Cargando…

1463. Risk Factors for Primary Invasive Surgical Site Infections among Single Adult Liver Transplants at Duke University Hospital in the Period 2015-2019.

BACKGROUND: Invasive primary surgical site infections (IP-SSI) are a severe complication of liver transplant. Identification of risks for IP-SSI is critical to IP-SSI prevention. [Figure: see text] METHODS: All adult single liver transplants performed at Duke University Hospital in 2015-2019 were re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carugati, Manuela, Arif, Sana, King, Lindsay Y, Harris, Matt, Evans, Kayla B, Barbas, Andrew, Sudan, Debra, Miller, Rachel, Alexander, Barbara D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677441/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1300
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Invasive primary surgical site infections (IP-SSI) are a severe complication of liver transplant. Identification of risks for IP-SSI is critical to IP-SSI prevention. [Figure: see text] METHODS: All adult single liver transplants performed at Duke University Hospital in 2015-2019 were reviewed for IP-SSI occurring within 3 months of transplant. Antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens are noted in Table 1. Risks for IP-SSI were identified via backward stepwise multiple logistic regression using an entry cut-off of 0.01. Repeat transplantation, split liver, transplant surgery >8 hrs, Roux-en-Y biliary anastomosis, anastomotic leak, and repeat abdominal surgery within 3 months were entered into the initial model. Prior hepato-biliary surgery, pre-transplant immunosuppressive therapy, and living donor status were excluded due to potential collinearity with “repeat transplantation” and “split liver”. A two-sided p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. [Figure: see text] RESULTS: Among 380 single adult liver transplants performed, 25 (6.6%) IP-SSI were identified. IP-SSI were associated with longer hospital stay (25.0 vs. 9.0 days, p < 0.01). Among IP-SSI, 13 (52.0%) were polymicrobial and 12 (48.0%) monomicrobial. IP-SSI microbiology is detailed in Table 2. Fluconazole resistance occurred in 5 (45.5%) Candida isolates among which 3 (60.0%) broke through individualized echinocandin prophylaxis. Baseline recipient characteristics are shown in Table 3. Per Table 4, repeat transplantation, Roux-en-Y biliary anastomosis, anastomotic leak, and repeat abdominal surgery were significantly associated with IP-SSI risk. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: The overall IP-SSI rate in our cohort is low compared to published literature supporting effectiveness of current antimicrobial prophylaxis. In this setting, factors that portend risk for IP-SSI are related to the surgical procedures, thus are not easily modifiable. Patients with repeat transplantation, Roux-en-Y biliary anastomosis, anastomotic leak, and repeat abdominal surgery within 3 months of transplantation must be monitored closely for development of IP-SSI. However, the appropriateness of current prophylaxis regimens should be further evaluated given the high prevalence of drug-resistant pathogens causing breakthrough IP-SSI. DISCLOSURES: Matt Harris, PharmD, MHS, wolters kluer: Advisor/Consultant Barbara D. Alexander, MD, F2G Pharmaceuticals: Advisor/Consultant|HealthTrackRx: Advisor/Consultant|HealthTrackRx: Board Member|Leadiaint: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Scynexis: Grant/Research Support|Thermofisher: Advisor/Consultant