Cargando…
699. Clinical Outcomes and Management of NAAT-Positive/Toxin-Negative Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Standalone nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are increasingly used to diagnose Clostridium difficile infections (CDI), although they may be unable to distinguish colonization from disease. A two-stage algorithm pairing NAAT with a toxin immunoassay (Toxin) has been proposed to imp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677791/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.761 |
_version_ | 1785150213445386240 |
---|---|
author | Prosty, Connor Hanula, Ryan Katergi, Khaled Longtin, Yves McDonald, Emily Lee, Todd C |
author_facet | Prosty, Connor Hanula, Ryan Katergi, Khaled Longtin, Yves McDonald, Emily Lee, Todd C |
author_sort | Prosty, Connor |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Standalone nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are increasingly used to diagnose Clostridium difficile infections (CDI), although they may be unable to distinguish colonization from disease. A two-stage algorithm pairing NAAT with a toxin immunoassay (Toxin) has been proposed to improve specificity. We sought to evaluate clinical outcomes among patients testing NAAT+/Toxin+ vs NAAT+/Toxin- by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. We further compared outcomes between NAAT+/Toxin- patients who were and were not treated. METHODS: We searched EMBASE and MEDLINE from inception to September 17, 2022 for articles comparing CDI outcomes among symptomatic patients tested by NAAT and Toxin tests. The risk differences (RD) of all-cause mortality and CDI recurrence were computed by random effects meta-analysis between NAAT+/Toxin+ and NAAT+/Toxin- patients, as well as between treated and untreated NAAT+/Toxin- patients. RESULTS: Twenty-three observational studies comprising 11749 patients were included. 30-Day all-cause mortality was not significantly different between NAAT+/Toxin+ and NAAT+/Toxin- patients (8.4% vs 6.8%, respectively; RD=0.2%, 95%CI -2.4, 2.9; I(2)=52.9%). Recurrence at 60 days was significantly higher among NAAT+/Toxin+ (19.8%) vs NAAT+/Toxin- patients (11.0%) (RD=7.7%, 95%CI=4.6, 10.7, I(2)=37.4%). Among treated compared to untreated NAAT+/Toxin- patients, the all-cause 30-day mortalities were 5.0% and 14.9%, respectively (RD=-9.5%, 95%CI=-15.0, -3.9, I(2)=0.0%), but 60-day recurrence was not significantly different (11.6% vs 7.0%, respectively; RD=5.3%, 95%CI -1.7, 12.2; I(2)=47.0%). CONCLUSION: Compared to NAAT+/Toxin- patients, NAAT+/Toxin+ patients had a greater risk of recurrence at 60 days, but not all-cause mortality. Treatment of NAAT+/Toxin- patients was associated with reduced all-cause mortality, but not recurrence. While subject to the limitations of observational studies including the potential for confounding by indication and immortal time bias, these results suggest that treatment of NAAT+/Toxin- patients may be beneficial. A strategy comparing standalone NAAT or staged testing with up front combined NAAT/Toxin testing could be the topic of a randomized controlled trial to determine cost and efficacy. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10677791 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106777912023-11-27 699. Clinical Outcomes and Management of NAAT-Positive/Toxin-Negative Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Prosty, Connor Hanula, Ryan Katergi, Khaled Longtin, Yves McDonald, Emily Lee, Todd C Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Standalone nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are increasingly used to diagnose Clostridium difficile infections (CDI), although they may be unable to distinguish colonization from disease. A two-stage algorithm pairing NAAT with a toxin immunoassay (Toxin) has been proposed to improve specificity. We sought to evaluate clinical outcomes among patients testing NAAT+/Toxin+ vs NAAT+/Toxin- by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. We further compared outcomes between NAAT+/Toxin- patients who were and were not treated. METHODS: We searched EMBASE and MEDLINE from inception to September 17, 2022 for articles comparing CDI outcomes among symptomatic patients tested by NAAT and Toxin tests. The risk differences (RD) of all-cause mortality and CDI recurrence were computed by random effects meta-analysis between NAAT+/Toxin+ and NAAT+/Toxin- patients, as well as between treated and untreated NAAT+/Toxin- patients. RESULTS: Twenty-three observational studies comprising 11749 patients were included. 30-Day all-cause mortality was not significantly different between NAAT+/Toxin+ and NAAT+/Toxin- patients (8.4% vs 6.8%, respectively; RD=0.2%, 95%CI -2.4, 2.9; I(2)=52.9%). Recurrence at 60 days was significantly higher among NAAT+/Toxin+ (19.8%) vs NAAT+/Toxin- patients (11.0%) (RD=7.7%, 95%CI=4.6, 10.7, I(2)=37.4%). Among treated compared to untreated NAAT+/Toxin- patients, the all-cause 30-day mortalities were 5.0% and 14.9%, respectively (RD=-9.5%, 95%CI=-15.0, -3.9, I(2)=0.0%), but 60-day recurrence was not significantly different (11.6% vs 7.0%, respectively; RD=5.3%, 95%CI -1.7, 12.2; I(2)=47.0%). CONCLUSION: Compared to NAAT+/Toxin- patients, NAAT+/Toxin+ patients had a greater risk of recurrence at 60 days, but not all-cause mortality. Treatment of NAAT+/Toxin- patients was associated with reduced all-cause mortality, but not recurrence. While subject to the limitations of observational studies including the potential for confounding by indication and immortal time bias, these results suggest that treatment of NAAT+/Toxin- patients may be beneficial. A strategy comparing standalone NAAT or staged testing with up front combined NAAT/Toxin testing could be the topic of a randomized controlled trial to determine cost and efficacy. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10677791/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.761 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstract Prosty, Connor Hanula, Ryan Katergi, Khaled Longtin, Yves McDonald, Emily Lee, Todd C 699. Clinical Outcomes and Management of NAAT-Positive/Toxin-Negative Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | 699. Clinical Outcomes and Management of NAAT-Positive/Toxin-Negative Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | 699. Clinical Outcomes and Management of NAAT-Positive/Toxin-Negative Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | 699. Clinical Outcomes and Management of NAAT-Positive/Toxin-Negative Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | 699. Clinical Outcomes and Management of NAAT-Positive/Toxin-Negative Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | 699. Clinical Outcomes and Management of NAAT-Positive/Toxin-Negative Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | 699. clinical outcomes and management of naat-positive/toxin-negative clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Abstract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677791/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.761 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prostyconnor 699clinicaloutcomesandmanagementofnaatpositivetoxinnegativeclostridiumdifficileinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hanularyan 699clinicaloutcomesandmanagementofnaatpositivetoxinnegativeclostridiumdifficileinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT katergikhaled 699clinicaloutcomesandmanagementofnaatpositivetoxinnegativeclostridiumdifficileinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT longtinyves 699clinicaloutcomesandmanagementofnaatpositivetoxinnegativeclostridiumdifficileinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mcdonaldemily 699clinicaloutcomesandmanagementofnaatpositivetoxinnegativeclostridiumdifficileinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leetoddc 699clinicaloutcomesandmanagementofnaatpositivetoxinnegativeclostridiumdifficileinfectionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |