Cargando…

1432. Touch-Free Automatic Alcohol-Based Hand Rub Dispensers in Healthcare Settings: A Simulation Study of Dispenser Energy Impact on Hand Hygiene Disruption

BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene (HH) matters because it decreases pathogen transmission that can cause infection. Automatic alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) dispensers are widely adopted in healthcare facilities as the preferred means of HH. Traditional automatic dispensers have a large supply of batteries in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Nanshan, Arbogast, James W, McNulty, John J, Brown, Paul J, Henry, Demetrius, O’Hara, Susan, Al Kader, Abedallah, Hu, Angela, Allen, Theodore T, Xia, Cathy H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678069/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1269
_version_ 1785150278414106624
author Chen, Nanshan
Arbogast, James W
McNulty, John J
Brown, Paul J
Henry, Demetrius
O’Hara, Susan
Al Kader, Abedallah
Hu, Angela
Allen, Theodore T
Xia, Cathy H
author_facet Chen, Nanshan
Arbogast, James W
McNulty, John J
Brown, Paul J
Henry, Demetrius
O’Hara, Susan
Al Kader, Abedallah
Hu, Angela
Allen, Theodore T
Xia, Cathy H
author_sort Chen, Nanshan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene (HH) matters because it decreases pathogen transmission that can cause infection. Automatic alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) dispensers are widely adopted in healthcare facilities as the preferred means of HH. Traditional automatic dispensers have a large supply of batteries in the dispenser housing, whereas energy-on-the-refill (EOR) is a newer power supply solution, consisting of a relatively small battery attached to a refill bottle. The objective of this study was to assess dispenser design impact on missed HH opportunities and facility workflow disruption by mitigating battery maintenance. METHODS: We used date-driven discrete event simulation to evaluate the performance of three leading types of automatic dispensers in four common types of hospitals (Table 1). We analyzed up to 8 years of historical usage data and identified the usage pattern, which are used as the input traffic for our simulation model. Dispenser energy performance parameters were inputs to measure the workflow disruption of the different types of dispensers over a 6-year period in terms of battery replacements, duration of downtime, and the number of missed HH opportunities. [Figure: see text] 1. This total included soap dispensers used for hand washing and ABHR dispensers that were not equipped with automated monitoring (e.g., those provided in office areas without patients). 2. These were the dispensers used in the analysis and modeling results. 3. Total dispenses for all ABHR dispensers during the entire time range. 4. This is the average number of ABHR dispenses daily for the facility for all dispensers. RESULTS: The simulation results suggested that dispensers with EOR technology were free of battery failures over the entire 6 years, and thus 0 HH misses were incurred due to dead batteries (Figure 1). All other designs had a significant amount HH misses due to battery failures, ranging from 2,514 (± 547) to 40,522 (± 4,506) per facility. However, the majority of HH misses were caused by empty ABHR refills. The maximum number of battery change events was 802 (± 0.60). [Figure: see text] 1. Dispenser A is a traditional design with 4 “D” cell batteries in the housing and has an average dispense energy of 2.02 J/ml. Dispenser B is a traditional design with 3 “D” cell batteries in the housing and has an average dispense energy of 1.78 J/ml. Dispenser C is a new design with a “AA” battery on the refill and has an average dispense energy of 1.78 J/ml. Dispenser B is modeled at 1 dose and 2 doses because it has some ABHR formulations that can require 2 dispenses to meet the Healthcare Personnel Handwash test method antimicrobial efficacy success criteria. CONCLUSION: Differences in dispenser design, including the energy management system and usage profiles have significant impact on HH performance, which in turn can affect infection risk. By adopting the EOR system, facilities can effectively eliminate the need for battery maintenance, resulting in labor and workflow efficiencies. The EOR system significantly reduces HH disruptions and may decrease complaints by caregivers, patients and visitors. Importantly facilities should carefully study dispenser usage patterns to implement optimized policies and practices for placement and refill maintenance of ABHR dispensers to minimize overall missed HH opportunities. DISCLOSURES: Nanshan Chen, n/a, GOJO Industries, Inc.: Grant/Research Support James W. Arbogast, PhD, GOJO Industries, Inc.: employee John J. McNulty, n/a, GOJO Industries, Inc.: employee Paul J. Brown, n/a, GOJO Industries, Inc.: employee Demetrius Henry, n/a, GOJO Industries, Inc.: employee Susan O'Hara, PhD, GOJO Industries, Inc.: Grant/Research Support Abedallah Al Kader, n/a, GOJO Industries, Inc.: Grant/Research Support Angela Hu, n/a, GOJO Industries, Inc.: Grant/Research Support Theodore T. Allen, PhD, GOJO Industries, Inc.: Grant/Research Support Cathy H. Xia, PhD, GOJO Industries, Inc.: Grant/Research Support
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10678069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106780692023-11-27 1432. Touch-Free Automatic Alcohol-Based Hand Rub Dispensers in Healthcare Settings: A Simulation Study of Dispenser Energy Impact on Hand Hygiene Disruption Chen, Nanshan Arbogast, James W McNulty, John J Brown, Paul J Henry, Demetrius O’Hara, Susan Al Kader, Abedallah Hu, Angela Allen, Theodore T Xia, Cathy H Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene (HH) matters because it decreases pathogen transmission that can cause infection. Automatic alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) dispensers are widely adopted in healthcare facilities as the preferred means of HH. Traditional automatic dispensers have a large supply of batteries in the dispenser housing, whereas energy-on-the-refill (EOR) is a newer power supply solution, consisting of a relatively small battery attached to a refill bottle. The objective of this study was to assess dispenser design impact on missed HH opportunities and facility workflow disruption by mitigating battery maintenance. METHODS: We used date-driven discrete event simulation to evaluate the performance of three leading types of automatic dispensers in four common types of hospitals (Table 1). We analyzed up to 8 years of historical usage data and identified the usage pattern, which are used as the input traffic for our simulation model. Dispenser energy performance parameters were inputs to measure the workflow disruption of the different types of dispensers over a 6-year period in terms of battery replacements, duration of downtime, and the number of missed HH opportunities. [Figure: see text] 1. This total included soap dispensers used for hand washing and ABHR dispensers that were not equipped with automated monitoring (e.g., those provided in office areas without patients). 2. These were the dispensers used in the analysis and modeling results. 3. Total dispenses for all ABHR dispensers during the entire time range. 4. This is the average number of ABHR dispenses daily for the facility for all dispensers. RESULTS: The simulation results suggested that dispensers with EOR technology were free of battery failures over the entire 6 years, and thus 0 HH misses were incurred due to dead batteries (Figure 1). All other designs had a significant amount HH misses due to battery failures, ranging from 2,514 (± 547) to 40,522 (± 4,506) per facility. However, the majority of HH misses were caused by empty ABHR refills. The maximum number of battery change events was 802 (± 0.60). [Figure: see text] 1. Dispenser A is a traditional design with 4 “D” cell batteries in the housing and has an average dispense energy of 2.02 J/ml. Dispenser B is a traditional design with 3 “D” cell batteries in the housing and has an average dispense energy of 1.78 J/ml. Dispenser C is a new design with a “AA” battery on the refill and has an average dispense energy of 1.78 J/ml. Dispenser B is modeled at 1 dose and 2 doses because it has some ABHR formulations that can require 2 dispenses to meet the Healthcare Personnel Handwash test method antimicrobial efficacy success criteria. CONCLUSION: Differences in dispenser design, including the energy management system and usage profiles have significant impact on HH performance, which in turn can affect infection risk. By adopting the EOR system, facilities can effectively eliminate the need for battery maintenance, resulting in labor and workflow efficiencies. The EOR system significantly reduces HH disruptions and may decrease complaints by caregivers, patients and visitors. Importantly facilities should carefully study dispenser usage patterns to implement optimized policies and practices for placement and refill maintenance of ABHR dispensers to minimize overall missed HH opportunities. DISCLOSURES: Nanshan Chen, n/a, GOJO Industries, Inc.: Grant/Research Support James W. Arbogast, PhD, GOJO Industries, Inc.: employee John J. McNulty, n/a, GOJO Industries, Inc.: employee Paul J. Brown, n/a, GOJO Industries, Inc.: employee Demetrius Henry, n/a, GOJO Industries, Inc.: employee Susan O'Hara, PhD, GOJO Industries, Inc.: Grant/Research Support Abedallah Al Kader, n/a, GOJO Industries, Inc.: Grant/Research Support Angela Hu, n/a, GOJO Industries, Inc.: Grant/Research Support Theodore T. Allen, PhD, GOJO Industries, Inc.: Grant/Research Support Cathy H. Xia, PhD, GOJO Industries, Inc.: Grant/Research Support Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10678069/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1269 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Chen, Nanshan
Arbogast, James W
McNulty, John J
Brown, Paul J
Henry, Demetrius
O’Hara, Susan
Al Kader, Abedallah
Hu, Angela
Allen, Theodore T
Xia, Cathy H
1432. Touch-Free Automatic Alcohol-Based Hand Rub Dispensers in Healthcare Settings: A Simulation Study of Dispenser Energy Impact on Hand Hygiene Disruption
title 1432. Touch-Free Automatic Alcohol-Based Hand Rub Dispensers in Healthcare Settings: A Simulation Study of Dispenser Energy Impact on Hand Hygiene Disruption
title_full 1432. Touch-Free Automatic Alcohol-Based Hand Rub Dispensers in Healthcare Settings: A Simulation Study of Dispenser Energy Impact on Hand Hygiene Disruption
title_fullStr 1432. Touch-Free Automatic Alcohol-Based Hand Rub Dispensers in Healthcare Settings: A Simulation Study of Dispenser Energy Impact on Hand Hygiene Disruption
title_full_unstemmed 1432. Touch-Free Automatic Alcohol-Based Hand Rub Dispensers in Healthcare Settings: A Simulation Study of Dispenser Energy Impact on Hand Hygiene Disruption
title_short 1432. Touch-Free Automatic Alcohol-Based Hand Rub Dispensers in Healthcare Settings: A Simulation Study of Dispenser Energy Impact on Hand Hygiene Disruption
title_sort 1432. touch-free automatic alcohol-based hand rub dispensers in healthcare settings: a simulation study of dispenser energy impact on hand hygiene disruption
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678069/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1269
work_keys_str_mv AT chennanshan 1432touchfreeautomaticalcoholbasedhandrubdispensersinhealthcaresettingsasimulationstudyofdispenserenergyimpactonhandhygienedisruption
AT arbogastjamesw 1432touchfreeautomaticalcoholbasedhandrubdispensersinhealthcaresettingsasimulationstudyofdispenserenergyimpactonhandhygienedisruption
AT mcnultyjohnj 1432touchfreeautomaticalcoholbasedhandrubdispensersinhealthcaresettingsasimulationstudyofdispenserenergyimpactonhandhygienedisruption
AT brownpaulj 1432touchfreeautomaticalcoholbasedhandrubdispensersinhealthcaresettingsasimulationstudyofdispenserenergyimpactonhandhygienedisruption
AT henrydemetrius 1432touchfreeautomaticalcoholbasedhandrubdispensersinhealthcaresettingsasimulationstudyofdispenserenergyimpactonhandhygienedisruption
AT oharasusan 1432touchfreeautomaticalcoholbasedhandrubdispensersinhealthcaresettingsasimulationstudyofdispenserenergyimpactonhandhygienedisruption
AT alkaderabedallah 1432touchfreeautomaticalcoholbasedhandrubdispensersinhealthcaresettingsasimulationstudyofdispenserenergyimpactonhandhygienedisruption
AT huangela 1432touchfreeautomaticalcoholbasedhandrubdispensersinhealthcaresettingsasimulationstudyofdispenserenergyimpactonhandhygienedisruption
AT allentheodoret 1432touchfreeautomaticalcoholbasedhandrubdispensersinhealthcaresettingsasimulationstudyofdispenserenergyimpactonhandhygienedisruption
AT xiacathyh 1432touchfreeautomaticalcoholbasedhandrubdispensersinhealthcaresettingsasimulationstudyofdispenserenergyimpactonhandhygienedisruption