 taxa (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species) identified from a nationwide, prospective surveillance (Korean Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network [KARS-Net]). Patients who were treated with PTZ or CFP as the only active empirical antibiotic were included. The primary outcome was all-cause, in-hospital 30-day mortality. Logistic regression with backward selection was used to adjust for imbalance in baseline characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 120 cases were included, among which 87 (72.5%) were treated with PTZ and 33 (27.5%) with CFP. Underlying renal disease was more common in the PTZ group whereas malignancy, septic shock, and neutropenia were more common in the CFP group. (Table 1). All-cause 30-day in-hospital mortality was comparable between the two groups (16.1% vs 12.1%, p=0.777; table 2), as well as attributable mortality. However, the early clinical response at 72 hr was significantly more common in the patients treated with CFP (25.3% vs 57.6%, p=0.001) The choice of empirical antibiotics was not significantly associated with mortality in a multivariable logistic regression model (Table 3). Older age (≥65 years; adjusted OR. 16.24; 95% CI, 2.21-119.60), lower ECOG (aOR, 2.91 per 1 point, 95% CI, 1.35-6.25), high PITT score (aOR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.17-6.25) and chronic liver disease (aOR, 39.70; 95% CI, 2.56-615.13) were significant independent risk factors for 30-day in-hospital mortality. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: In patients with BSI caused by gram-negative bacilli, empirical use of either PTZ or CFP was associated with comparable clinical outcomes. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10677407/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.285 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstract Ho Lee, Young Yang, Jinyoung Ko, Jae-Hoon Young Cho, Sun Huh, Heejae Yong Lee, Nam Kang, Cheol-In Ryeon Chung, Doo Ran Peck, Kyong Song, Jae-Hoon Huh, Kyungmin 212. Effectiveness of Empirical Piperacillin/tazobactam Compared to Cefepime for Bloodstream Infection Caused by Gram-Negative Bacilli |
title | 212. Effectiveness of Empirical Piperacillin/tazobactam Compared to Cefepime for Bloodstream Infection Caused by Gram-Negative Bacilli |
title_full | 212. Effectiveness of Empirical Piperacillin/tazobactam Compared to Cefepime for Bloodstream Infection Caused by Gram-Negative Bacilli |
title_fullStr | 212. Effectiveness of Empirical Piperacillin/tazobactam Compared to Cefepime for Bloodstream Infection Caused by Gram-Negative Bacilli |
title_full_unstemmed | 212. Effectiveness of Empirical Piperacillin/tazobactam Compared to Cefepime for Bloodstream Infection Caused by Gram-Negative Bacilli |
title_short | 212. Effectiveness of Empirical Piperacillin/tazobactam Compared to Cefepime for Bloodstream Infection Caused by Gram-Negative Bacilli |
title_sort | 212. effectiveness of empirical piperacillin/tazobactam compared to cefepime for bloodstream infection caused by gram-negative bacilli |
topic | Abstract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677407/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.285 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT holeeyoung 212effectivenessofempiricalpiperacillintazobactamcomparedtocefepimeforbloodstreaminfectioncausedbygramnegativebacilli AT yangjinyoung 212effectivenessofempiricalpiperacillintazobactamcomparedtocefepimeforbloodstreaminfectioncausedbygramnegativebacilli AT kojaehoon 212effectivenessofempiricalpiperacillintazobactamcomparedtocefepimeforbloodstreaminfectioncausedbygramnegativebacilli AT youngchosun 212effectivenessofempiricalpiperacillintazobactamcomparedtocefepimeforbloodstreaminfectioncausedbygramnegativebacilli AT huhheejae 212effectivenessofempiricalpiperacillintazobactamcomparedtocefepimeforbloodstreaminfectioncausedbygramnegativebacilli AT yongleenam 212effectivenessofempiricalpiperacillintazobactamcomparedtocefepimeforbloodstreaminfectioncausedbygramnegativebacilli AT kangcheolin 212effectivenessofempiricalpiperacillintazobactamcomparedtocefepimeforbloodstreaminfectioncausedbygramnegativebacilli AT ryeonchungdoo 212effectivenessofempiricalpiperacillintazobactamcomparedtocefepimeforbloodstreaminfectioncausedbygramnegativebacilli AT ranpeckkyong 212effectivenessofempiricalpiperacillintazobactamcomparedtocefepimeforbloodstreaminfectioncausedbygramnegativebacilli AT songjaehoon 212effectivenessofempiricalpiperacillintazobactamcomparedtocefepimeforbloodstreaminfectioncausedbygramnegativebacilli AT huhkyungmin 212effectivenessofempiricalpiperacillintazobactamcomparedtocefepimeforbloodstreaminfectioncausedbygramnegativebacilli |