Cargando…

2600. Incidence of Non-COVID Pneumonia Before and After Mask Mandate at a Midwestern Hospital: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND: The introduction of universal masking policies at many American healthcare institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic represented a major shift in infection prevention protocol. However, despite their widespread use, previous data on face masks as a tool for preventing respiratory infecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Szabadi, Stephen B, Koenig, Katelyn, Gauss, Chester, Sila, Zachary, Reddy, Adithya, Huffman, Cuyler, Dewey, John, Liu, Gordon, Olken, Melissa H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677485/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2215
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The introduction of universal masking policies at many American healthcare institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic represented a major shift in infection prevention protocol. However, despite their widespread use, previous data on face masks as a tool for preventing respiratory infections before COVID have been mixed, frequently showing no benefit. This study examines the impact of a universal face mask policy on rates of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), and other non-COVID pneumonias of indeterminate etiology at Ascension Borgess Hospital in Kalamazoo, Michigan. METHODS: An analytical cross-sectional study was performed comparing patient data from March through September 2019 with the same period in 2020 for any patient admitted with any ICD-10 code for pneumonia. Chi-square analysis was employed to determine pneumonia frequency by subtype, pre and post-mandate. A significance level of p < 0.05 was used for all tests. RESULTS: 1187 patient records were collected, 28 were excluded for incompleteness, and 1159 were included in our analysis. The study population was 81.80% White and 53.66% male. 670 patients (57.81%) were pre-mask mandate and 487 (42.19%) were post-mandate. Pre-mandate, 107 patients had HAP, 575 had all-cause pneumonia (non-COVID pneumonia of any etiology), and 0 had VAP. Post-mandate, 84 patients had HAP, 2 had VAP, and 376 had all-cause pneumonia. A significant difference was observed in the number of all-cause pneumonia cases between pre and post-mandate (χ(2) = 13.3058, p < 0.0001), but not in HAP cases (χ2 = 0.2996, p = 0.5841). There were only two instances of VAP; therefore, inferential statistics were not obtained. [Figure: see text] A significant difference was observed in all-cause pneumonia cases between pre and post-mask mandate implementation (χ2 = 13.3058, p <0.0001), but not in HAP cases (χ2 = 0.2996, p = 0.5841). CONCLUSION: Among hospitalized patients, a significant difference in HAP pre and post-mandate was not observed. However, the incidence of non-COVID pneumonia of any etiology was significantly lower during the mask mandate (p < 0.0001). Wether this difference is attributable to universal masking or other mandated or non-mandated precautionary behaviors in the hospital or community cannot be determined. These results suggest that mask mandates as currently implemented do not prevent HAP, but may play a role in decreasing total pneumonia prevalence in the community. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures