Cargando…

2311. Predictive cut-off values for anti-N and anti-S antibodies for COVID-19 risk identification

BACKGROUND: The role of anti-N and anti-S antibody tests as a monitoring strategy for identifying patients at risk of developing COVID-19 is not clearly elucidated. Our study explored in a cohort of hospital workers whether the positivity of these antibodies linked to infection and/or vaccination wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rebellón Sánchez, David E, Llanos-Torres, Julio, Tafurt, Eric, Rosso, Fernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678072/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1933
_version_ 1785150279094632448
author Rebellón Sánchez, David E
Llanos-Torres, Julio
Tafurt, Eric
Rosso, Fernando
author_facet Rebellón Sánchez, David E
Llanos-Torres, Julio
Tafurt, Eric
Rosso, Fernando
author_sort Rebellón Sánchez, David E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The role of anti-N and anti-S antibody tests as a monitoring strategy for identifying patients at risk of developing COVID-19 is not clearly elucidated. Our study explored in a cohort of hospital workers whether the positivity of these antibodies linked to infection and/or vaccination was associated with a decrease in the risk of infections and sought to estimate a predictive cut-off point for the development of COVID-19 in the first 6 months of measurement. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted among hospital workers at a university hospital in Cali, Colombia. Measurements of COVID-19 antibodies were taken before the onset of the third, fourth, and fifth waves of COVID-19 cases. Anti-N and Anti-S total antibodies were measured using Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassay (Roche). RESULTS: We include 480 participants, 71.8% females and median age of 32 years (IQR: 27-39); 60.62% were healthcare workers involved in the care of COVID-19 patients. It was found that having a history of COVID-19 (aRR 0.49 (95% CI 0.34-0.70)), being vaccinated in the last 6 months (aRR 0.13 (95% CI 0.07-0.24)), having positive anti-N antibodies in the last 3 months (aRR 0.62 (95% CI 0.44-0.87)), and having positive anti-S antibodies in the last 3 months (aRR 0.55 (95% CI 0.31-0.97)) were associated with a lower risk of developing COVID-19. A cutoff point ≤ 150 COI for anti-N levels and ≤1,900 BAU/mL for anti-S levels was found to have a better predictive performance. The chosen cutoff point for anti-N achieved a sensitivity of 98.2%, with a specificity of 12.4%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.5%, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 10.2%, with an AUC of 0.55 for predicting COVID-19 in the next 6 months. Having anti-S antibodies ≤ 1900 BAU/mL was found to have a sensitivity of 58.1%, specificity of 55.5%, NPV of 85.3%, PPV of 22.9%, and an AUC of 0.63. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that having a positive anti-N or anti-S antibodies result may be associated with a lower risk of developing COVID-19. We also identified predictive cut-off points for anti-N and anti-S antibody levels that may be useful in identifying individuals at a higher risk of developing COVID-19 in the next 6 months. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine their generalizability to other populations. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10678072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106780722023-11-27 2311. Predictive cut-off values for anti-N and anti-S antibodies for COVID-19 risk identification Rebellón Sánchez, David E Llanos-Torres, Julio Tafurt, Eric Rosso, Fernando Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: The role of anti-N and anti-S antibody tests as a monitoring strategy for identifying patients at risk of developing COVID-19 is not clearly elucidated. Our study explored in a cohort of hospital workers whether the positivity of these antibodies linked to infection and/or vaccination was associated with a decrease in the risk of infections and sought to estimate a predictive cut-off point for the development of COVID-19 in the first 6 months of measurement. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted among hospital workers at a university hospital in Cali, Colombia. Measurements of COVID-19 antibodies were taken before the onset of the third, fourth, and fifth waves of COVID-19 cases. Anti-N and Anti-S total antibodies were measured using Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassay (Roche). RESULTS: We include 480 participants, 71.8% females and median age of 32 years (IQR: 27-39); 60.62% were healthcare workers involved in the care of COVID-19 patients. It was found that having a history of COVID-19 (aRR 0.49 (95% CI 0.34-0.70)), being vaccinated in the last 6 months (aRR 0.13 (95% CI 0.07-0.24)), having positive anti-N antibodies in the last 3 months (aRR 0.62 (95% CI 0.44-0.87)), and having positive anti-S antibodies in the last 3 months (aRR 0.55 (95% CI 0.31-0.97)) were associated with a lower risk of developing COVID-19. A cutoff point ≤ 150 COI for anti-N levels and ≤1,900 BAU/mL for anti-S levels was found to have a better predictive performance. The chosen cutoff point for anti-N achieved a sensitivity of 98.2%, with a specificity of 12.4%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.5%, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 10.2%, with an AUC of 0.55 for predicting COVID-19 in the next 6 months. Having anti-S antibodies ≤ 1900 BAU/mL was found to have a sensitivity of 58.1%, specificity of 55.5%, NPV of 85.3%, PPV of 22.9%, and an AUC of 0.63. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that having a positive anti-N or anti-S antibodies result may be associated with a lower risk of developing COVID-19. We also identified predictive cut-off points for anti-N and anti-S antibody levels that may be useful in identifying individuals at a higher risk of developing COVID-19 in the next 6 months. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine their generalizability to other populations. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10678072/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1933 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Rebellón Sánchez, David E
Llanos-Torres, Julio
Tafurt, Eric
Rosso, Fernando
2311. Predictive cut-off values for anti-N and anti-S antibodies for COVID-19 risk identification
title 2311. Predictive cut-off values for anti-N and anti-S antibodies for COVID-19 risk identification
title_full 2311. Predictive cut-off values for anti-N and anti-S antibodies for COVID-19 risk identification
title_fullStr 2311. Predictive cut-off values for anti-N and anti-S antibodies for COVID-19 risk identification
title_full_unstemmed 2311. Predictive cut-off values for anti-N and anti-S antibodies for COVID-19 risk identification
title_short 2311. Predictive cut-off values for anti-N and anti-S antibodies for COVID-19 risk identification
title_sort 2311. predictive cut-off values for anti-n and anti-s antibodies for covid-19 risk identification
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678072/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1933
work_keys_str_mv AT rebellonsanchezdavide 2311predictivecutoffvaluesforantinandantisantibodiesforcovid19riskidentification
AT llanostorresjulio 2311predictivecutoffvaluesforantinandantisantibodiesforcovid19riskidentification
AT tafurteric 2311predictivecutoffvaluesforantinandantisantibodiesforcovid19riskidentification
AT rossofernando 2311predictivecutoffvaluesforantinandantisantibodiesforcovid19riskidentification