Cargando…

1548. Evaluation of rural HIV screening in adults with one or more risk factors

BACKGROUND: The National HIV/AIDS Strategy aims to end the HIV epidemic in the United States by 2030. However, despite significant medical advances in HIV prevention (specifically treatment as prevention), transmission without knowledge of HIV status remains a significant barrier to reducing new inf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pilcher, Finlay, Stedman, Eleanor, Tompkins, Bradley, Hale, Andrew, Singh, Devika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677596/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1383
_version_ 1785150167089938432
author Pilcher, Finlay
Stedman, Eleanor
Tompkins, Bradley
Hale, Andrew
Singh, Devika
author_facet Pilcher, Finlay
Stedman, Eleanor
Tompkins, Bradley
Hale, Andrew
Singh, Devika
author_sort Pilcher, Finlay
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The National HIV/AIDS Strategy aims to end the HIV epidemic in the United States by 2030. However, despite significant medical advances in HIV prevention (specifically treatment as prevention), transmission without knowledge of HIV status remains a significant barrier to reducing new infections. Developing effective and equitable HIV screening methods is an essential step towards HIV elimination. Individuals residing in rural settings across the U.S. have limited access to HIV-literate providers due to complex and multifactorial barriers including long travel distances to appointments, fewer community support resources, and scarcity of specialized HIV care providers. The opt-out approach to HIV screening may be insufficient to adequately reach people living in rural communities, particularly those with elevated risk of HIV transmission. METHODS: Our study used Vermont-specific data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) surveys from 2010 to 2012 and 2016 to 2019. We included participants who responded to three questions in the HIV/AIDS section of the BRFSS. BRFSS surveys from 2013 to 2015 omitted one of the three questions and therefore were excluded from the study. Participants were assigned either a low- or high-risk category based on a question which asked whether they engaged in certain behaviors associated with HIV transmission (e.g., intravenous drug use, condomless anal sex, etc.) over the past year. HIV screening was considered adequate for participants in the low-risk category if they had one or more lifetime HIV test. Participants in the high-risk category were deemed adequately screened if they had been tested for HIV in the past year. RESULTS: The results of the analysis are shown in Table 1. Pearson’s chi-squared value (χ2) was 5.1 with an associated p-value = 0.024 suggesting that the percentage of adequate screening varies significantly with HIV risk category. [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that HIV screening remains suboptimal in Vermont, particularly for those at increased risk of transmission. These findings indicate that more inclusive and expansive strategies including targeted HIV screening may be warranted in rural regions. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10677596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106775962023-11-27 1548. Evaluation of rural HIV screening in adults with one or more risk factors Pilcher, Finlay Stedman, Eleanor Tompkins, Bradley Hale, Andrew Singh, Devika Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: The National HIV/AIDS Strategy aims to end the HIV epidemic in the United States by 2030. However, despite significant medical advances in HIV prevention (specifically treatment as prevention), transmission without knowledge of HIV status remains a significant barrier to reducing new infections. Developing effective and equitable HIV screening methods is an essential step towards HIV elimination. Individuals residing in rural settings across the U.S. have limited access to HIV-literate providers due to complex and multifactorial barriers including long travel distances to appointments, fewer community support resources, and scarcity of specialized HIV care providers. The opt-out approach to HIV screening may be insufficient to adequately reach people living in rural communities, particularly those with elevated risk of HIV transmission. METHODS: Our study used Vermont-specific data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) surveys from 2010 to 2012 and 2016 to 2019. We included participants who responded to three questions in the HIV/AIDS section of the BRFSS. BRFSS surveys from 2013 to 2015 omitted one of the three questions and therefore were excluded from the study. Participants were assigned either a low- or high-risk category based on a question which asked whether they engaged in certain behaviors associated with HIV transmission (e.g., intravenous drug use, condomless anal sex, etc.) over the past year. HIV screening was considered adequate for participants in the low-risk category if they had one or more lifetime HIV test. Participants in the high-risk category were deemed adequately screened if they had been tested for HIV in the past year. RESULTS: The results of the analysis are shown in Table 1. Pearson’s chi-squared value (χ2) was 5.1 with an associated p-value = 0.024 suggesting that the percentage of adequate screening varies significantly with HIV risk category. [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that HIV screening remains suboptimal in Vermont, particularly for those at increased risk of transmission. These findings indicate that more inclusive and expansive strategies including targeted HIV screening may be warranted in rural regions. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10677596/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1383 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Pilcher, Finlay
Stedman, Eleanor
Tompkins, Bradley
Hale, Andrew
Singh, Devika
1548. Evaluation of rural HIV screening in adults with one or more risk factors
title 1548. Evaluation of rural HIV screening in adults with one or more risk factors
title_full 1548. Evaluation of rural HIV screening in adults with one or more risk factors
title_fullStr 1548. Evaluation of rural HIV screening in adults with one or more risk factors
title_full_unstemmed 1548. Evaluation of rural HIV screening in adults with one or more risk factors
title_short 1548. Evaluation of rural HIV screening in adults with one or more risk factors
title_sort 1548. evaluation of rural hiv screening in adults with one or more risk factors
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677596/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1383
work_keys_str_mv AT pilcherfinlay 1548evaluationofruralhivscreeninginadultswithoneormoreriskfactors
AT stedmaneleanor 1548evaluationofruralhivscreeninginadultswithoneormoreriskfactors
AT tompkinsbradley 1548evaluationofruralhivscreeninginadultswithoneormoreriskfactors
AT haleandrew 1548evaluationofruralhivscreeninginadultswithoneormoreriskfactors
AT singhdevika 1548evaluationofruralhivscreeninginadultswithoneormoreriskfactors