Cargando…
1465. Two- versus Three-Gram Cefazolin Dosing for Surgical Prophylaxis in Colorectal Surgery Procedures
BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend an elevated dose of cefazolin 3 grams for surgical prophylaxis in patients weighing ≥ 120 kg. This recommendation was made based on limited pharmacokinetic data, low cost, and favorable safety profile of cefazolin. Since the release of these recommendat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677871/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1302 |
_version_ | 1785150232041881600 |
---|---|
author | Collins, Curtis D Hartsfield, Eric Cleary, Robert K Brockhaus, Kara K |
author_facet | Collins, Curtis D Hartsfield, Eric Cleary, Robert K Brockhaus, Kara K |
author_sort | Collins, Curtis D |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend an elevated dose of cefazolin 3 grams for surgical prophylaxis in patients weighing ≥ 120 kg. This recommendation was made based on limited pharmacokinetic data, low cost, and favorable safety profile of cefazolin. Since the release of these recommendations nearly a decade ago few analyses have investigated the impact of these elevated dosing recommendations on surgical outcomes. METHODS: A multi-center, retrospective cohort study was performed utilizing available data from a large, validated database of elective colorectal surgeries in Michigan. Adult patients weighing ≥ 120 kg who received cefazolin and metronidazole for surgical prophylaxis between July 2012 and June 2021 were included. Emergent or urgent surgeries, missing follow-up and antibiotic information, and patients who did not receive either 2 or 3-grams of cefazolin with 500 mg metronidazole were excluded. The primary objective was to evaluate the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) between patients receiving 2 grams versus 3 grams of cefazolin. Secondary objectives analyzed the incidence Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) between cohorts. The impact of cefazolin dosing and confounders was tested through a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: Six-hundred-fifty procedures were included. Four-hundred nine patients (62.9%) received 3-grams cefazolin prophylaxis and 241 (37.1%) received 2-grams. The cohorts were similar with a significant difference in median body mass index in the 3-gram cohort (41 vs. 41; p = 0.023). There was no difference between 2- and 3-gram cohorts in SSIs (8% vs. 9%, p = 0.745) or CDI (1.2% vs. 0.7%; p =0.510). A significant difference in compliance with recommended antibiotic timing (93.8% vs. 88%; p = 0.017) was noted. Multivariable logistic regression showed 3-gram prophylaxis was not associated with a change in SSIs (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1; 95% CI 0.54 to 1.85; p = 0.994). CONCLUSION: Three-gram cefazolin dosing in combination with metronidazole in obese patients for surgical prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery procedures was not associated with changes in SSIs or CDI. DISCLOSURES: Robert K. Cleary, MD, FASCRS, FACS, Intuitive Surgical Inc: Honoraria |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10677871 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106778712023-11-27 1465. Two- versus Three-Gram Cefazolin Dosing for Surgical Prophylaxis in Colorectal Surgery Procedures Collins, Curtis D Hartsfield, Eric Cleary, Robert K Brockhaus, Kara K Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend an elevated dose of cefazolin 3 grams for surgical prophylaxis in patients weighing ≥ 120 kg. This recommendation was made based on limited pharmacokinetic data, low cost, and favorable safety profile of cefazolin. Since the release of these recommendations nearly a decade ago few analyses have investigated the impact of these elevated dosing recommendations on surgical outcomes. METHODS: A multi-center, retrospective cohort study was performed utilizing available data from a large, validated database of elective colorectal surgeries in Michigan. Adult patients weighing ≥ 120 kg who received cefazolin and metronidazole for surgical prophylaxis between July 2012 and June 2021 were included. Emergent or urgent surgeries, missing follow-up and antibiotic information, and patients who did not receive either 2 or 3-grams of cefazolin with 500 mg metronidazole were excluded. The primary objective was to evaluate the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) between patients receiving 2 grams versus 3 grams of cefazolin. Secondary objectives analyzed the incidence Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) between cohorts. The impact of cefazolin dosing and confounders was tested through a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: Six-hundred-fifty procedures were included. Four-hundred nine patients (62.9%) received 3-grams cefazolin prophylaxis and 241 (37.1%) received 2-grams. The cohorts were similar with a significant difference in median body mass index in the 3-gram cohort (41 vs. 41; p = 0.023). There was no difference between 2- and 3-gram cohorts in SSIs (8% vs. 9%, p = 0.745) or CDI (1.2% vs. 0.7%; p =0.510). A significant difference in compliance with recommended antibiotic timing (93.8% vs. 88%; p = 0.017) was noted. Multivariable logistic regression showed 3-gram prophylaxis was not associated with a change in SSIs (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1; 95% CI 0.54 to 1.85; p = 0.994). CONCLUSION: Three-gram cefazolin dosing in combination with metronidazole in obese patients for surgical prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery procedures was not associated with changes in SSIs or CDI. DISCLOSURES: Robert K. Cleary, MD, FASCRS, FACS, Intuitive Surgical Inc: Honoraria Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10677871/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1302 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstract Collins, Curtis D Hartsfield, Eric Cleary, Robert K Brockhaus, Kara K 1465. Two- versus Three-Gram Cefazolin Dosing for Surgical Prophylaxis in Colorectal Surgery Procedures |
title | 1465. Two- versus Three-Gram Cefazolin Dosing for Surgical Prophylaxis in Colorectal Surgery Procedures |
title_full | 1465. Two- versus Three-Gram Cefazolin Dosing for Surgical Prophylaxis in Colorectal Surgery Procedures |
title_fullStr | 1465. Two- versus Three-Gram Cefazolin Dosing for Surgical Prophylaxis in Colorectal Surgery Procedures |
title_full_unstemmed | 1465. Two- versus Three-Gram Cefazolin Dosing for Surgical Prophylaxis in Colorectal Surgery Procedures |
title_short | 1465. Two- versus Three-Gram Cefazolin Dosing for Surgical Prophylaxis in Colorectal Surgery Procedures |
title_sort | 1465. two- versus three-gram cefazolin dosing for surgical prophylaxis in colorectal surgery procedures |
topic | Abstract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677871/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1302 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT collinscurtisd 1465twoversusthreegramcefazolindosingforsurgicalprophylaxisincolorectalsurgeryprocedures AT hartsfielderic 1465twoversusthreegramcefazolindosingforsurgicalprophylaxisincolorectalsurgeryprocedures AT clearyrobertk 1465twoversusthreegramcefazolindosingforsurgicalprophylaxisincolorectalsurgeryprocedures AT brockhauskarak 1465twoversusthreegramcefazolindosingforsurgicalprophylaxisincolorectalsurgeryprocedures |