Cargando…

1871. Lessons Learned from IGRA Test Practices in a Tertiary Hospital

BACKGROUND: Interferon Gamma Release Assay (IGRA) is frequently ordered in hospitalized patients for latent tuberculosis (TB) screening. Health care workers must be cautioned that acute and critical illness exert a significant effect on IGRA performance, so delaying screening to the outpatient setti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daas, Farah, Ruiz-Gaviria, Rafael, Thummar, Bhakti, Khan, Naveera, Ramdeen, Sheena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678203/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1699
_version_ 1785150306920693760
author Daas, Farah
Ruiz-Gaviria, Rafael
Thummar, Bhakti
Khan, Naveera
Ramdeen, Sheena
author_facet Daas, Farah
Ruiz-Gaviria, Rafael
Thummar, Bhakti
Khan, Naveera
Ramdeen, Sheena
author_sort Daas, Farah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Interferon Gamma Release Assay (IGRA) is frequently ordered in hospitalized patients for latent tuberculosis (TB) screening. Health care workers must be cautioned that acute and critical illness exert a significant effect on IGRA performance, so delaying screening to the outpatient setting is preferred if feasible. When active TB is suspected, IGRA can aid in risk stratification, particularly in areas with low prevalence of TB, but should not be used to confirm or rule out active TB infection. False negative IGRA results in active TB are estimated to be up to 20%. Current guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society suggest that IGRA cannot distinguish active from latent TB and recommend prompt microbiological testing when active TB is suspected. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review on hospitalized patients older than 18 years in a tertiary academic center who had an IGRA test done from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021. We randomly selected 78 from the 417 identified patients for collection of encounter level data. RESULTS: IGRA test indications were screening for latent TB in 53.8%, to investigate active pulmonary TB in 30.8%, and for other reasons in 6.4%. IGRA tests had no clear indication in 9% of cases. IGRA test results were 84.6% negative; 10.3% positive; and 5.1% indeterminate. After a negative IGRA, microbiological testing was ordered in 12%, with 1 positive test confirming active TB. Active TB was suspected in 30.8% of our cohort. Microbiologic testing was done in 41.6% of these patients. In most of the patients with microbiological testing, ordering was delayed until a positive IGRA was available with an average delay of 2.4 days. CONCLUSION: Collection of sputum for microbiological testing should not be delayed until IGRA test results are available, and negative results should be scrutinized when suspicion for active TB is high. Caution must be practiced in interpreting IGRA results, and we should not solely rely on IGRA in decision-making regarding isolation, treatment, or further testing. Education of health care staff may be required regarding the indications and timing of IGRA testing. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10678203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106782032023-11-27 1871. Lessons Learned from IGRA Test Practices in a Tertiary Hospital Daas, Farah Ruiz-Gaviria, Rafael Thummar, Bhakti Khan, Naveera Ramdeen, Sheena Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Interferon Gamma Release Assay (IGRA) is frequently ordered in hospitalized patients for latent tuberculosis (TB) screening. Health care workers must be cautioned that acute and critical illness exert a significant effect on IGRA performance, so delaying screening to the outpatient setting is preferred if feasible. When active TB is suspected, IGRA can aid in risk stratification, particularly in areas with low prevalence of TB, but should not be used to confirm or rule out active TB infection. False negative IGRA results in active TB are estimated to be up to 20%. Current guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society suggest that IGRA cannot distinguish active from latent TB and recommend prompt microbiological testing when active TB is suspected. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review on hospitalized patients older than 18 years in a tertiary academic center who had an IGRA test done from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021. We randomly selected 78 from the 417 identified patients for collection of encounter level data. RESULTS: IGRA test indications were screening for latent TB in 53.8%, to investigate active pulmonary TB in 30.8%, and for other reasons in 6.4%. IGRA tests had no clear indication in 9% of cases. IGRA test results were 84.6% negative; 10.3% positive; and 5.1% indeterminate. After a negative IGRA, microbiological testing was ordered in 12%, with 1 positive test confirming active TB. Active TB was suspected in 30.8% of our cohort. Microbiologic testing was done in 41.6% of these patients. In most of the patients with microbiological testing, ordering was delayed until a positive IGRA was available with an average delay of 2.4 days. CONCLUSION: Collection of sputum for microbiological testing should not be delayed until IGRA test results are available, and negative results should be scrutinized when suspicion for active TB is high. Caution must be practiced in interpreting IGRA results, and we should not solely rely on IGRA in decision-making regarding isolation, treatment, or further testing. Education of health care staff may be required regarding the indications and timing of IGRA testing. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10678203/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1699 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Daas, Farah
Ruiz-Gaviria, Rafael
Thummar, Bhakti
Khan, Naveera
Ramdeen, Sheena
1871. Lessons Learned from IGRA Test Practices in a Tertiary Hospital
title 1871. Lessons Learned from IGRA Test Practices in a Tertiary Hospital
title_full 1871. Lessons Learned from IGRA Test Practices in a Tertiary Hospital
title_fullStr 1871. Lessons Learned from IGRA Test Practices in a Tertiary Hospital
title_full_unstemmed 1871. Lessons Learned from IGRA Test Practices in a Tertiary Hospital
title_short 1871. Lessons Learned from IGRA Test Practices in a Tertiary Hospital
title_sort 1871. lessons learned from igra test practices in a tertiary hospital
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678203/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1699
work_keys_str_mv AT daasfarah 1871lessonslearnedfromigratestpracticesinatertiaryhospital
AT ruizgaviriarafael 1871lessonslearnedfromigratestpracticesinatertiaryhospital
AT thummarbhakti 1871lessonslearnedfromigratestpracticesinatertiaryhospital
AT khannaveera 1871lessonslearnedfromigratestpracticesinatertiaryhospital
AT ramdeensheena 1871lessonslearnedfromigratestpracticesinatertiaryhospital