Cargando…
1999. Assessment of Communication Strategies 1 to 2 Years After Completion of a Vaccine Hesitancy Communication Training Program During Residency
BACKGROUND: We previously showed (J Pediatr 2022;241:203; Open Forum Infect Dis 2022;9(2):ofac492.626) that residents trained in a structured communication strategy called AIMS (Announce, Inquire, Mirror, Secure) demonstrated specific behaviors of interest during live and virtual encounters with sta...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678078/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.126 |
_version_ | 1785150280451489792 |
---|---|
author | Barton, Shanna M Calhoun, Aaron W Feygin, Yana Marshall, Gary S |
author_facet | Barton, Shanna M Calhoun, Aaron W Feygin, Yana Marshall, Gary S |
author_sort | Barton, Shanna M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We previously showed (J Pediatr 2022;241:203; Open Forum Infect Dis 2022;9(2):ofac492.626) that residents trained in a structured communication strategy called AIMS (Announce, Inquire, Mirror, Secure) demonstrated specific behaviors of interest during live and virtual encounters with standardized patients (SPs) portraying vaccine-hesitant parents. The current study was conducted to determine if those behaviors were prioritized long after completion of training. METHODS: In the original studies, blinded Pediatrics and Medicine-Pediatrics residents were randomized to AIMS training (AIMS Group) or standard of care training (Control Group; Figure 1); blinding was maintained after training and until the time of the current study. Subjects were invited to complete an online survey wherein 10 possible communication behaviors were ranked from highest priority to lowest priority (Figure 2). Respondents were considered to have prioritized AIMS behaviors if they ranked each of the 3 AIMS items in the top 5; the ability of this measure to detect prioritization of AIMS behaviors was assessed by surveying unblinded residents who underwent AIMS training in the prior 2 weeks (Validation Group). Differences between groups were assessed using Chi-square tests for proportions. We hypothesized that a higher proportion of subjects in the AIMS Group would prioritize AIMS behaviors compared to subjects in the Control Group. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] RESULTS: Characteristics of study participants are shown in Figure 3. Seventy-seven percent of the 31 residents in the Validation Group met criteria for prioritization of AIMS behaviors, compared with only 38% of the 32 subjects in the Control Group (p-value = 0.003). However, only 19% of the 32 residents in the AIMS Group met criteria for prioritization of AIMS behaviors (p-value = 0.164, AIMS Group vs Control Group). [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: AIMS communication behaviors are ranked highly shortly after training, but this prioritization is not retained over time. Future studies of the utility of structured vaccine hesitancy communication strategies should incorporate repetition and spaced retrieval to enhance retention and ensure deployment in practice. DISCLOSURES: Shanna M. Barton, MD, M.Sc., Sanofi Pasteur: Grant/Research Support Gary S. Marshall, MD, GSK: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Honoraria|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Honoraria|Moderna: Advisor/Consultant|Moderna: Grant/Research Support|Moderna: Honoraria|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Honoraria|Sanofi: Advisor/Consultant|Sanofi: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi: Honoraria|Seqirus: Advisor/Consultant|Seqirus: Grant/Research Support|Seqirus: Honoraria |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10678078 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106780782023-11-27 1999. Assessment of Communication Strategies 1 to 2 Years After Completion of a Vaccine Hesitancy Communication Training Program During Residency Barton, Shanna M Calhoun, Aaron W Feygin, Yana Marshall, Gary S Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: We previously showed (J Pediatr 2022;241:203; Open Forum Infect Dis 2022;9(2):ofac492.626) that residents trained in a structured communication strategy called AIMS (Announce, Inquire, Mirror, Secure) demonstrated specific behaviors of interest during live and virtual encounters with standardized patients (SPs) portraying vaccine-hesitant parents. The current study was conducted to determine if those behaviors were prioritized long after completion of training. METHODS: In the original studies, blinded Pediatrics and Medicine-Pediatrics residents were randomized to AIMS training (AIMS Group) or standard of care training (Control Group; Figure 1); blinding was maintained after training and until the time of the current study. Subjects were invited to complete an online survey wherein 10 possible communication behaviors were ranked from highest priority to lowest priority (Figure 2). Respondents were considered to have prioritized AIMS behaviors if they ranked each of the 3 AIMS items in the top 5; the ability of this measure to detect prioritization of AIMS behaviors was assessed by surveying unblinded residents who underwent AIMS training in the prior 2 weeks (Validation Group). Differences between groups were assessed using Chi-square tests for proportions. We hypothesized that a higher proportion of subjects in the AIMS Group would prioritize AIMS behaviors compared to subjects in the Control Group. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] RESULTS: Characteristics of study participants are shown in Figure 3. Seventy-seven percent of the 31 residents in the Validation Group met criteria for prioritization of AIMS behaviors, compared with only 38% of the 32 subjects in the Control Group (p-value = 0.003). However, only 19% of the 32 residents in the AIMS Group met criteria for prioritization of AIMS behaviors (p-value = 0.164, AIMS Group vs Control Group). [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: AIMS communication behaviors are ranked highly shortly after training, but this prioritization is not retained over time. Future studies of the utility of structured vaccine hesitancy communication strategies should incorporate repetition and spaced retrieval to enhance retention and ensure deployment in practice. DISCLOSURES: Shanna M. Barton, MD, M.Sc., Sanofi Pasteur: Grant/Research Support Gary S. Marshall, MD, GSK: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Honoraria|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Honoraria|Moderna: Advisor/Consultant|Moderna: Grant/Research Support|Moderna: Honoraria|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Honoraria|Sanofi: Advisor/Consultant|Sanofi: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi: Honoraria|Seqirus: Advisor/Consultant|Seqirus: Grant/Research Support|Seqirus: Honoraria Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10678078/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.126 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstract Barton, Shanna M Calhoun, Aaron W Feygin, Yana Marshall, Gary S 1999. Assessment of Communication Strategies 1 to 2 Years After Completion of a Vaccine Hesitancy Communication Training Program During Residency |
title | 1999. Assessment of Communication Strategies 1 to 2 Years After Completion of a Vaccine Hesitancy Communication Training Program During Residency |
title_full | 1999. Assessment of Communication Strategies 1 to 2 Years After Completion of a Vaccine Hesitancy Communication Training Program During Residency |
title_fullStr | 1999. Assessment of Communication Strategies 1 to 2 Years After Completion of a Vaccine Hesitancy Communication Training Program During Residency |
title_full_unstemmed | 1999. Assessment of Communication Strategies 1 to 2 Years After Completion of a Vaccine Hesitancy Communication Training Program During Residency |
title_short | 1999. Assessment of Communication Strategies 1 to 2 Years After Completion of a Vaccine Hesitancy Communication Training Program During Residency |
title_sort | 1999. assessment of communication strategies 1 to 2 years after completion of a vaccine hesitancy communication training program during residency |
topic | Abstract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678078/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.126 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bartonshannam 1999assessmentofcommunicationstrategies1to2yearsaftercompletionofavaccinehesitancycommunicationtrainingprogramduringresidency AT calhounaaronw 1999assessmentofcommunicationstrategies1to2yearsaftercompletionofavaccinehesitancycommunicationtrainingprogramduringresidency AT feyginyana 1999assessmentofcommunicationstrategies1to2yearsaftercompletionofavaccinehesitancycommunicationtrainingprogramduringresidency AT marshallgarys 1999assessmentofcommunicationstrategies1to2yearsaftercompletionofavaccinehesitancycommunicationtrainingprogramduringresidency |