Cargando…
1497. Cryptococcal Antigen Screening and Pre-emptive Fluconazole Therapy in HIV-infected Patients: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study in China
BACKGROUND: The implementation and effectivention of CrAg screening programs and pre-emptive treatment remains unclear in China. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective study at eight hospitals from 1st Jan 2019 to 31st Dec 2020, to evaluate whether CrAg screening programs and preemptive...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677837/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1332 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: The implementation and effectivention of CrAg screening programs and pre-emptive treatment remains unclear in China. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective study at eight hospitals from 1st Jan 2019 to 31st Dec 2020, to evaluate whether CrAg screening programs and preemptive treatment are beneficial for saving lives in China. RESULTS: A total of 12768 PLWH were screened for serum CrAg. The prevalence of serum CrAg positivity was 5.3% (678/12768). Lumbar puncture (LP) records were completed and available in 580 patients. Among them, 36.4% (369/580) were diagnosed with CM, and 63.6% (211/580) were diagnosed with isolated cryptococcal antigenemia (ICA). 123 HIV/ICA patients have available clinical data. Of these patients, a median CD4(+) T-cell counts were 41cells/µL (IQR, 19-83). Upon Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis, patients with no preemptive fluconazole treatment had a threefold higher risk of CM and/or death [19.0% (8/42) vs 8.6% (7/81), p=0.037] compared to the preemptive fluconazole treatment participants. However, there was no statistically significant difference for the development of CM and/or death in different dosage (therapy as per WHO recommendations vs oral fluconazole 400mg daily therapy) of fluconazole therapy (p=0.836). Also, we found no statistically significant difference in the proportion of CrAg negativity [60.0% (12/20) vs 54.5% (18/33), p=0.779] and the median time from positivity to negativity of serum CrAg [14 (IOR:9.25, 14) vs 14 (10.5, 15), p=1.000] within one year follow up. In our study, Patients who with virological suppression had a lower incidence of CM and/or death than patients who with virological non-suppression [5.6% (1/18) vs (17.2% (5/29), p=0.384], however, there was no statistically significant difference in Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Rapid ART initiation, appropriate CrAg screening are essential for advanced PLWH. Lp is a necessary intervention in advanced HIV-infected patients for CrAg positive individual to prevent potential missed diagnosis and mistreatment of CM. Targeted improvements to pre-emptive antifungal therapy for cryptococcal antigenemia are required to further improve patient outcomes in CrAg-positive severely immunocompromised people with HIV/AIDS. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures |
---|