Cargando…

200. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes among Patients Treated with Ceftriaxone 2 Grams versus 1 Gram Daily for Gram-Negative Bacteremia

BACKGROUND: Ceftriaxone (CRO) is commonly utilized for the treatment of Gram-negative infections. However, there are limited data on the appropriate dose of CRO for the treatment of Gram-negative bacteremia. This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of CRO 2 grams versus 1 gram daily for Gram...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huynh-Phan, Ricky, Zidaru, Andrei, Phe, Kady
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677896/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.273
_version_ 1785150238084825088
author Huynh-Phan, Ricky
Zidaru, Andrei
Phe, Kady
author_facet Huynh-Phan, Ricky
Zidaru, Andrei
Phe, Kady
author_sort Huynh-Phan, Ricky
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ceftriaxone (CRO) is commonly utilized for the treatment of Gram-negative infections. However, there are limited data on the appropriate dose of CRO for the treatment of Gram-negative bacteremia. This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of CRO 2 grams versus 1 gram daily for Gram-negative bacteremia. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center study of patients with Gram-negative bacteremia that received CRO for ≥ 72 hours or over 50% of treatment duration as definitive treatment. Patients were excluded if they had polymicrobial bacteremia, had bacteremia with a Gram-negative organism that was resistant to CRO, or received empiric antibiotics other than CRO for ≥ 72 hours. Definitive treatment was defined as antibiotic utilized after the antibiotic susceptibility report was available to the clinician. Treatment failure was defined as antibiotic escalation due to clinical worsening at any time during CRO therapy. The primary endpoint for this study was 30-day hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints were treatment failure, readmission rates, and adverse reactions. RESULTS: Of 127 patients included, 57% received CRO 2 grams and 43% received 1 gram. The mean APACHE-II score did not differ between the 2 grams and 1 gram groups (13.8 ± 5.97 versus 12.5 ± 5.61, respectively; p = 0.238). Hypoalbuminemia was present in 21% of patients in the 2 grams group compared to 20% in the 1 gram group (p = 1.00). The most common Gram-negative bacteria isolated were Escherichia coli and Klebsiella species in 68% and 24% of patients, respectively. Hospital mortality in the entire cohort was 4% (n = 127). Patients receiving 2 grams had a numerically higher 30-day hospital mortality rate (7% versus 0%; p = 0.069). Patients receiving 2 grams also had numerically higher rates of treatment failure (15% versus 5%; p = 0.094). Readmission due to infection did not differ between groups (8% versus 5%; p = 0.731). Overall, ceftriaxone was well tolerated in both groups with no reported adverse reactions. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in hospital mortality among patients treated with ceftriaxone 2 grams versus 1 gram for Gram-negative bacteremia. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10677896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106778962023-11-27 200. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes among Patients Treated with Ceftriaxone 2 Grams versus 1 Gram Daily for Gram-Negative Bacteremia Huynh-Phan, Ricky Zidaru, Andrei Phe, Kady Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Ceftriaxone (CRO) is commonly utilized for the treatment of Gram-negative infections. However, there are limited data on the appropriate dose of CRO for the treatment of Gram-negative bacteremia. This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of CRO 2 grams versus 1 gram daily for Gram-negative bacteremia. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center study of patients with Gram-negative bacteremia that received CRO for ≥ 72 hours or over 50% of treatment duration as definitive treatment. Patients were excluded if they had polymicrobial bacteremia, had bacteremia with a Gram-negative organism that was resistant to CRO, or received empiric antibiotics other than CRO for ≥ 72 hours. Definitive treatment was defined as antibiotic utilized after the antibiotic susceptibility report was available to the clinician. Treatment failure was defined as antibiotic escalation due to clinical worsening at any time during CRO therapy. The primary endpoint for this study was 30-day hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints were treatment failure, readmission rates, and adverse reactions. RESULTS: Of 127 patients included, 57% received CRO 2 grams and 43% received 1 gram. The mean APACHE-II score did not differ between the 2 grams and 1 gram groups (13.8 ± 5.97 versus 12.5 ± 5.61, respectively; p = 0.238). Hypoalbuminemia was present in 21% of patients in the 2 grams group compared to 20% in the 1 gram group (p = 1.00). The most common Gram-negative bacteria isolated were Escherichia coli and Klebsiella species in 68% and 24% of patients, respectively. Hospital mortality in the entire cohort was 4% (n = 127). Patients receiving 2 grams had a numerically higher 30-day hospital mortality rate (7% versus 0%; p = 0.069). Patients receiving 2 grams also had numerically higher rates of treatment failure (15% versus 5%; p = 0.094). Readmission due to infection did not differ between groups (8% versus 5%; p = 0.731). Overall, ceftriaxone was well tolerated in both groups with no reported adverse reactions. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in hospital mortality among patients treated with ceftriaxone 2 grams versus 1 gram for Gram-negative bacteremia. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10677896/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.273 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Huynh-Phan, Ricky
Zidaru, Andrei
Phe, Kady
200. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes among Patients Treated with Ceftriaxone 2 Grams versus 1 Gram Daily for Gram-Negative Bacteremia
title 200. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes among Patients Treated with Ceftriaxone 2 Grams versus 1 Gram Daily for Gram-Negative Bacteremia
title_full 200. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes among Patients Treated with Ceftriaxone 2 Grams versus 1 Gram Daily for Gram-Negative Bacteremia
title_fullStr 200. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes among Patients Treated with Ceftriaxone 2 Grams versus 1 Gram Daily for Gram-Negative Bacteremia
title_full_unstemmed 200. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes among Patients Treated with Ceftriaxone 2 Grams versus 1 Gram Daily for Gram-Negative Bacteremia
title_short 200. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes among Patients Treated with Ceftriaxone 2 Grams versus 1 Gram Daily for Gram-Negative Bacteremia
title_sort 200. comparison of clinical outcomes among patients treated with ceftriaxone 2 grams versus 1 gram daily for gram-negative bacteremia
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677896/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.273
work_keys_str_mv AT huynhphanricky 200comparisonofclinicaloutcomesamongpatientstreatedwithceftriaxone2gramsversus1gramdailyforgramnegativebacteremia
AT zidaruandrei 200comparisonofclinicaloutcomesamongpatientstreatedwithceftriaxone2gramsversus1gramdailyforgramnegativebacteremia
AT phekady 200comparisonofclinicaloutcomesamongpatientstreatedwithceftriaxone2gramsversus1gramdailyforgramnegativebacteremia