Cargando…
2311. Predictive cut-off values for anti-N and anti-S antibodies for COVID-19 risk identification
BACKGROUND: The role of anti-N and anti-S antibody tests as a monitoring strategy for identifying patients at risk of developing COVID-19 is not clearly elucidated. Our study explored in a cohort of hospital workers whether the positivity of these antibodies linked to infection and/or vaccination wa...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678072/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1933 |
_version_ | 1785150279094632448 |
---|---|
author | Rebellón Sánchez, David E Llanos-Torres, Julio Tafurt, Eric Rosso, Fernando |
author_facet | Rebellón Sánchez, David E Llanos-Torres, Julio Tafurt, Eric Rosso, Fernando |
author_sort | Rebellón Sánchez, David E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The role of anti-N and anti-S antibody tests as a monitoring strategy for identifying patients at risk of developing COVID-19 is not clearly elucidated. Our study explored in a cohort of hospital workers whether the positivity of these antibodies linked to infection and/or vaccination was associated with a decrease in the risk of infections and sought to estimate a predictive cut-off point for the development of COVID-19 in the first 6 months of measurement. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted among hospital workers at a university hospital in Cali, Colombia. Measurements of COVID-19 antibodies were taken before the onset of the third, fourth, and fifth waves of COVID-19 cases. Anti-N and Anti-S total antibodies were measured using Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassay (Roche). RESULTS: We include 480 participants, 71.8% females and median age of 32 years (IQR: 27-39); 60.62% were healthcare workers involved in the care of COVID-19 patients. It was found that having a history of COVID-19 (aRR 0.49 (95% CI 0.34-0.70)), being vaccinated in the last 6 months (aRR 0.13 (95% CI 0.07-0.24)), having positive anti-N antibodies in the last 3 months (aRR 0.62 (95% CI 0.44-0.87)), and having positive anti-S antibodies in the last 3 months (aRR 0.55 (95% CI 0.31-0.97)) were associated with a lower risk of developing COVID-19. A cutoff point ≤ 150 COI for anti-N levels and ≤1,900 BAU/mL for anti-S levels was found to have a better predictive performance. The chosen cutoff point for anti-N achieved a sensitivity of 98.2%, with a specificity of 12.4%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.5%, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 10.2%, with an AUC of 0.55 for predicting COVID-19 in the next 6 months. Having anti-S antibodies ≤ 1900 BAU/mL was found to have a sensitivity of 58.1%, specificity of 55.5%, NPV of 85.3%, PPV of 22.9%, and an AUC of 0.63. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that having a positive anti-N or anti-S antibodies result may be associated with a lower risk of developing COVID-19. We also identified predictive cut-off points for anti-N and anti-S antibody levels that may be useful in identifying individuals at a higher risk of developing COVID-19 in the next 6 months. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine their generalizability to other populations. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10678072 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106780722023-11-27 2311. Predictive cut-off values for anti-N and anti-S antibodies for COVID-19 risk identification Rebellón Sánchez, David E Llanos-Torres, Julio Tafurt, Eric Rosso, Fernando Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: The role of anti-N and anti-S antibody tests as a monitoring strategy for identifying patients at risk of developing COVID-19 is not clearly elucidated. Our study explored in a cohort of hospital workers whether the positivity of these antibodies linked to infection and/or vaccination was associated with a decrease in the risk of infections and sought to estimate a predictive cut-off point for the development of COVID-19 in the first 6 months of measurement. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted among hospital workers at a university hospital in Cali, Colombia. Measurements of COVID-19 antibodies were taken before the onset of the third, fourth, and fifth waves of COVID-19 cases. Anti-N and Anti-S total antibodies were measured using Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassay (Roche). RESULTS: We include 480 participants, 71.8% females and median age of 32 years (IQR: 27-39); 60.62% were healthcare workers involved in the care of COVID-19 patients. It was found that having a history of COVID-19 (aRR 0.49 (95% CI 0.34-0.70)), being vaccinated in the last 6 months (aRR 0.13 (95% CI 0.07-0.24)), having positive anti-N antibodies in the last 3 months (aRR 0.62 (95% CI 0.44-0.87)), and having positive anti-S antibodies in the last 3 months (aRR 0.55 (95% CI 0.31-0.97)) were associated with a lower risk of developing COVID-19. A cutoff point ≤ 150 COI for anti-N levels and ≤1,900 BAU/mL for anti-S levels was found to have a better predictive performance. The chosen cutoff point for anti-N achieved a sensitivity of 98.2%, with a specificity of 12.4%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.5%, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 10.2%, with an AUC of 0.55 for predicting COVID-19 in the next 6 months. Having anti-S antibodies ≤ 1900 BAU/mL was found to have a sensitivity of 58.1%, specificity of 55.5%, NPV of 85.3%, PPV of 22.9%, and an AUC of 0.63. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that having a positive anti-N or anti-S antibodies result may be associated with a lower risk of developing COVID-19. We also identified predictive cut-off points for anti-N and anti-S antibody levels that may be useful in identifying individuals at a higher risk of developing COVID-19 in the next 6 months. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine their generalizability to other populations. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10678072/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1933 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstract Rebellón Sánchez, David E Llanos-Torres, Julio Tafurt, Eric Rosso, Fernando 2311. Predictive cut-off values for anti-N and anti-S antibodies for COVID-19 risk identification |
title | 2311. Predictive cut-off values for anti-N and anti-S antibodies for COVID-19 risk identification |
title_full | 2311. Predictive cut-off values for anti-N and anti-S antibodies for COVID-19 risk identification |
title_fullStr | 2311. Predictive cut-off values for anti-N and anti-S antibodies for COVID-19 risk identification |
title_full_unstemmed | 2311. Predictive cut-off values for anti-N and anti-S antibodies for COVID-19 risk identification |
title_short | 2311. Predictive cut-off values for anti-N and anti-S antibodies for COVID-19 risk identification |
title_sort | 2311. predictive cut-off values for anti-n and anti-s antibodies for covid-19 risk identification |
topic | Abstract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678072/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1933 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rebellonsanchezdavide 2311predictivecutoffvaluesforantinandantisantibodiesforcovid19riskidentification AT llanostorresjulio 2311predictivecutoffvaluesforantinandantisantibodiesforcovid19riskidentification AT tafurteric 2311predictivecutoffvaluesforantinandantisantibodiesforcovid19riskidentification AT rossofernando 2311predictivecutoffvaluesforantinandantisantibodiesforcovid19riskidentification |