Cargando…

135. Impact of Clostridioides difficile Toxin Confirmation on Subsequent C. difficile Treatment in a Rural Health System (IT-CDI)

BACKGROUND: In January 2020, Ballad Health instituted the American College of Gastroenterology recommended algorithm for CDI diagnosis consisting of a reflex toxin confirmation post positive C. difficile PCR result. The study was designed to assess how the addition of the toxin confirmation impacted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crawford, Jacquelyn, Cluck, David B, Tharp, Jennifer, Finniss, Mathew, Patel, Paras
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677539/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.208
_version_ 1785150153763586048
author Crawford, Jacquelyn
Cluck, David B
Tharp, Jennifer
Finniss, Mathew
Patel, Paras
author_facet Crawford, Jacquelyn
Cluck, David B
Tharp, Jennifer
Finniss, Mathew
Patel, Paras
author_sort Crawford, Jacquelyn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In January 2020, Ballad Health instituted the American College of Gastroenterology recommended algorithm for CDI diagnosis consisting of a reflex toxin confirmation post positive C. difficile PCR result. The study was designed to assess how the addition of the toxin confirmation impacted management of CDI in the inpatient setting. METHODS: IT-CDI was a retrospective, multicenter, observational quasi-experimental study of 200 patients. Patients included in the study were > 17 years old with a positive C. difficile PCR and evaluated in two cohorts, pre-toxin confirmation versus post-toxin confirmation testing. The primary outcome was to determine if adding C. difficile toxin confirmation testing reduced antibiotic prescribing for the treatment of CDI. Secondary outcomes included duration of CDI treatment, impact of infectious diseases consultation, length of stay, accrued costs for C. difficile testing and treatment, and new incidence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus infection. RESULTS: A significant reduction in initiation of treatment was found between cohort 1 (98%) versus cohort 2 (77%) although 54% of toxin-negative patients in cohort 2 still received CDI-targeted therapy. There were also significant reductions in duration of treatment from cohort 1 vs cohort 2 (median 13 vs 12; p=0.002) and hospital length of stay between toxin-positive patients versus toxin-negative patients in cohort 2 (median 13 vs 12; p=0.0027). Infectious disease consultation was not associated with a reduction in treatment and overall incidence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus infection was rare. Additionally, results demonstrated that toxin confirmation testing did not significantly reduce the total cost associated with testing and treatment which included the price of each lab test completed and the sum of inpatient CDI-targeted antimicrobial therapy per patient from cohort 1 vs cohort 2 (median $56 vs $57; p=0.3356). CONCLUSION: The addition of C. difficile toxin confirmation testing to hospital protocol reduced antibiotic prescribing for the treatment of CDI by 21%. However, over half of toxin-negative patients still received CDI antibiotic treatment. Toxin confirmation did not reduce length of stay nor total costs associated with testing and treatment. DISCLOSURES: David B. Cluck, PharmD, BCPS, BCIDP, AAHIVP, Astellas: Advisor/Consultant
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10677539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106775392023-11-27 135. Impact of Clostridioides difficile Toxin Confirmation on Subsequent C. difficile Treatment in a Rural Health System (IT-CDI) Crawford, Jacquelyn Cluck, David B Tharp, Jennifer Finniss, Mathew Patel, Paras Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: In January 2020, Ballad Health instituted the American College of Gastroenterology recommended algorithm for CDI diagnosis consisting of a reflex toxin confirmation post positive C. difficile PCR result. The study was designed to assess how the addition of the toxin confirmation impacted management of CDI in the inpatient setting. METHODS: IT-CDI was a retrospective, multicenter, observational quasi-experimental study of 200 patients. Patients included in the study were > 17 years old with a positive C. difficile PCR and evaluated in two cohorts, pre-toxin confirmation versus post-toxin confirmation testing. The primary outcome was to determine if adding C. difficile toxin confirmation testing reduced antibiotic prescribing for the treatment of CDI. Secondary outcomes included duration of CDI treatment, impact of infectious diseases consultation, length of stay, accrued costs for C. difficile testing and treatment, and new incidence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus infection. RESULTS: A significant reduction in initiation of treatment was found between cohort 1 (98%) versus cohort 2 (77%) although 54% of toxin-negative patients in cohort 2 still received CDI-targeted therapy. There were also significant reductions in duration of treatment from cohort 1 vs cohort 2 (median 13 vs 12; p=0.002) and hospital length of stay between toxin-positive patients versus toxin-negative patients in cohort 2 (median 13 vs 12; p=0.0027). Infectious disease consultation was not associated with a reduction in treatment and overall incidence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus infection was rare. Additionally, results demonstrated that toxin confirmation testing did not significantly reduce the total cost associated with testing and treatment which included the price of each lab test completed and the sum of inpatient CDI-targeted antimicrobial therapy per patient from cohort 1 vs cohort 2 (median $56 vs $57; p=0.3356). CONCLUSION: The addition of C. difficile toxin confirmation testing to hospital protocol reduced antibiotic prescribing for the treatment of CDI by 21%. However, over half of toxin-negative patients still received CDI antibiotic treatment. Toxin confirmation did not reduce length of stay nor total costs associated with testing and treatment. DISCLOSURES: David B. Cluck, PharmD, BCPS, BCIDP, AAHIVP, Astellas: Advisor/Consultant Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10677539/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.208 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Crawford, Jacquelyn
Cluck, David B
Tharp, Jennifer
Finniss, Mathew
Patel, Paras
135. Impact of Clostridioides difficile Toxin Confirmation on Subsequent C. difficile Treatment in a Rural Health System (IT-CDI)
title 135. Impact of Clostridioides difficile Toxin Confirmation on Subsequent C. difficile Treatment in a Rural Health System (IT-CDI)
title_full 135. Impact of Clostridioides difficile Toxin Confirmation on Subsequent C. difficile Treatment in a Rural Health System (IT-CDI)
title_fullStr 135. Impact of Clostridioides difficile Toxin Confirmation on Subsequent C. difficile Treatment in a Rural Health System (IT-CDI)
title_full_unstemmed 135. Impact of Clostridioides difficile Toxin Confirmation on Subsequent C. difficile Treatment in a Rural Health System (IT-CDI)
title_short 135. Impact of Clostridioides difficile Toxin Confirmation on Subsequent C. difficile Treatment in a Rural Health System (IT-CDI)
title_sort 135. impact of clostridioides difficile toxin confirmation on subsequent c. difficile treatment in a rural health system (it-cdi)
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677539/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.208
work_keys_str_mv AT crawfordjacquelyn 135impactofclostridioidesdifficiletoxinconfirmationonsubsequentcdifficiletreatmentinaruralhealthsystemitcdi
AT cluckdavidb 135impactofclostridioidesdifficiletoxinconfirmationonsubsequentcdifficiletreatmentinaruralhealthsystemitcdi
AT tharpjennifer 135impactofclostridioidesdifficiletoxinconfirmationonsubsequentcdifficiletreatmentinaruralhealthsystemitcdi
AT finnissmathew 135impactofclostridioidesdifficiletoxinconfirmationonsubsequentcdifficiletreatmentinaruralhealthsystemitcdi
AT patelparas 135impactofclostridioidesdifficiletoxinconfirmationonsubsequentcdifficiletreatmentinaruralhealthsystemitcdi