Cargando…

273. Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) Bathing in Nursing Homes (NHs) and Hospitals: Impact on the Nose & Skin Microbiome and Multidrug Resistant Organism (MDRO) Prevalence

BACKGROUND: Widespread CHG bathing to prevent infection has raised concerns about potential skin microbiome perturbations and depletion of commensal microbiota. METHODS: A prospective repeated measures cross-over study in NH residents/hospital patients evaluated the impact of CHG vs routine soap bat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gussin, Gabrielle, Conlan, Sean, Singh, Raveena D, Deming, Clay, Saavedra, Raheeb, Nguyen, Connie, Tjoa, Thomas T, Pedroza, Robert, Berman, Chase, Shimabukuro, Julie A, Bell, Pamela B, Baskaran, Sangeetha, Stanley, Mary, Hayden, Mary K, Bittencourt, Cassiana E, Segre, Julie, Huang, Susan S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678253/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.345
_version_ 1785150318561984512
author Gussin, Gabrielle
Conlan, Sean
Singh, Raveena D
Deming, Clay
Saavedra, Raheeb
Nguyen, Connie
Tjoa, Thomas T
Pedroza, Robert
Berman, Chase
Shimabukuro, Julie A
Bell, Pamela B
Baskaran, Sangeetha
Stanley, Mary
Hayden, Mary K
Bittencourt, Cassiana E
Segre, Julie
Huang, Susan S
author_facet Gussin, Gabrielle
Conlan, Sean
Singh, Raveena D
Deming, Clay
Saavedra, Raheeb
Nguyen, Connie
Tjoa, Thomas T
Pedroza, Robert
Berman, Chase
Shimabukuro, Julie A
Bell, Pamela B
Baskaran, Sangeetha
Stanley, Mary
Hayden, Mary K
Bittencourt, Cassiana E
Segre, Julie
Huang, Susan S
author_sort Gussin, Gabrielle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Widespread CHG bathing to prevent infection has raised concerns about potential skin microbiome perturbations and depletion of commensal microbiota. METHODS: A prospective repeated measures cross-over study in NH residents/hospital patients evaluated the impact of CHG vs routine soap bathing on the nose/skin microbiome. Participants underwent serial visits during distinct CHG and routine soap phases (Figure) involving nares, axilla, groin, and finger/hand swabs processed for MDROs, CHG concentration (skin sites only), and bacterial 16S rRNA V1-3 gene sequencing (Illumina MiSeq). Sequences were processed with DADA2 and analyzed with PhyloSeq and Vegan packages in R to calculate microbial diversity and composition. RESULTS: We enrolled 30 participants (20 NH, 10 hospital). Mean age was 62y, 52% female. Mean CHG concentration was 1736 µg/mL (range: 0-20000) during CHG visits vs 17.5 µg/mL (range: 0-1250) during routine soap visits. MDRO prevalence was lower during CHG visits (NH: 19%, hospital: 9%) vs routine soap visits (NH: 47%, hospital: 23%). 555 samples from 30 participants were adequate for microbiome analyses. CHG did not affect overall alpha diversity of microbial communities on skin (Figure), but proteobacteria were notably higher in NH vs hospital participants (P< 0.001). Because gram-negative bacteria often exhibit higher MICs to CHG than gram-positive bacteria, we assessed whether CHG concentration in NHs was associated with greater relative abundance of proteobacteria using generalized linear mixed models clustered by person. In NHs, CHG concentration was not associated with relative abundance of skin proteobacteria, although body mass index ≥30 (14% higher abundance, P=0.01) and stool/urine incontinence were (13% higher, P=0.01). Compared to the axilla, the groin had 35% higher relative abundance of proteobacteria (P< 0.001); fingers/hand samples had 9% lower (P=0.01). Nose/Skin Taxonomic Diversity Not Impacted by CHG Bathing [Figure: see text] Timeline and alpha diversity using the Shannon Diversity Index of axilla, groin, finger/hand, and nares samples during CHG versus routine soap bathing phases. Each dot represents a sample. There were no significant differences in alpha diversity between CHG and routine soap phases. [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: CHG bathing reduced MDRO prevalence but did not impact skin or nasal microbial alpha diversity in hospital or NH participants. Overall, NH residents had notably higher relative abundance of skin proteobacteria vs hospital patients. This finding was not associated with CHG concentration. Rather, proteobacteria appeared enriched in NH residents with obesity or incontinence. DISCLOSURES: Gabrielle Gussin, MS, Medline Industries, Inc: Conducted studies where participating hospitals/nursing homes received cleaning & antiseptic product|Xttrium Laboratories: Conducted studies where participating hospitals & nursing homes received antiseptic bathing product Raveena D. Singh, MA, Medline Industries, Inc: Conducted studies where participating hospitals/nursing homes received cleaning & antiseptic product|Xttrium Laboratories: Conducted studies where participating hospitals & nursing homes received antiseptic bathing product Raheeb Saavedra, AS, Medline Industries, Inc: Conducted studies where participating hospitals/nursing homes received cleaning & antiseptic product|Xttrium Laboratories: Conducted studies where participating hospitals & nursing homes received antiseptic bathing product Connie Nguyen, n/a, Xttrium Laboratories: Conducted studies where participating hospitals & nursing homes received antiseptic bathing product Robert Pedroza, BS, Medline Industries, Inc: Conducted studies where participating hospitals/nursing homes received cleaning & antiseptic product Chase Berman, BS, Medline Industries, Inc: Conducted studies where participating hospitals/nursing homes received cleaning & antiseptic product Susan S. Huang, MD MPH, Medline Industries, Inc: Conducted studies whereby participating nursing homes and hospital patients received cleaning & antiseptic products|Xttrium Laboratories: Conducted studies where participating nursing homes and hospital patients received antiseptic products
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10678253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106782532023-11-27 273. Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) Bathing in Nursing Homes (NHs) and Hospitals: Impact on the Nose & Skin Microbiome and Multidrug Resistant Organism (MDRO) Prevalence Gussin, Gabrielle Conlan, Sean Singh, Raveena D Deming, Clay Saavedra, Raheeb Nguyen, Connie Tjoa, Thomas T Pedroza, Robert Berman, Chase Shimabukuro, Julie A Bell, Pamela B Baskaran, Sangeetha Stanley, Mary Hayden, Mary K Bittencourt, Cassiana E Segre, Julie Huang, Susan S Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Widespread CHG bathing to prevent infection has raised concerns about potential skin microbiome perturbations and depletion of commensal microbiota. METHODS: A prospective repeated measures cross-over study in NH residents/hospital patients evaluated the impact of CHG vs routine soap bathing on the nose/skin microbiome. Participants underwent serial visits during distinct CHG and routine soap phases (Figure) involving nares, axilla, groin, and finger/hand swabs processed for MDROs, CHG concentration (skin sites only), and bacterial 16S rRNA V1-3 gene sequencing (Illumina MiSeq). Sequences were processed with DADA2 and analyzed with PhyloSeq and Vegan packages in R to calculate microbial diversity and composition. RESULTS: We enrolled 30 participants (20 NH, 10 hospital). Mean age was 62y, 52% female. Mean CHG concentration was 1736 µg/mL (range: 0-20000) during CHG visits vs 17.5 µg/mL (range: 0-1250) during routine soap visits. MDRO prevalence was lower during CHG visits (NH: 19%, hospital: 9%) vs routine soap visits (NH: 47%, hospital: 23%). 555 samples from 30 participants were adequate for microbiome analyses. CHG did not affect overall alpha diversity of microbial communities on skin (Figure), but proteobacteria were notably higher in NH vs hospital participants (P< 0.001). Because gram-negative bacteria often exhibit higher MICs to CHG than gram-positive bacteria, we assessed whether CHG concentration in NHs was associated with greater relative abundance of proteobacteria using generalized linear mixed models clustered by person. In NHs, CHG concentration was not associated with relative abundance of skin proteobacteria, although body mass index ≥30 (14% higher abundance, P=0.01) and stool/urine incontinence were (13% higher, P=0.01). Compared to the axilla, the groin had 35% higher relative abundance of proteobacteria (P< 0.001); fingers/hand samples had 9% lower (P=0.01). Nose/Skin Taxonomic Diversity Not Impacted by CHG Bathing [Figure: see text] Timeline and alpha diversity using the Shannon Diversity Index of axilla, groin, finger/hand, and nares samples during CHG versus routine soap bathing phases. Each dot represents a sample. There were no significant differences in alpha diversity between CHG and routine soap phases. [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: CHG bathing reduced MDRO prevalence but did not impact skin or nasal microbial alpha diversity in hospital or NH participants. Overall, NH residents had notably higher relative abundance of skin proteobacteria vs hospital patients. This finding was not associated with CHG concentration. Rather, proteobacteria appeared enriched in NH residents with obesity or incontinence. DISCLOSURES: Gabrielle Gussin, MS, Medline Industries, Inc: Conducted studies where participating hospitals/nursing homes received cleaning & antiseptic product|Xttrium Laboratories: Conducted studies where participating hospitals & nursing homes received antiseptic bathing product Raveena D. Singh, MA, Medline Industries, Inc: Conducted studies where participating hospitals/nursing homes received cleaning & antiseptic product|Xttrium Laboratories: Conducted studies where participating hospitals & nursing homes received antiseptic bathing product Raheeb Saavedra, AS, Medline Industries, Inc: Conducted studies where participating hospitals/nursing homes received cleaning & antiseptic product|Xttrium Laboratories: Conducted studies where participating hospitals & nursing homes received antiseptic bathing product Connie Nguyen, n/a, Xttrium Laboratories: Conducted studies where participating hospitals & nursing homes received antiseptic bathing product Robert Pedroza, BS, Medline Industries, Inc: Conducted studies where participating hospitals/nursing homes received cleaning & antiseptic product Chase Berman, BS, Medline Industries, Inc: Conducted studies where participating hospitals/nursing homes received cleaning & antiseptic product Susan S. Huang, MD MPH, Medline Industries, Inc: Conducted studies whereby participating nursing homes and hospital patients received cleaning & antiseptic products|Xttrium Laboratories: Conducted studies where participating nursing homes and hospital patients received antiseptic products Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10678253/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.345 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Gussin, Gabrielle
Conlan, Sean
Singh, Raveena D
Deming, Clay
Saavedra, Raheeb
Nguyen, Connie
Tjoa, Thomas T
Pedroza, Robert
Berman, Chase
Shimabukuro, Julie A
Bell, Pamela B
Baskaran, Sangeetha
Stanley, Mary
Hayden, Mary K
Bittencourt, Cassiana E
Segre, Julie
Huang, Susan S
273. Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) Bathing in Nursing Homes (NHs) and Hospitals: Impact on the Nose & Skin Microbiome and Multidrug Resistant Organism (MDRO) Prevalence
title 273. Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) Bathing in Nursing Homes (NHs) and Hospitals: Impact on the Nose & Skin Microbiome and Multidrug Resistant Organism (MDRO) Prevalence
title_full 273. Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) Bathing in Nursing Homes (NHs) and Hospitals: Impact on the Nose & Skin Microbiome and Multidrug Resistant Organism (MDRO) Prevalence
title_fullStr 273. Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) Bathing in Nursing Homes (NHs) and Hospitals: Impact on the Nose & Skin Microbiome and Multidrug Resistant Organism (MDRO) Prevalence
title_full_unstemmed 273. Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) Bathing in Nursing Homes (NHs) and Hospitals: Impact on the Nose & Skin Microbiome and Multidrug Resistant Organism (MDRO) Prevalence
title_short 273. Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) Bathing in Nursing Homes (NHs) and Hospitals: Impact on the Nose & Skin Microbiome and Multidrug Resistant Organism (MDRO) Prevalence
title_sort 273. chlorhexidine gluconate (chg) bathing in nursing homes (nhs) and hospitals: impact on the nose & skin microbiome and multidrug resistant organism (mdro) prevalence
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678253/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.345
work_keys_str_mv AT gussingabrielle 273chlorhexidinegluconatechgbathinginnursinghomesnhsandhospitalsimpactonthenoseskinmicrobiomeandmultidrugresistantorganismmdroprevalence
AT conlansean 273chlorhexidinegluconatechgbathinginnursinghomesnhsandhospitalsimpactonthenoseskinmicrobiomeandmultidrugresistantorganismmdroprevalence
AT singhraveenad 273chlorhexidinegluconatechgbathinginnursinghomesnhsandhospitalsimpactonthenoseskinmicrobiomeandmultidrugresistantorganismmdroprevalence
AT demingclay 273chlorhexidinegluconatechgbathinginnursinghomesnhsandhospitalsimpactonthenoseskinmicrobiomeandmultidrugresistantorganismmdroprevalence
AT saavedraraheeb 273chlorhexidinegluconatechgbathinginnursinghomesnhsandhospitalsimpactonthenoseskinmicrobiomeandmultidrugresistantorganismmdroprevalence
AT nguyenconnie 273chlorhexidinegluconatechgbathinginnursinghomesnhsandhospitalsimpactonthenoseskinmicrobiomeandmultidrugresistantorganismmdroprevalence
AT tjoathomast 273chlorhexidinegluconatechgbathinginnursinghomesnhsandhospitalsimpactonthenoseskinmicrobiomeandmultidrugresistantorganismmdroprevalence
AT pedrozarobert 273chlorhexidinegluconatechgbathinginnursinghomesnhsandhospitalsimpactonthenoseskinmicrobiomeandmultidrugresistantorganismmdroprevalence
AT bermanchase 273chlorhexidinegluconatechgbathinginnursinghomesnhsandhospitalsimpactonthenoseskinmicrobiomeandmultidrugresistantorganismmdroprevalence
AT shimabukurojuliea 273chlorhexidinegluconatechgbathinginnursinghomesnhsandhospitalsimpactonthenoseskinmicrobiomeandmultidrugresistantorganismmdroprevalence
AT bellpamelab 273chlorhexidinegluconatechgbathinginnursinghomesnhsandhospitalsimpactonthenoseskinmicrobiomeandmultidrugresistantorganismmdroprevalence
AT baskaransangeetha 273chlorhexidinegluconatechgbathinginnursinghomesnhsandhospitalsimpactonthenoseskinmicrobiomeandmultidrugresistantorganismmdroprevalence
AT stanleymary 273chlorhexidinegluconatechgbathinginnursinghomesnhsandhospitalsimpactonthenoseskinmicrobiomeandmultidrugresistantorganismmdroprevalence
AT haydenmaryk 273chlorhexidinegluconatechgbathinginnursinghomesnhsandhospitalsimpactonthenoseskinmicrobiomeandmultidrugresistantorganismmdroprevalence
AT bittencourtcassianae 273chlorhexidinegluconatechgbathinginnursinghomesnhsandhospitalsimpactonthenoseskinmicrobiomeandmultidrugresistantorganismmdroprevalence
AT segrejulie 273chlorhexidinegluconatechgbathinginnursinghomesnhsandhospitalsimpactonthenoseskinmicrobiomeandmultidrugresistantorganismmdroprevalence
AT huangsusans 273chlorhexidinegluconatechgbathinginnursinghomesnhsandhospitalsimpactonthenoseskinmicrobiomeandmultidrugresistantorganismmdroprevalence