Cargando…
1112. Ceftobiprole for the Treatment of Invasive Enterococcus faecalis Infections: Ampicillin, "Should I Stay or Should I Go?"
BACKGROUND: Enterococcus faecalis is responsible for many serious infections for which combination bactericidal therapy is required(1). A synergism between amoxicillin and cefotaxime against E. faecalis through partial saturation of penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) 4 and 5 by amoxicillin and total...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677992/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.085 |
_version_ | 1785150260398522368 |
---|---|
author | Giuliano, Simone D’Elia, Denise Angelini, Jacopo Pagotto, Alberto Flammini, Sarah Campanile, Floriana tascini, Carlo |
author_facet | Giuliano, Simone D’Elia, Denise Angelini, Jacopo Pagotto, Alberto Flammini, Sarah Campanile, Floriana tascini, Carlo |
author_sort | Giuliano, Simone |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Enterococcus faecalis is responsible for many serious infections for which combination bactericidal therapy is required(1). A synergism between amoxicillin and cefotaxime against E. faecalis through partial saturation of penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) 4 and 5 by amoxicillin and total saturation of PBPs 2 and 3 by cefotaxime has been demonstrated(2). Unlike cefotaxime, ceftobiprole binds with high affinity to PBP2, PBP3, PBP4 and PBP5(3,4,5), thus a potential role in the management of severe E. faecalis infections might be hypothesized. The availability of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for ampicillin and ceftobiprole has been driving the choice of using the combination of ampicillin plus ceftobiprole (ABPR) for the treatment of life-threatening E. faecalis infections. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical features (Table1), and trough ceftobiprole and ampicillin plasmatic concentrations of 21 patients admitted to our hospital from January to December 2020 for serious infection due to E. faecalis (61% infective endocarditis and 39% complicated bacteremia) who underwent ABPR treatment. Bacterial killing kinetics were also investigated in vitro for all strains. Bactericidal activity was defined as a ≥3 log10 decrease in bacterial count at 24 h. Synergy was measured at 24 h and was defined as a ≥ 2 log10 decrease in CFU/mL by the combination compared with its most active constituent and a ≥ 2 log10 decrease in the CFU/mL below the starting inocula. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] RESULTS: High clinical success rate of 81% and elevated microbiological eradication rate of 86% were reported. The ratios among all patients total plasmatic ampicillin and ceftobiprole concentrations and the corresponding MIC of enterococcal isolates far exceeded the PK/PD targets of maximized bactericidal activity (6) ( >4-5) (Figure 1). Ceftobiprole MIC(50) and MIC(90) were 0.5 mg/l and 1 mg/l, respectively. Time-kill curve for one of the 21 studied E. faecalis isolates is reported in Figure 2. Ceftobiprole showed such a potent bactericidal activity at concentration four times the MIC that a synergistic effect with ampicillin was even not demonstrable (Figure 2). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Ceftobiprole even alone or ABPR might represent a valuable option for the treatment of severe E. faecalis invasive infections. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10677992 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106779922023-11-27 1112. Ceftobiprole for the Treatment of Invasive Enterococcus faecalis Infections: Ampicillin, "Should I Stay or Should I Go?" Giuliano, Simone D’Elia, Denise Angelini, Jacopo Pagotto, Alberto Flammini, Sarah Campanile, Floriana tascini, Carlo Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Enterococcus faecalis is responsible for many serious infections for which combination bactericidal therapy is required(1). A synergism between amoxicillin and cefotaxime against E. faecalis through partial saturation of penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) 4 and 5 by amoxicillin and total saturation of PBPs 2 and 3 by cefotaxime has been demonstrated(2). Unlike cefotaxime, ceftobiprole binds with high affinity to PBP2, PBP3, PBP4 and PBP5(3,4,5), thus a potential role in the management of severe E. faecalis infections might be hypothesized. The availability of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for ampicillin and ceftobiprole has been driving the choice of using the combination of ampicillin plus ceftobiprole (ABPR) for the treatment of life-threatening E. faecalis infections. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical features (Table1), and trough ceftobiprole and ampicillin plasmatic concentrations of 21 patients admitted to our hospital from January to December 2020 for serious infection due to E. faecalis (61% infective endocarditis and 39% complicated bacteremia) who underwent ABPR treatment. Bacterial killing kinetics were also investigated in vitro for all strains. Bactericidal activity was defined as a ≥3 log10 decrease in bacterial count at 24 h. Synergy was measured at 24 h and was defined as a ≥ 2 log10 decrease in CFU/mL by the combination compared with its most active constituent and a ≥ 2 log10 decrease in the CFU/mL below the starting inocula. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] RESULTS: High clinical success rate of 81% and elevated microbiological eradication rate of 86% were reported. The ratios among all patients total plasmatic ampicillin and ceftobiprole concentrations and the corresponding MIC of enterococcal isolates far exceeded the PK/PD targets of maximized bactericidal activity (6) ( >4-5) (Figure 1). Ceftobiprole MIC(50) and MIC(90) were 0.5 mg/l and 1 mg/l, respectively. Time-kill curve for one of the 21 studied E. faecalis isolates is reported in Figure 2. Ceftobiprole showed such a potent bactericidal activity at concentration four times the MIC that a synergistic effect with ampicillin was even not demonstrable (Figure 2). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Ceftobiprole even alone or ABPR might represent a valuable option for the treatment of severe E. faecalis invasive infections. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10677992/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.085 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstract Giuliano, Simone D’Elia, Denise Angelini, Jacopo Pagotto, Alberto Flammini, Sarah Campanile, Floriana tascini, Carlo 1112. Ceftobiprole for the Treatment of Invasive Enterococcus faecalis Infections: Ampicillin, "Should I Stay or Should I Go?" |
title | 1112. Ceftobiprole for the Treatment of Invasive Enterococcus faecalis Infections: Ampicillin, "Should I Stay or Should I Go?" |
title_full | 1112. Ceftobiprole for the Treatment of Invasive Enterococcus faecalis Infections: Ampicillin, "Should I Stay or Should I Go?" |
title_fullStr | 1112. Ceftobiprole for the Treatment of Invasive Enterococcus faecalis Infections: Ampicillin, "Should I Stay or Should I Go?" |
title_full_unstemmed | 1112. Ceftobiprole for the Treatment of Invasive Enterococcus faecalis Infections: Ampicillin, "Should I Stay or Should I Go?" |
title_short | 1112. Ceftobiprole for the Treatment of Invasive Enterococcus faecalis Infections: Ampicillin, "Should I Stay or Should I Go?" |
title_sort | 1112. ceftobiprole for the treatment of invasive enterococcus faecalis infections: ampicillin, "should i stay or should i go?" |
topic | Abstract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10677992/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.085 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giulianosimone 1112ceftobiproleforthetreatmentofinvasiveenterococcusfaecalisinfectionsampicillinshouldistayorshouldigo AT deliadenise 1112ceftobiproleforthetreatmentofinvasiveenterococcusfaecalisinfectionsampicillinshouldistayorshouldigo AT angelinijacopo 1112ceftobiproleforthetreatmentofinvasiveenterococcusfaecalisinfectionsampicillinshouldistayorshouldigo AT pagottoalberto 1112ceftobiproleforthetreatmentofinvasiveenterococcusfaecalisinfectionsampicillinshouldistayorshouldigo AT flamminisarah 1112ceftobiproleforthetreatmentofinvasiveenterococcusfaecalisinfectionsampicillinshouldistayorshouldigo AT campanilefloriana 1112ceftobiproleforthetreatmentofinvasiveenterococcusfaecalisinfectionsampicillinshouldistayorshouldigo AT tascinicarlo 1112ceftobiproleforthetreatmentofinvasiveenterococcusfaecalisinfectionsampicillinshouldistayorshouldigo |