Cargando…

822. Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze: Ophthalmologist Examination for All Hospitalized Patients with Candidemia in a Rural Community

BACKGROUND: Candidemia is a common cause of bloodstream infections in hospitalized patients in the United States. Ocular manifestations of candidemia include chorioretinitis and endophthalmitis, which can lead to the loss of vision. Currently, there are opposing recommendations on whether all patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hyun Sue, Baffoe-Bonnie, Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677490/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.867
_version_ 1785150142287970304
author Kim, Hyun Sue
Baffoe-Bonnie, Anthony
author_facet Kim, Hyun Sue
Baffoe-Bonnie, Anthony
author_sort Kim, Hyun Sue
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Candidemia is a common cause of bloodstream infections in hospitalized patients in the United States. Ocular manifestations of candidemia include chorioretinitis and endophthalmitis, which can lead to the loss of vision. Currently, there are opposing recommendations on whether all patients with candidemia should have a dilated ophthalmologic examination. We describe a rural patient population with candidemia who underwent an ophthalmology consultation and the associated clinical features and risk factors for an abnormal eye exam. We analyze the impact of ophthalmology consults on the treatment, management, and outcome. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of consecutive candidemia cases from 2015 to 2023. We abstracted patient demographics, clinical, and microbiologic data. RESULTS: We found that 218 candidemia patients with an average age of 54 years (range, 5-94) underwent an ophthalmologic evaluation. The average duration between hospital admission and consultation was 12 days. 24% of patients reported visual symptoms at the time of the consult and of those, 49% reported decreased visual acuity. Age, insurance status, and the number of days between hospital admission and consultation were strongly associated with positive findings. CONCLUSION: Abnormal eye findings were not uncommon and were seen more frequently in certain demographic groups. In resource-limited settings, a more nuanced consultation strategy informed by local data may be reasonable. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10677490
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106774902023-11-27 822. Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze: Ophthalmologist Examination for All Hospitalized Patients with Candidemia in a Rural Community Kim, Hyun Sue Baffoe-Bonnie, Anthony Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Candidemia is a common cause of bloodstream infections in hospitalized patients in the United States. Ocular manifestations of candidemia include chorioretinitis and endophthalmitis, which can lead to the loss of vision. Currently, there are opposing recommendations on whether all patients with candidemia should have a dilated ophthalmologic examination. We describe a rural patient population with candidemia who underwent an ophthalmology consultation and the associated clinical features and risk factors for an abnormal eye exam. We analyze the impact of ophthalmology consults on the treatment, management, and outcome. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of consecutive candidemia cases from 2015 to 2023. We abstracted patient demographics, clinical, and microbiologic data. RESULTS: We found that 218 candidemia patients with an average age of 54 years (range, 5-94) underwent an ophthalmologic evaluation. The average duration between hospital admission and consultation was 12 days. 24% of patients reported visual symptoms at the time of the consult and of those, 49% reported decreased visual acuity. Age, insurance status, and the number of days between hospital admission and consultation were strongly associated with positive findings. CONCLUSION: Abnormal eye findings were not uncommon and were seen more frequently in certain demographic groups. In resource-limited settings, a more nuanced consultation strategy informed by local data may be reasonable. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10677490/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.867 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Kim, Hyun Sue
Baffoe-Bonnie, Anthony
822. Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze: Ophthalmologist Examination for All Hospitalized Patients with Candidemia in a Rural Community
title 822. Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze: Ophthalmologist Examination for All Hospitalized Patients with Candidemia in a Rural Community
title_full 822. Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze: Ophthalmologist Examination for All Hospitalized Patients with Candidemia in a Rural Community
title_fullStr 822. Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze: Ophthalmologist Examination for All Hospitalized Patients with Candidemia in a Rural Community
title_full_unstemmed 822. Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze: Ophthalmologist Examination for All Hospitalized Patients with Candidemia in a Rural Community
title_short 822. Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze: Ophthalmologist Examination for All Hospitalized Patients with Candidemia in a Rural Community
title_sort 822. is the juice worth the squeeze: ophthalmologist examination for all hospitalized patients with candidemia in a rural community
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677490/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.867
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhyunsue 822isthejuiceworththesqueezeophthalmologistexaminationforallhospitalizedpatientswithcandidemiainaruralcommunity
AT baffoebonnieanthony 822isthejuiceworththesqueezeophthalmologistexaminationforallhospitalizedpatientswithcandidemiainaruralcommunity