Cargando…

1420. Optimizing the detection of environmental fungal contamination by comparing sample collection and detection methods

BACKGROUND: The use of environmental sampling to surveil the healthcare environment for invasive fungal species to prevent or respond to outbreaks is limited due to the absence of established threshold values and standard practices. This study aims to fill this gap by comparing sampling and detectio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Warren, Bobby G, Graves, Amanda M, Barrett, Aaron, Nelson, Alicia, Stiegel, Matthew, Smith, Becky A, Schwartz, Ilan, Anderson, Deverick J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677960/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1257
_version_ 1785150252928466944
author Warren, Bobby G
Graves, Amanda M
Barrett, Aaron
Nelson, Alicia
Stiegel, Matthew
Smith, Becky A
Schwartz, Ilan
Anderson, Deverick J
author_facet Warren, Bobby G
Graves, Amanda M
Barrett, Aaron
Nelson, Alicia
Stiegel, Matthew
Smith, Becky A
Schwartz, Ilan
Anderson, Deverick J
author_sort Warren, Bobby G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of environmental sampling to surveil the healthcare environment for invasive fungal species to prevent or respond to outbreaks is limited due to the absence of established threshold values and standard practices. This study aims to fill this gap by comparing sampling and detection methods in a controlled experimental setting. METHODS: We compared the sampling efficacy of commonly used healthcare sampling techniques and the detection efficacy of culture-based and qPCR quantification on common healthcare surface materials. The primary outcome was recovery of organisms, defined as total recovered CFU compared to known inoculum CFU. Mock 10x10cm study surfaces (aluminum, formica, linen, and HEPA material) were inoculated with ∼10(4) CFU of Aspergillus fumigatus or Candida parapsilosis and allowed to air dry. Foam sponges and flocked swabs pre-moistened with neutralizing buffer were used to sample the complete surface area of surfaces. RODAC plates filled with species-specific media were pressed to the middle of the study surface and removed. Sponges were processed using the stomacher technique and swabs were vortexed in PBS. Eluents from sponges and swabs were used for both culture-based quantification and qPCR using FungiQuant primers and probe for the fungal 18S rRNA gene. RESULTS: 20 experiments were completed for each combination of species (n=2), study surface (n=4), sampling method (n=3) and quantification method (n=2) resulting in 960 total samples. Overall, median percent recovery for culture-based and qPCR-based detection methods were 6.4% (IQR: 2.8-12.9) and 26.7% (10.5-48.1), respectively, (p< 0.01). Median percent recovery for sponges and swabs were 17.9% (11.4-30.0) and 3.8% (1.9-6.7) via culture (p< 0.01) and 36.2% (25.7-78.4) and 10.5% (7.7-36.0) via qPCR (p< 0.01). RODAC median percent recovery via culture was 3.4% (1.0-7.1). Fungal Recovery Characteristics by Fungal Species and Sample and Detection Methodology [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: qPCR-based detection had the highest median percent recovery compared to culture-based detection overall, regardless of sample method or study surface. Sponge samples had the highest median percent recovery for both culture- and qPCR-based detection methods, overall. Future studies are needed to assess our study’s identified optimized sample collection and detection techniques in a real-world healthcare environment. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10677960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106779602023-11-27 1420. Optimizing the detection of environmental fungal contamination by comparing sample collection and detection methods Warren, Bobby G Graves, Amanda M Barrett, Aaron Nelson, Alicia Stiegel, Matthew Smith, Becky A Schwartz, Ilan Anderson, Deverick J Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: The use of environmental sampling to surveil the healthcare environment for invasive fungal species to prevent or respond to outbreaks is limited due to the absence of established threshold values and standard practices. This study aims to fill this gap by comparing sampling and detection methods in a controlled experimental setting. METHODS: We compared the sampling efficacy of commonly used healthcare sampling techniques and the detection efficacy of culture-based and qPCR quantification on common healthcare surface materials. The primary outcome was recovery of organisms, defined as total recovered CFU compared to known inoculum CFU. Mock 10x10cm study surfaces (aluminum, formica, linen, and HEPA material) were inoculated with ∼10(4) CFU of Aspergillus fumigatus or Candida parapsilosis and allowed to air dry. Foam sponges and flocked swabs pre-moistened with neutralizing buffer were used to sample the complete surface area of surfaces. RODAC plates filled with species-specific media were pressed to the middle of the study surface and removed. Sponges were processed using the stomacher technique and swabs were vortexed in PBS. Eluents from sponges and swabs were used for both culture-based quantification and qPCR using FungiQuant primers and probe for the fungal 18S rRNA gene. RESULTS: 20 experiments were completed for each combination of species (n=2), study surface (n=4), sampling method (n=3) and quantification method (n=2) resulting in 960 total samples. Overall, median percent recovery for culture-based and qPCR-based detection methods were 6.4% (IQR: 2.8-12.9) and 26.7% (10.5-48.1), respectively, (p< 0.01). Median percent recovery for sponges and swabs were 17.9% (11.4-30.0) and 3.8% (1.9-6.7) via culture (p< 0.01) and 36.2% (25.7-78.4) and 10.5% (7.7-36.0) via qPCR (p< 0.01). RODAC median percent recovery via culture was 3.4% (1.0-7.1). Fungal Recovery Characteristics by Fungal Species and Sample and Detection Methodology [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: qPCR-based detection had the highest median percent recovery compared to culture-based detection overall, regardless of sample method or study surface. Sponge samples had the highest median percent recovery for both culture- and qPCR-based detection methods, overall. Future studies are needed to assess our study’s identified optimized sample collection and detection techniques in a real-world healthcare environment. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10677960/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1257 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Warren, Bobby G
Graves, Amanda M
Barrett, Aaron
Nelson, Alicia
Stiegel, Matthew
Smith, Becky A
Schwartz, Ilan
Anderson, Deverick J
1420. Optimizing the detection of environmental fungal contamination by comparing sample collection and detection methods
title 1420. Optimizing the detection of environmental fungal contamination by comparing sample collection and detection methods
title_full 1420. Optimizing the detection of environmental fungal contamination by comparing sample collection and detection methods
title_fullStr 1420. Optimizing the detection of environmental fungal contamination by comparing sample collection and detection methods
title_full_unstemmed 1420. Optimizing the detection of environmental fungal contamination by comparing sample collection and detection methods
title_short 1420. Optimizing the detection of environmental fungal contamination by comparing sample collection and detection methods
title_sort 1420. optimizing the detection of environmental fungal contamination by comparing sample collection and detection methods
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677960/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1257
work_keys_str_mv AT warrenbobbyg 1420optimizingthedetectionofenvironmentalfungalcontaminationbycomparingsamplecollectionanddetectionmethods
AT gravesamandam 1420optimizingthedetectionofenvironmentalfungalcontaminationbycomparingsamplecollectionanddetectionmethods
AT barrettaaron 1420optimizingthedetectionofenvironmentalfungalcontaminationbycomparingsamplecollectionanddetectionmethods
AT nelsonalicia 1420optimizingthedetectionofenvironmentalfungalcontaminationbycomparingsamplecollectionanddetectionmethods
AT stiegelmatthew 1420optimizingthedetectionofenvironmentalfungalcontaminationbycomparingsamplecollectionanddetectionmethods
AT smithbeckya 1420optimizingthedetectionofenvironmentalfungalcontaminationbycomparingsamplecollectionanddetectionmethods
AT schwartzilan 1420optimizingthedetectionofenvironmentalfungalcontaminationbycomparingsamplecollectionanddetectionmethods
AT andersondeverickj 1420optimizingthedetectionofenvironmentalfungalcontaminationbycomparingsamplecollectionanddetectionmethods