Cargando…

533. Use of Different Communication Types for Telehealth for COVID-19 During Implementation of a State Telehealth Test to Treat Program in Minnesota

BACKGROUND: Telehealth programs for COVID-19 have expanded and may use multiple types of communication, such as mobile apps, web-based or telephone. Data on use of these communications are lacking, particularly in different age groups. We assessed use of three different communication types during im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Sarah, Dubelko, Paige, James, Walter, McLachlan, Erin, Tsay, David, Lynfield, Ruth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678287/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.602
_version_ 1785150326960029696
author Lim, Sarah
Dubelko, Paige
James, Walter
McLachlan, Erin
Tsay, David
Lynfield, Ruth
author_facet Lim, Sarah
Dubelko, Paige
James, Walter
McLachlan, Erin
Tsay, David
Lynfield, Ruth
author_sort Lim, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Telehealth programs for COVID-19 have expanded and may use multiple types of communication, such as mobile apps, web-based or telephone. Data on use of these communications are lacking, particularly in different age groups. We assessed use of three different communication types during implementation of a test to treat program for COVID-19 in Minnesota. METHODS: Minnesota launched its telehealth program in two phases: Phase 1 (mobile app only) during initial rollout from 12/15/22 – 1/5/23 and Phase 2 (addition of web and phone options) from 1/6/23 – 4/30/23. Data on users of the program were provided by the vendor (Cue Health), including communication type (app, web, phone), number of attempts, antiviral prescription, age, and sex. RESULTS: Data were available for 2093 patients who completed the intake process between 12/15/22 and 4/30/23, of whom 1928 (92%) completed the consultation process and 1808 (86%) received an antiviral. 60% of users were female. 250 patients (12%) completed the intake more than once on the same day, which may reflect multiple attempts due to technical barriers. During the study period, patients aged 35-44 and ≥ 65 years made up the largest proportion of users by age group (each had 464 patients, each 22% of total, Figure 1). 37% of users accessed the program via the phone and 37% via the app, with 26% using the website. Communication preferences varied by age, with increased use of the phone option in older age groups (54% of ≥ 65 vs 30% of 18-34 years, Figure 2). In comparison to users who made a single attempt, users who made multiple attempts were more likely to be younger (48 vs 51 years, p=0.02), and less likely to be prescribed an antiviral (80% vs 91%, p< .001). Users with multiple attempts were more likely to have used the web option for their first attempt (47% vs 24%, p< .001). Those with multiple attempts generally used the same communication type for all attempts (204/250); of those who switched, the commonest switch was to the phone (39/46). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Of the three communication types, the phone and app options were most popular, with a trend towards more phone use in older age groups. A phone option should be considered in future telehealth initiatives, including as a backup for those with technical barriers to app or web-based communication. DISCLOSURES: David Tsay, MD PhD, Cue Health: Chief Medical Officer|Cue Health: Stocks/Bonds
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10678287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106782872023-11-27 533. Use of Different Communication Types for Telehealth for COVID-19 During Implementation of a State Telehealth Test to Treat Program in Minnesota Lim, Sarah Dubelko, Paige James, Walter McLachlan, Erin Tsay, David Lynfield, Ruth Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Telehealth programs for COVID-19 have expanded and may use multiple types of communication, such as mobile apps, web-based or telephone. Data on use of these communications are lacking, particularly in different age groups. We assessed use of three different communication types during implementation of a test to treat program for COVID-19 in Minnesota. METHODS: Minnesota launched its telehealth program in two phases: Phase 1 (mobile app only) during initial rollout from 12/15/22 – 1/5/23 and Phase 2 (addition of web and phone options) from 1/6/23 – 4/30/23. Data on users of the program were provided by the vendor (Cue Health), including communication type (app, web, phone), number of attempts, antiviral prescription, age, and sex. RESULTS: Data were available for 2093 patients who completed the intake process between 12/15/22 and 4/30/23, of whom 1928 (92%) completed the consultation process and 1808 (86%) received an antiviral. 60% of users were female. 250 patients (12%) completed the intake more than once on the same day, which may reflect multiple attempts due to technical barriers. During the study period, patients aged 35-44 and ≥ 65 years made up the largest proportion of users by age group (each had 464 patients, each 22% of total, Figure 1). 37% of users accessed the program via the phone and 37% via the app, with 26% using the website. Communication preferences varied by age, with increased use of the phone option in older age groups (54% of ≥ 65 vs 30% of 18-34 years, Figure 2). In comparison to users who made a single attempt, users who made multiple attempts were more likely to be younger (48 vs 51 years, p=0.02), and less likely to be prescribed an antiviral (80% vs 91%, p< .001). Users with multiple attempts were more likely to have used the web option for their first attempt (47% vs 24%, p< .001). Those with multiple attempts generally used the same communication type for all attempts (204/250); of those who switched, the commonest switch was to the phone (39/46). [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Of the three communication types, the phone and app options were most popular, with a trend towards more phone use in older age groups. A phone option should be considered in future telehealth initiatives, including as a backup for those with technical barriers to app or web-based communication. DISCLOSURES: David Tsay, MD PhD, Cue Health: Chief Medical Officer|Cue Health: Stocks/Bonds Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10678287/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.602 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Lim, Sarah
Dubelko, Paige
James, Walter
McLachlan, Erin
Tsay, David
Lynfield, Ruth
533. Use of Different Communication Types for Telehealth for COVID-19 During Implementation of a State Telehealth Test to Treat Program in Minnesota
title 533. Use of Different Communication Types for Telehealth for COVID-19 During Implementation of a State Telehealth Test to Treat Program in Minnesota
title_full 533. Use of Different Communication Types for Telehealth for COVID-19 During Implementation of a State Telehealth Test to Treat Program in Minnesota
title_fullStr 533. Use of Different Communication Types for Telehealth for COVID-19 During Implementation of a State Telehealth Test to Treat Program in Minnesota
title_full_unstemmed 533. Use of Different Communication Types for Telehealth for COVID-19 During Implementation of a State Telehealth Test to Treat Program in Minnesota
title_short 533. Use of Different Communication Types for Telehealth for COVID-19 During Implementation of a State Telehealth Test to Treat Program in Minnesota
title_sort 533. use of different communication types for telehealth for covid-19 during implementation of a state telehealth test to treat program in minnesota
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678287/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.602
work_keys_str_mv AT limsarah 533useofdifferentcommunicationtypesfortelehealthforcovid19duringimplementationofastatetelehealthtesttotreatprograminminnesota
AT dubelkopaige 533useofdifferentcommunicationtypesfortelehealthforcovid19duringimplementationofastatetelehealthtesttotreatprograminminnesota
AT jameswalter 533useofdifferentcommunicationtypesfortelehealthforcovid19duringimplementationofastatetelehealthtesttotreatprograminminnesota
AT mclachlanerin 533useofdifferentcommunicationtypesfortelehealthforcovid19duringimplementationofastatetelehealthtesttotreatprograminminnesota
AT tsaydavid 533useofdifferentcommunicationtypesfortelehealthforcovid19duringimplementationofastatetelehealthtesttotreatprograminminnesota
AT lynfieldruth 533useofdifferentcommunicationtypesfortelehealthforcovid19duringimplementationofastatetelehealthtesttotreatprograminminnesota