Cargando…

2884. Incidence of Invasive Fungal Infections After Pancreas Transplantation

BACKGROUND: There is scarce data surrounding the epidemiology of invasive fungal infections (IFI) after pancreas transplantation (PT). Our centers’ PT protocols recommend universal fluconazole prophylaxis for at least 1 month, which is extended to 1 year for recipients who live in Coccidioides endem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nair, Vaisak, Yetmar, Zachary A, Seville, Maria T, Bosch, Wendelyn, Beam, Elena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678197/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.161
_version_ 1785150305517699072
author Nair, Vaisak
Yetmar, Zachary A
Seville, Maria T
Bosch, Wendelyn
Beam, Elena
author_facet Nair, Vaisak
Yetmar, Zachary A
Seville, Maria T
Bosch, Wendelyn
Beam, Elena
author_sort Nair, Vaisak
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is scarce data surrounding the epidemiology of invasive fungal infections (IFI) after pancreas transplantation (PT). Our centers’ PT protocols recommend universal fluconazole prophylaxis for at least 1 month, which is extended to 1 year for recipients who live in Coccidioides endemic areas. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the epidemiology of IFIs after PT while on our antifungal prophylaxis protocol. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed among adult patients who underwent PT at Mayo Clinic sites in Arizona, Florida, or Minnesota between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2020. IFI was defined based on EORTC/MSGERC criteria. The primary aim was to describe epidemiology and timing of IFI after PT, particularly in the context of the universal antifungal prophylaxis protocol. RESULTS: Among 482 pancreas transplant recipients, 35 developed IFIs (7.3%). All patients received antifungal prophylaxis per protocol for a median duration of 33 days (Figure 1). Median duration from time of transplant to IFI was 16 (IQR 10.5-28.2) days for Candida IFIs versus 529 (IQR 192.5-1195.0) days for non-Candida IFI. 20 IFIs (57.1%) were secondary to Candida species with 45% of these cases caused by either C. glabrata or C. krusei (Figure 2). 90% were on antifungal prophylaxis (85% fluconazole) at time of diagnosis of invasive candidiasis. All the Candida IFIs were intra-abdominal infections. Amongst the 15 non-Candida IFIs (42.9%), 9 were secondary to endemic mycoses and 4 were secondary to invasive molds. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Our study shows a high incidence of IFIs secondary to Candida, with few patients diagnosed with non-Candida IFIs (Figure 3). Non-Candida IFIs, mostly secondary to endemic mycoses, occurred more than a year after transplant. Patients are at highest risk for Candida IFIs within the first 30 days after PT, likely secondary to organ space surgical site infections, despite receipt of antifungal prophylaxis. Breakthrough invasive candidiasis occurred in 90% of cases. Though our study lacked a comparator group without prophylaxis, these data question the effectiveness of fluconazole prophylaxis after PT. [Figure: see text] DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10678197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106781972023-11-27 2884. Incidence of Invasive Fungal Infections After Pancreas Transplantation Nair, Vaisak Yetmar, Zachary A Seville, Maria T Bosch, Wendelyn Beam, Elena Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: There is scarce data surrounding the epidemiology of invasive fungal infections (IFI) after pancreas transplantation (PT). Our centers’ PT protocols recommend universal fluconazole prophylaxis for at least 1 month, which is extended to 1 year for recipients who live in Coccidioides endemic areas. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the epidemiology of IFIs after PT while on our antifungal prophylaxis protocol. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed among adult patients who underwent PT at Mayo Clinic sites in Arizona, Florida, or Minnesota between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2020. IFI was defined based on EORTC/MSGERC criteria. The primary aim was to describe epidemiology and timing of IFI after PT, particularly in the context of the universal antifungal prophylaxis protocol. RESULTS: Among 482 pancreas transplant recipients, 35 developed IFIs (7.3%). All patients received antifungal prophylaxis per protocol for a median duration of 33 days (Figure 1). Median duration from time of transplant to IFI was 16 (IQR 10.5-28.2) days for Candida IFIs versus 529 (IQR 192.5-1195.0) days for non-Candida IFI. 20 IFIs (57.1%) were secondary to Candida species with 45% of these cases caused by either C. glabrata or C. krusei (Figure 2). 90% were on antifungal prophylaxis (85% fluconazole) at time of diagnosis of invasive candidiasis. All the Candida IFIs were intra-abdominal infections. Amongst the 15 non-Candida IFIs (42.9%), 9 were secondary to endemic mycoses and 4 were secondary to invasive molds. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Our study shows a high incidence of IFIs secondary to Candida, with few patients diagnosed with non-Candida IFIs (Figure 3). Non-Candida IFIs, mostly secondary to endemic mycoses, occurred more than a year after transplant. Patients are at highest risk for Candida IFIs within the first 30 days after PT, likely secondary to organ space surgical site infections, despite receipt of antifungal prophylaxis. Breakthrough invasive candidiasis occurred in 90% of cases. Though our study lacked a comparator group without prophylaxis, these data question the effectiveness of fluconazole prophylaxis after PT. [Figure: see text] DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10678197/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.161 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Nair, Vaisak
Yetmar, Zachary A
Seville, Maria T
Bosch, Wendelyn
Beam, Elena
2884. Incidence of Invasive Fungal Infections After Pancreas Transplantation
title 2884. Incidence of Invasive Fungal Infections After Pancreas Transplantation
title_full 2884. Incidence of Invasive Fungal Infections After Pancreas Transplantation
title_fullStr 2884. Incidence of Invasive Fungal Infections After Pancreas Transplantation
title_full_unstemmed 2884. Incidence of Invasive Fungal Infections After Pancreas Transplantation
title_short 2884. Incidence of Invasive Fungal Infections After Pancreas Transplantation
title_sort 2884. incidence of invasive fungal infections after pancreas transplantation
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678197/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.161
work_keys_str_mv AT nairvaisak 2884incidenceofinvasivefungalinfectionsafterpancreastransplantation
AT yetmarzacharya 2884incidenceofinvasivefungalinfectionsafterpancreastransplantation
AT sevillemariat 2884incidenceofinvasivefungalinfectionsafterpancreastransplantation
AT boschwendelyn 2884incidenceofinvasivefungalinfectionsafterpancreastransplantation
AT beamelena 2884incidenceofinvasivefungalinfectionsafterpancreastransplantation