Cargando…

1265. Penicillin Allergy Delabeling: A Quality Improvement Project

BACKGROUND: 15% of all hospitalized patients report a penicillin allergy, and greater than 90% of them are not truly allergic. Penicillin allergy labels are associated with worse clinical outcomes, increasing in-hospital mortality, and increasing hospital stays. Historically, penicillin allergies we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Ibrahim, Sheraz, Sana, Ali, Marriam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678215/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1105
_version_ 1785150309754994688
author Shah, Ibrahim
Sheraz, Sana
Ali, Marriam
author_facet Shah, Ibrahim
Sheraz, Sana
Ali, Marriam
author_sort Shah, Ibrahim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: 15% of all hospitalized patients report a penicillin allergy, and greater than 90% of them are not truly allergic. Penicillin allergy labels are associated with worse clinical outcomes, increasing in-hospital mortality, and increasing hospital stays. Historically, penicillin allergies were delabeled by either allergists or infectious disease specialists. Pharmacy-led delabeling programs are emerging but are limited due to pharmacists not having provider status in all states. Also, after successful delabeling, a significant number of patients were relabeled for penicillin allergies on subsequent hospital visits. METHODS: We conducted an internal medicine resident-driven quality improvement project in a 350 bed community hospital. Fifty-six patients with a penicillin allergy label in the electronic medical record (EMR) were randomly selected from the inpatient service. If the patient had a non-allergic reaction or had prior exposure to penicillin without a reaction, they were directly delabeled. The remainder underwent risk stratification using the PENFAST scoring tool. Very low-risk and low-risk patients underwent an oral challenge after obtaining written consent. Following this, a hospital-wide pharmacist-triggered physician-driven delabelling protocol was established. RESULTS: We assessed 56 patients between 04/2022 and 09/2022. Thirty-eight patients were delabeled: 18 by direct delabeling and 20 via oral penicillin challenge. One patient who underwent the oral challenge had an adverse reaction (nausea and vomiting). Seven months later, we conducted a secondary survey to assess the durability of our delabeling. Thirteen percent of patients (n=5) had the penicillin allergy label re-added to their chart on subsequent hospital admissions. CONCLUSION: Delabeling patients on the inpatient service is effective, carries little risk, and requires minimal resources. Additionally, it does not require specialist services. However, the durability of delabeling needs to be reinforced with a robust hospital delabeling protocol, continuous patient education, and EMR alerts to prevent allergy labels from being added back on subsequent visits. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10678215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106782152023-11-27 1265. Penicillin Allergy Delabeling: A Quality Improvement Project Shah, Ibrahim Sheraz, Sana Ali, Marriam Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: 15% of all hospitalized patients report a penicillin allergy, and greater than 90% of them are not truly allergic. Penicillin allergy labels are associated with worse clinical outcomes, increasing in-hospital mortality, and increasing hospital stays. Historically, penicillin allergies were delabeled by either allergists or infectious disease specialists. Pharmacy-led delabeling programs are emerging but are limited due to pharmacists not having provider status in all states. Also, after successful delabeling, a significant number of patients were relabeled for penicillin allergies on subsequent hospital visits. METHODS: We conducted an internal medicine resident-driven quality improvement project in a 350 bed community hospital. Fifty-six patients with a penicillin allergy label in the electronic medical record (EMR) were randomly selected from the inpatient service. If the patient had a non-allergic reaction or had prior exposure to penicillin without a reaction, they were directly delabeled. The remainder underwent risk stratification using the PENFAST scoring tool. Very low-risk and low-risk patients underwent an oral challenge after obtaining written consent. Following this, a hospital-wide pharmacist-triggered physician-driven delabelling protocol was established. RESULTS: We assessed 56 patients between 04/2022 and 09/2022. Thirty-eight patients were delabeled: 18 by direct delabeling and 20 via oral penicillin challenge. One patient who underwent the oral challenge had an adverse reaction (nausea and vomiting). Seven months later, we conducted a secondary survey to assess the durability of our delabeling. Thirteen percent of patients (n=5) had the penicillin allergy label re-added to their chart on subsequent hospital admissions. CONCLUSION: Delabeling patients on the inpatient service is effective, carries little risk, and requires minimal resources. Additionally, it does not require specialist services. However, the durability of delabeling needs to be reinforced with a robust hospital delabeling protocol, continuous patient education, and EMR alerts to prevent allergy labels from being added back on subsequent visits. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10678215/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1105 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Shah, Ibrahim
Sheraz, Sana
Ali, Marriam
1265. Penicillin Allergy Delabeling: A Quality Improvement Project
title 1265. Penicillin Allergy Delabeling: A Quality Improvement Project
title_full 1265. Penicillin Allergy Delabeling: A Quality Improvement Project
title_fullStr 1265. Penicillin Allergy Delabeling: A Quality Improvement Project
title_full_unstemmed 1265. Penicillin Allergy Delabeling: A Quality Improvement Project
title_short 1265. Penicillin Allergy Delabeling: A Quality Improvement Project
title_sort 1265. penicillin allergy delabeling: a quality improvement project
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678215/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1105
work_keys_str_mv AT shahibrahim 1265penicillinallergydelabelingaqualityimprovementproject
AT sherazsana 1265penicillinallergydelabelingaqualityimprovementproject
AT alimarriam 1265penicillinallergydelabelingaqualityimprovementproject