Cargando…

2154. Cross-resistance of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam and Imipenem-Relebactam Against Clinical P. aeruginosa Isolates from Bloodstream and Respiratory Tract Infections– SMART United States 2019-2021

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance among Pseudomonas aeruginosa is challenging with limited treatment options. Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) maintains activity against P. aeruginosa resistant to commonly used β-lactams. Imipenem/relebactam (IMI/REL) can restore the activity of IMI against P. aerugi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lob, Sibylle, Wise, Mark G, Bauer, Karri, Siddiqui, Fakhar, Hilbert, David W, Esterly, John, DeRyke, C Andrew, Young, Katherine, Motyl, Mary, Sahm, Daniel F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678284/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.1777
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance among Pseudomonas aeruginosa is challenging with limited treatment options. Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) maintains activity against P. aeruginosa resistant to commonly used β-lactams. Imipenem/relebactam (IMI/REL) can restore the activity of IMI against P. aeruginosa. C/T and IMI/REL can be affected by different mechanisms of resistance, and pathogens can be nonsusceptible to one agent but susceptible to the other. We evaluated the activity of C/T and IMI/REL against P. aeruginosa isolates collected from patients with lower respiratory tract (LRTI) and bloodstream (BSI) infections in the United States as part of the global SMART surveillance program. METHODS: In 2019-2021, 24 US clinical labs collected up to 100 consecutive, aerobic or facultative, gram-negative pathogens from LRTI and up to 50 from BSI. Of 8643 collected isolates, 1986 (23%) were P. aeruginosa. Susceptibility was determined with CLSI broth microdilution and 2023 CLSI breakpoints. RESULTS: Among P. aeruginosa BSI and LRTI isolates, 88% were susceptible (S) to both C/T and IMI/REL, 2% were nonsusceptible (NS) to both agents; 8% were S to C/T but not to IMI/REL, and 2% were S to IMI/REL but not to C/T (Table 1). Among MDR and DTR isolates, 45% and 29%, respectively, were S to both C/T and IMI/REL and 11% and 20%, respectively, were NS to both. Among C/T-NS isolates, 57.3% and 44.0% were S to IMI/REL and ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA), respectively (Table 2). Among IMI/REL-NS isolates, 83% were C/T-S, 69% CZA-S, and < 43% were S to all other studied β-lactams and LVX. Among CZA-R isolates, 61% and 47% remained S to C/T and IMI/REL, respectively. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Resistance to both C/T and IMI/REL was not common among recent clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa from the US, and both agents represent important treatment options. A significant proportion of isolates NS to one agent were S to the other, especially among MDR and DTR isolates. The data suggest that susceptibility to both agents should be tested. DISCLOSURES: Sibylle Lob, MD, Merck & Co., Inc.: Honoraria Mark G Wise, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc.: Honoraria|Pfizer Inc.: Honoraria|Venatorx: Paid fees for conducting the study and abstract preparation Fakhar Siddiqui, MD, MBA, Merck & Co Inc.: Employee Daniel F. Sahm, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc.: Honoraria|Pfizer Inc.: Honoraria|Venatorx: Paid fees for conducting the study and abstract preparation