Cargando…

1999. Assessment of Communication Strategies 1 to 2 Years After Completion of a Vaccine Hesitancy Communication Training Program During Residency

BACKGROUND: We previously showed (J Pediatr 2022;241:203; Open Forum Infect Dis 2022;9(2):ofac492.626) that residents trained in a structured communication strategy called AIMS (Announce, Inquire, Mirror, Secure) demonstrated specific behaviors of interest during live and virtual encounters with sta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barton, Shanna M, Calhoun, Aaron W, Feygin, Yana, Marshall, Gary S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678078/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.126
_version_ 1785150280451489792
author Barton, Shanna M
Calhoun, Aaron W
Feygin, Yana
Marshall, Gary S
author_facet Barton, Shanna M
Calhoun, Aaron W
Feygin, Yana
Marshall, Gary S
author_sort Barton, Shanna M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We previously showed (J Pediatr 2022;241:203; Open Forum Infect Dis 2022;9(2):ofac492.626) that residents trained in a structured communication strategy called AIMS (Announce, Inquire, Mirror, Secure) demonstrated specific behaviors of interest during live and virtual encounters with standardized patients (SPs) portraying vaccine-hesitant parents. The current study was conducted to determine if those behaviors were prioritized long after completion of training. METHODS: In the original studies, blinded Pediatrics and Medicine-Pediatrics residents were randomized to AIMS training (AIMS Group) or standard of care training (Control Group; Figure 1); blinding was maintained after training and until the time of the current study. Subjects were invited to complete an online survey wherein 10 possible communication behaviors were ranked from highest priority to lowest priority (Figure 2). Respondents were considered to have prioritized AIMS behaviors if they ranked each of the 3 AIMS items in the top 5; the ability of this measure to detect prioritization of AIMS behaviors was assessed by surveying unblinded residents who underwent AIMS training in the prior 2 weeks (Validation Group). Differences between groups were assessed using Chi-square tests for proportions. We hypothesized that a higher proportion of subjects in the AIMS Group would prioritize AIMS behaviors compared to subjects in the Control Group. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] RESULTS: Characteristics of study participants are shown in Figure 3. Seventy-seven percent of the 31 residents in the Validation Group met criteria for prioritization of AIMS behaviors, compared with only 38% of the 32 subjects in the Control Group (p-value = 0.003). However, only 19% of the 32 residents in the AIMS Group met criteria for prioritization of AIMS behaviors (p-value = 0.164, AIMS Group vs Control Group). [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: AIMS communication behaviors are ranked highly shortly after training, but this prioritization is not retained over time. Future studies of the utility of structured vaccine hesitancy communication strategies should incorporate repetition and spaced retrieval to enhance retention and ensure deployment in practice. DISCLOSURES: Shanna M. Barton, MD, M.Sc., Sanofi Pasteur: Grant/Research Support Gary S. Marshall, MD, GSK: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Honoraria|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Honoraria|Moderna: Advisor/Consultant|Moderna: Grant/Research Support|Moderna: Honoraria|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Honoraria|Sanofi: Advisor/Consultant|Sanofi: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi: Honoraria|Seqirus: Advisor/Consultant|Seqirus: Grant/Research Support|Seqirus: Honoraria
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10678078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106780782023-11-27 1999. Assessment of Communication Strategies 1 to 2 Years After Completion of a Vaccine Hesitancy Communication Training Program During Residency Barton, Shanna M Calhoun, Aaron W Feygin, Yana Marshall, Gary S Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: We previously showed (J Pediatr 2022;241:203; Open Forum Infect Dis 2022;9(2):ofac492.626) that residents trained in a structured communication strategy called AIMS (Announce, Inquire, Mirror, Secure) demonstrated specific behaviors of interest during live and virtual encounters with standardized patients (SPs) portraying vaccine-hesitant parents. The current study was conducted to determine if those behaviors were prioritized long after completion of training. METHODS: In the original studies, blinded Pediatrics and Medicine-Pediatrics residents were randomized to AIMS training (AIMS Group) or standard of care training (Control Group; Figure 1); blinding was maintained after training and until the time of the current study. Subjects were invited to complete an online survey wherein 10 possible communication behaviors were ranked from highest priority to lowest priority (Figure 2). Respondents were considered to have prioritized AIMS behaviors if they ranked each of the 3 AIMS items in the top 5; the ability of this measure to detect prioritization of AIMS behaviors was assessed by surveying unblinded residents who underwent AIMS training in the prior 2 weeks (Validation Group). Differences between groups were assessed using Chi-square tests for proportions. We hypothesized that a higher proportion of subjects in the AIMS Group would prioritize AIMS behaviors compared to subjects in the Control Group. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] RESULTS: Characteristics of study participants are shown in Figure 3. Seventy-seven percent of the 31 residents in the Validation Group met criteria for prioritization of AIMS behaviors, compared with only 38% of the 32 subjects in the Control Group (p-value = 0.003). However, only 19% of the 32 residents in the AIMS Group met criteria for prioritization of AIMS behaviors (p-value = 0.164, AIMS Group vs Control Group). [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: AIMS communication behaviors are ranked highly shortly after training, but this prioritization is not retained over time. Future studies of the utility of structured vaccine hesitancy communication strategies should incorporate repetition and spaced retrieval to enhance retention and ensure deployment in practice. DISCLOSURES: Shanna M. Barton, MD, M.Sc., Sanofi Pasteur: Grant/Research Support Gary S. Marshall, MD, GSK: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Honoraria|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Honoraria|Moderna: Advisor/Consultant|Moderna: Grant/Research Support|Moderna: Honoraria|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Honoraria|Sanofi: Advisor/Consultant|Sanofi: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi: Honoraria|Seqirus: Advisor/Consultant|Seqirus: Grant/Research Support|Seqirus: Honoraria Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10678078/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.126 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Barton, Shanna M
Calhoun, Aaron W
Feygin, Yana
Marshall, Gary S
1999. Assessment of Communication Strategies 1 to 2 Years After Completion of a Vaccine Hesitancy Communication Training Program During Residency
title 1999. Assessment of Communication Strategies 1 to 2 Years After Completion of a Vaccine Hesitancy Communication Training Program During Residency
title_full 1999. Assessment of Communication Strategies 1 to 2 Years After Completion of a Vaccine Hesitancy Communication Training Program During Residency
title_fullStr 1999. Assessment of Communication Strategies 1 to 2 Years After Completion of a Vaccine Hesitancy Communication Training Program During Residency
title_full_unstemmed 1999. Assessment of Communication Strategies 1 to 2 Years After Completion of a Vaccine Hesitancy Communication Training Program During Residency
title_short 1999. Assessment of Communication Strategies 1 to 2 Years After Completion of a Vaccine Hesitancy Communication Training Program During Residency
title_sort 1999. assessment of communication strategies 1 to 2 years after completion of a vaccine hesitancy communication training program during residency
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678078/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.126
work_keys_str_mv AT bartonshannam 1999assessmentofcommunicationstrategies1to2yearsaftercompletionofavaccinehesitancycommunicationtrainingprogramduringresidency
AT calhounaaronw 1999assessmentofcommunicationstrategies1to2yearsaftercompletionofavaccinehesitancycommunicationtrainingprogramduringresidency
AT feyginyana 1999assessmentofcommunicationstrategies1to2yearsaftercompletionofavaccinehesitancycommunicationtrainingprogramduringresidency
AT marshallgarys 1999assessmentofcommunicationstrategies1to2yearsaftercompletionofavaccinehesitancycommunicationtrainingprogramduringresidency