Cargando…

186. The Role of Repeated Blood Cultures in Hematologic Malignancy Patients with Neutropenic Fever due to Gram-Negative Bacterial Bloodstream Infections

BACKGROUND: Several observational studies and a recent meta-analysis suggest there is a mortality benefit associated with acquiring repeat blood cultures for gram-negative bacterial bloodstream infections (GNBSI). However, limited data are available among patients with febrile neutropenia. We sought...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dhanaraj, Nitya, Foppiano Palacios, Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677634/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.259
_version_ 1785150176312164352
author Dhanaraj, Nitya
Foppiano Palacios, Carlo
author_facet Dhanaraj, Nitya
Foppiano Palacios, Carlo
author_sort Dhanaraj, Nitya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several observational studies and a recent meta-analysis suggest there is a mortality benefit associated with acquiring repeat blood cultures for gram-negative bacterial bloodstream infections (GNBSI). However, limited data are available among patients with febrile neutropenia. We sought to evaluate the utility of obtaining follow-up blood cultures (FUBC) in GNBSI among neutropenic hematological malignancy patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify all patients with a hematologic malignancy admitted with a diagnosis of neutropenic fever due to gram-negative rod bacteremia (GNRB) from 2018-2021 at a large urban academic medical center. We collected demographics, cancer diagnosis and treatment data, microbiology and antibiotic information, and death at discharge, 30 days, and 90 days. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used. RESULTS: A total of 47 episodes of GNBSI among 43 patients were included. Mean age was 57 years, 61% were male, 49% were White, and 14% were Latino. Most patients had AML (47%), and most common chemotherapy regimen was R-CHOP (19%). 32% of GNRB were due to K. pneumoniae, in the setting of long-term central venous catheter (53%), and from a gastrointestinal source (49%). FUBC were collected among most patients (87%), but only two patients (5%) had positive FUBC. ESBL resistance profiles were uncommon (6%), and most were treated with beta-lactams (55%). Patients who died at discharge were less likely to have FUBC collected (p< 0.001). We also found an association between acquiring FUBC and mortality at 30 (p=0.01) and 90 days (p=0.02). However, there was no association between having a positive FUBC and mortality at discharge (p=0.47), 30 days (p=0.93), and 90 days (p=1.00). CONCLUSION: Among patients with neutropenic fever found to have GNBSI, acquiring repeat blood cultures was associated with decreased mortality. Due to their immunocompromised status, patients with neutropenic fever and GNRB should have repeat blood cultures collected. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10677634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106776342023-11-27 186. The Role of Repeated Blood Cultures in Hematologic Malignancy Patients with Neutropenic Fever due to Gram-Negative Bacterial Bloodstream Infections Dhanaraj, Nitya Foppiano Palacios, Carlo Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Several observational studies and a recent meta-analysis suggest there is a mortality benefit associated with acquiring repeat blood cultures for gram-negative bacterial bloodstream infections (GNBSI). However, limited data are available among patients with febrile neutropenia. We sought to evaluate the utility of obtaining follow-up blood cultures (FUBC) in GNBSI among neutropenic hematological malignancy patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify all patients with a hematologic malignancy admitted with a diagnosis of neutropenic fever due to gram-negative rod bacteremia (GNRB) from 2018-2021 at a large urban academic medical center. We collected demographics, cancer diagnosis and treatment data, microbiology and antibiotic information, and death at discharge, 30 days, and 90 days. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used. RESULTS: A total of 47 episodes of GNBSI among 43 patients were included. Mean age was 57 years, 61% were male, 49% were White, and 14% were Latino. Most patients had AML (47%), and most common chemotherapy regimen was R-CHOP (19%). 32% of GNRB were due to K. pneumoniae, in the setting of long-term central venous catheter (53%), and from a gastrointestinal source (49%). FUBC were collected among most patients (87%), but only two patients (5%) had positive FUBC. ESBL resistance profiles were uncommon (6%), and most were treated with beta-lactams (55%). Patients who died at discharge were less likely to have FUBC collected (p< 0.001). We also found an association between acquiring FUBC and mortality at 30 (p=0.01) and 90 days (p=0.02). However, there was no association between having a positive FUBC and mortality at discharge (p=0.47), 30 days (p=0.93), and 90 days (p=1.00). CONCLUSION: Among patients with neutropenic fever found to have GNBSI, acquiring repeat blood cultures was associated with decreased mortality. Due to their immunocompromised status, patients with neutropenic fever and GNRB should have repeat blood cultures collected. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10677634/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.259 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Dhanaraj, Nitya
Foppiano Palacios, Carlo
186. The Role of Repeated Blood Cultures in Hematologic Malignancy Patients with Neutropenic Fever due to Gram-Negative Bacterial Bloodstream Infections
title 186. The Role of Repeated Blood Cultures in Hematologic Malignancy Patients with Neutropenic Fever due to Gram-Negative Bacterial Bloodstream Infections
title_full 186. The Role of Repeated Blood Cultures in Hematologic Malignancy Patients with Neutropenic Fever due to Gram-Negative Bacterial Bloodstream Infections
title_fullStr 186. The Role of Repeated Blood Cultures in Hematologic Malignancy Patients with Neutropenic Fever due to Gram-Negative Bacterial Bloodstream Infections
title_full_unstemmed 186. The Role of Repeated Blood Cultures in Hematologic Malignancy Patients with Neutropenic Fever due to Gram-Negative Bacterial Bloodstream Infections
title_short 186. The Role of Repeated Blood Cultures in Hematologic Malignancy Patients with Neutropenic Fever due to Gram-Negative Bacterial Bloodstream Infections
title_sort 186. the role of repeated blood cultures in hematologic malignancy patients with neutropenic fever due to gram-negative bacterial bloodstream infections
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677634/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.259
work_keys_str_mv AT dhanarajnitya 186theroleofrepeatedbloodculturesinhematologicmalignancypatientswithneutropenicfeverduetogramnegativebacterialbloodstreaminfections
AT foppianopalacioscarlo 186theroleofrepeatedbloodculturesinhematologicmalignancypatientswithneutropenicfeverduetogramnegativebacterialbloodstreaminfections