Cargando…

242. Evaluation of PBP4 promoter variation and clinical outcomes in patients with Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia

BACKGROUND: Penicillin-binding protein 4 (PBP4) is a low affinity PBP that has been associated with decreased susceptibility to penicillins in Enterococcus faecalis (Efs). Changes in the promoter region leading to increased expression of the pbp4 gene contribute to this phenotype. There is limited d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atterstrom, Rachel, Tran, Truc T, Nisar, Tariq, Panesso, Diana, Singh, Kavindra, Streling, Ana, Rizvi, Samie A, Simar, Shelby R, Egge, Stephanie, Dinh, An, Contreras, German, Hanson, Blake M, Zervos, Marcus, Abbo, Lilian M, Shimose, Luis, Shelburne, Samuel A, Arias, Cesar A, Miller, William R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677939/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.315
_version_ 1785150248035811328
author Atterstrom, Rachel
Tran, Truc T
Nisar, Tariq
Panesso, Diana
Singh, Kavindra
Streling, Ana
Rizvi, Samie A
Simar, Shelby R
Egge, Stephanie
Dinh, An
Contreras, German
Hanson, Blake M
Zervos, Marcus
Abbo, Lilian M
Shimose, Luis
Shelburne, Samuel A
Arias, Cesar A
Miller, William R
author_facet Atterstrom, Rachel
Tran, Truc T
Nisar, Tariq
Panesso, Diana
Singh, Kavindra
Streling, Ana
Rizvi, Samie A
Simar, Shelby R
Egge, Stephanie
Dinh, An
Contreras, German
Hanson, Blake M
Zervos, Marcus
Abbo, Lilian M
Shimose, Luis
Shelburne, Samuel A
Arias, Cesar A
Miller, William R
author_sort Atterstrom, Rachel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Penicillin-binding protein 4 (PBP4) is a low affinity PBP that has been associated with decreased susceptibility to penicillins in Enterococcus faecalis (Efs). Changes in the promoter region leading to increased expression of the pbp4 gene contribute to this phenotype. There is limited data on the clinical outcome of patients infected with these strains in the U.S. We investigated the clinical outcomes of patients with Efs bacteremia stratified by PBP4 promoter type and piperacillin MIC. METHODS: Index Efs bloodstream isolates from 167 patients were selected from the VENOUS cohort (2016-2021). Whole genome sequencing was performed on all isolates and changes in the promoter region (200 bp upstream of the start codon) were identified, using Efs JH2-2 as reference. β-lactam susceptibility (ampicillin, penicillin, and piperacillin [PIP]) was performed on all isolates by broth microdilution. Clinical outcomes (in-hospital mortality, microbiologic failure, and recurrence) were collected on all patients. RESULTS: The median age for the cohort was 65 years (IQR: 56-72), and 63.5% were male. The median length of hospitalization was 13 days (IQR: 8-22). The duration of bacteremia was 3 days (IQR: 2-4) and 8.98% of patients had prolonged bacteremia (≥ 7 days). Among 167 isolates, 4 major primary promoter variants were identified: reference JH2-2 (n=66), ΔA88 (n=43), A175C (n=35), and insA192 (n=20). All strains were susceptible to ampicillin and penicillin. A PIP MIC ≥ 16 mg/L (non-susceptible) was found in 74.4% of strains with the ΔA88 promoter, as compared to 22.7% of reference, 17.1% of A175C, and 10% of insA192 (p < 0.001). Clinical outcomes of the 167 patients are shown in Table 1. PIP non-susceptibility was associated with immunocompromise state (49.09% vs 23.85%, p=0.001), history of hematological cancer (40% vs 16.51%, p=0.002), and recurrence (7.27% vs 0.92%, p=0.044). There was no statistical difference in mortality or microbiologic failure. [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Isolates with ΔA88 PBP4 promoter variants were associated with PIP non-susceptibility. While in-hospital mortality and microbiologic failure were similar between all patients, those who were infected with a PIP non-susceptible strain were more likely to experience a recurrence. DISCLOSURES: Marcus Zervos, MD, Contrafect: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Johnson and Johnson: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Lilian M. Abbo, MD, MBA, Ferring: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Regeneron: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant William R. Miller, M.D, Merck: Grant/Research Support|UpToDate: Honoraria
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10677939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106779392023-11-27 242. Evaluation of PBP4 promoter variation and clinical outcomes in patients with Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia Atterstrom, Rachel Tran, Truc T Nisar, Tariq Panesso, Diana Singh, Kavindra Streling, Ana Rizvi, Samie A Simar, Shelby R Egge, Stephanie Dinh, An Contreras, German Hanson, Blake M Zervos, Marcus Abbo, Lilian M Shimose, Luis Shelburne, Samuel A Arias, Cesar A Miller, William R Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Penicillin-binding protein 4 (PBP4) is a low affinity PBP that has been associated with decreased susceptibility to penicillins in Enterococcus faecalis (Efs). Changes in the promoter region leading to increased expression of the pbp4 gene contribute to this phenotype. There is limited data on the clinical outcome of patients infected with these strains in the U.S. We investigated the clinical outcomes of patients with Efs bacteremia stratified by PBP4 promoter type and piperacillin MIC. METHODS: Index Efs bloodstream isolates from 167 patients were selected from the VENOUS cohort (2016-2021). Whole genome sequencing was performed on all isolates and changes in the promoter region (200 bp upstream of the start codon) were identified, using Efs JH2-2 as reference. β-lactam susceptibility (ampicillin, penicillin, and piperacillin [PIP]) was performed on all isolates by broth microdilution. Clinical outcomes (in-hospital mortality, microbiologic failure, and recurrence) were collected on all patients. RESULTS: The median age for the cohort was 65 years (IQR: 56-72), and 63.5% were male. The median length of hospitalization was 13 days (IQR: 8-22). The duration of bacteremia was 3 days (IQR: 2-4) and 8.98% of patients had prolonged bacteremia (≥ 7 days). Among 167 isolates, 4 major primary promoter variants were identified: reference JH2-2 (n=66), ΔA88 (n=43), A175C (n=35), and insA192 (n=20). All strains were susceptible to ampicillin and penicillin. A PIP MIC ≥ 16 mg/L (non-susceptible) was found in 74.4% of strains with the ΔA88 promoter, as compared to 22.7% of reference, 17.1% of A175C, and 10% of insA192 (p < 0.001). Clinical outcomes of the 167 patients are shown in Table 1. PIP non-susceptibility was associated with immunocompromise state (49.09% vs 23.85%, p=0.001), history of hematological cancer (40% vs 16.51%, p=0.002), and recurrence (7.27% vs 0.92%, p=0.044). There was no statistical difference in mortality or microbiologic failure. [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Isolates with ΔA88 PBP4 promoter variants were associated with PIP non-susceptibility. While in-hospital mortality and microbiologic failure were similar between all patients, those who were infected with a PIP non-susceptible strain were more likely to experience a recurrence. DISCLOSURES: Marcus Zervos, MD, Contrafect: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Johnson and Johnson: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Lilian M. Abbo, MD, MBA, Ferring: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Regeneron: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant William R. Miller, M.D, Merck: Grant/Research Support|UpToDate: Honoraria Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10677939/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.315 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Atterstrom, Rachel
Tran, Truc T
Nisar, Tariq
Panesso, Diana
Singh, Kavindra
Streling, Ana
Rizvi, Samie A
Simar, Shelby R
Egge, Stephanie
Dinh, An
Contreras, German
Hanson, Blake M
Zervos, Marcus
Abbo, Lilian M
Shimose, Luis
Shelburne, Samuel A
Arias, Cesar A
Miller, William R
242. Evaluation of PBP4 promoter variation and clinical outcomes in patients with Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia
title 242. Evaluation of PBP4 promoter variation and clinical outcomes in patients with Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia
title_full 242. Evaluation of PBP4 promoter variation and clinical outcomes in patients with Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia
title_fullStr 242. Evaluation of PBP4 promoter variation and clinical outcomes in patients with Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia
title_full_unstemmed 242. Evaluation of PBP4 promoter variation and clinical outcomes in patients with Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia
title_short 242. Evaluation of PBP4 promoter variation and clinical outcomes in patients with Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia
title_sort 242. evaluation of pbp4 promoter variation and clinical outcomes in patients with enterococcus faecalis bacteremia
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677939/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.315
work_keys_str_mv AT atterstromrachel 242evaluationofpbp4promotervariationandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithenterococcusfaecalisbacteremia
AT trantruct 242evaluationofpbp4promotervariationandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithenterococcusfaecalisbacteremia
AT nisartariq 242evaluationofpbp4promotervariationandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithenterococcusfaecalisbacteremia
AT panessodiana 242evaluationofpbp4promotervariationandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithenterococcusfaecalisbacteremia
AT singhkavindra 242evaluationofpbp4promotervariationandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithenterococcusfaecalisbacteremia
AT strelingana 242evaluationofpbp4promotervariationandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithenterococcusfaecalisbacteremia
AT rizvisamiea 242evaluationofpbp4promotervariationandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithenterococcusfaecalisbacteremia
AT simarshelbyr 242evaluationofpbp4promotervariationandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithenterococcusfaecalisbacteremia
AT eggestephanie 242evaluationofpbp4promotervariationandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithenterococcusfaecalisbacteremia
AT dinhan 242evaluationofpbp4promotervariationandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithenterococcusfaecalisbacteremia
AT contrerasgerman 242evaluationofpbp4promotervariationandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithenterococcusfaecalisbacteremia
AT hansonblakem 242evaluationofpbp4promotervariationandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithenterococcusfaecalisbacteremia
AT zervosmarcus 242evaluationofpbp4promotervariationandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithenterococcusfaecalisbacteremia
AT abbolilianm 242evaluationofpbp4promotervariationandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithenterococcusfaecalisbacteremia
AT shimoseluis 242evaluationofpbp4promotervariationandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithenterococcusfaecalisbacteremia
AT shelburnesamuela 242evaluationofpbp4promotervariationandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithenterococcusfaecalisbacteremia
AT ariascesara 242evaluationofpbp4promotervariationandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithenterococcusfaecalisbacteremia
AT millerwilliamr 242evaluationofpbp4promotervariationandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithenterococcusfaecalisbacteremia