Cargando…

2586. Comparison of Antimicrobial Regimens for Critically Ill Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Retrospective, Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP) remain significant causes of morbidity and mortality among patients admitted to a medical facility. Consensus guidelines for the treatment of HAP/VAP recommend patients with certain risk factors be empirically treated with a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kosharek, Abigail, Betthauser, Kevin, Juang, Paul, Micek, Scott, Igles, Dan, Kollef, Marin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678221/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2201
_version_ 1785150311152746496
author Kosharek, Abigail
Betthauser, Kevin
Juang, Paul
Micek, Scott
Igles, Dan
Kollef, Marin
author_facet Kosharek, Abigail
Betthauser, Kevin
Juang, Paul
Micek, Scott
Igles, Dan
Kollef, Marin
author_sort Kosharek, Abigail
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP) remain significant causes of morbidity and mortality among patients admitted to a medical facility. Consensus guidelines for the treatment of HAP/VAP recommend patients with certain risk factors be empirically treated with an anti-methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and anti-pseudomonal antibiotic. The most commonly utilized anti-pseudomonal agents at BJC hospitals include cefepime, followed by piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem. The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a difference in clinical outcomes between cefepime and the other most commonly used anti-pseudomonal antibiotics, piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem, at these institutions for the treatment of HAP/VAP. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included adult patients with HAP/VAP who received cefepime, meropenem, or piperacillin/tazobactam. Major exclusion criteria included patients that received antibiotics within 48 hours of hospital admission or less than 48 hours of empiric antibiotics. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included change in initial antibiotic, mechanical ventilation-free days, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, hospital readmission, and new C. difficile infection. RESULTS: Of 1,117 included patients, 1,008 patients received cefepime and 109 received meropenem or piperacillin/tazobactam. Incidence of in-hospital mortality was not observed to be significantly different among empiric Gram-negative regimens (cefepime group 19.4% vs. meropenem or piperacillin/tazobactam 22%, p=0.521. Change in initial antibiotic, ICU length of stay, and hospital length of stay were observed to be significantly higher in the cefepime group. CONCLUSION: We observed no difference in in-hospital mortality between cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem. However, there was a significantly higher incidence of change in initial antibiotic, ICU length of stay, and hospital length of stay observed in the cefepime group, though additional research is needed to corroborate these observations. DISCLOSURES: Kevin Betthauser, PharmD, La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company: Advisor/Consultant|La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company: Grant/Research Support Paul Juang, Pharm.D., Merck & Co: Grant/Research Support
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10678221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106782212023-11-27 2586. Comparison of Antimicrobial Regimens for Critically Ill Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Retrospective, Cohort Study Kosharek, Abigail Betthauser, Kevin Juang, Paul Micek, Scott Igles, Dan Kollef, Marin Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP) remain significant causes of morbidity and mortality among patients admitted to a medical facility. Consensus guidelines for the treatment of HAP/VAP recommend patients with certain risk factors be empirically treated with an anti-methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and anti-pseudomonal antibiotic. The most commonly utilized anti-pseudomonal agents at BJC hospitals include cefepime, followed by piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem. The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a difference in clinical outcomes between cefepime and the other most commonly used anti-pseudomonal antibiotics, piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem, at these institutions for the treatment of HAP/VAP. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included adult patients with HAP/VAP who received cefepime, meropenem, or piperacillin/tazobactam. Major exclusion criteria included patients that received antibiotics within 48 hours of hospital admission or less than 48 hours of empiric antibiotics. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included change in initial antibiotic, mechanical ventilation-free days, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, hospital readmission, and new C. difficile infection. RESULTS: Of 1,117 included patients, 1,008 patients received cefepime and 109 received meropenem or piperacillin/tazobactam. Incidence of in-hospital mortality was not observed to be significantly different among empiric Gram-negative regimens (cefepime group 19.4% vs. meropenem or piperacillin/tazobactam 22%, p=0.521. Change in initial antibiotic, ICU length of stay, and hospital length of stay were observed to be significantly higher in the cefepime group. CONCLUSION: We observed no difference in in-hospital mortality between cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem. However, there was a significantly higher incidence of change in initial antibiotic, ICU length of stay, and hospital length of stay observed in the cefepime group, though additional research is needed to corroborate these observations. DISCLOSURES: Kevin Betthauser, PharmD, La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company: Advisor/Consultant|La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company: Grant/Research Support Paul Juang, Pharm.D., Merck & Co: Grant/Research Support Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10678221/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2201 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Kosharek, Abigail
Betthauser, Kevin
Juang, Paul
Micek, Scott
Igles, Dan
Kollef, Marin
2586. Comparison of Antimicrobial Regimens for Critically Ill Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Retrospective, Cohort Study
title 2586. Comparison of Antimicrobial Regimens for Critically Ill Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Retrospective, Cohort Study
title_full 2586. Comparison of Antimicrobial Regimens for Critically Ill Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Retrospective, Cohort Study
title_fullStr 2586. Comparison of Antimicrobial Regimens for Critically Ill Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Retrospective, Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed 2586. Comparison of Antimicrobial Regimens for Critically Ill Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Retrospective, Cohort Study
title_short 2586. Comparison of Antimicrobial Regimens for Critically Ill Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Retrospective, Cohort Study
title_sort 2586. comparison of antimicrobial regimens for critically ill patients with suspected or confirmed hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated pneumonia: a retrospective, cohort study
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678221/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2201
work_keys_str_mv AT kosharekabigail 2586comparisonofantimicrobialregimensforcriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedorconfirmedhospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedpneumoniaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT betthauserkevin 2586comparisonofantimicrobialregimensforcriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedorconfirmedhospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedpneumoniaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT juangpaul 2586comparisonofantimicrobialregimensforcriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedorconfirmedhospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedpneumoniaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT micekscott 2586comparisonofantimicrobialregimensforcriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedorconfirmedhospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedpneumoniaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT iglesdan 2586comparisonofantimicrobialregimensforcriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedorconfirmedhospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedpneumoniaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kollefmarin 2586comparisonofantimicrobialregimensforcriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedorconfirmedhospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedpneumoniaaretrospectivecohortstudy