Cargando…

2577. Comparing Omadacycline with Existing Antibiotics in the treatment of Acute Bacterial Infections: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Omadacycline (OMC), the first aminomethylcycline antibiotic, is a semisynthetic tetracycline derivative approved for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial soft skin infection (ABSSI), with a broad range of activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fabara, Stephanie P, Alok, Akankcha, Padam, Sripal, Yancey, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678306/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2193
_version_ 1785150330846052352
author Fabara, Stephanie P
Alok, Akankcha
Padam, Sripal
Yancey, Robert
author_facet Fabara, Stephanie P
Alok, Akankcha
Padam, Sripal
Yancey, Robert
author_sort Fabara, Stephanie P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Omadacycline (OMC), the first aminomethylcycline antibiotic, is a semisynthetic tetracycline derivative approved for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial soft skin infection (ABSSI), with a broad range of activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobes, anaerobes and atypical bacteria, including drug-resistant strains. It is currently under development for the treatment of cystitis and acute pyelonephritis (AP). METHODS: This systematic review of literature followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Abstracts were searched using the term: “omadacycline”. The electronic research literature databases included the Cochrane Library, MedLine, and clinicaltrials.gov from February to April 2023. Selection of studies by PRISMA flowchart is shown in figure 1. Characteristics of endpoints for each pathology are mentioned in table 1. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] RESULTS: OMC was found to be noninferior to existing antibiotics in all reviewed studies. The most common side effects of OMC were nausea, vomiting and diarrhea, which were infrequent, mild and easily treatable. The only limitation of these studies was proving the efficacy of OMC by non-inferiority. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane collaboration's tool risk assessment of the clinical trials (Figure 2). Characteristics and outcomes of each study are mentioned in table 2. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] References [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Most studies showed that OMC was well tolerated, with decreased frequency of dosing, availability of both oral and intravenous options, and with equal if not better efficacy than the existing drugs. OMC has activity against common tetracycline resistance mechanisms such as efflux pumps and ribosomal protection proteins. It is excreted unchanged, having low potential for drug-drug interaction and requires no dose adjustment for age, sex, or hepatic and renal impairment. Further large scale studies are encouraged to prove OMC as an emerging antibiotic of choice for several bacterial infections. Overall, OMC appears to be a promising drug with a good safety profile. With the help of this systematic review, we aim to encourage the use of OMC for cystitis and pyelonephritis, along with continued use for CABP and ABSSI. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10678306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106783062023-11-27 2577. Comparing Omadacycline with Existing Antibiotics in the treatment of Acute Bacterial Infections: A Systematic Review Fabara, Stephanie P Alok, Akankcha Padam, Sripal Yancey, Robert Open Forum Infect Dis Abstract BACKGROUND: Omadacycline (OMC), the first aminomethylcycline antibiotic, is a semisynthetic tetracycline derivative approved for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial soft skin infection (ABSSI), with a broad range of activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobes, anaerobes and atypical bacteria, including drug-resistant strains. It is currently under development for the treatment of cystitis and acute pyelonephritis (AP). METHODS: This systematic review of literature followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Abstracts were searched using the term: “omadacycline”. The electronic research literature databases included the Cochrane Library, MedLine, and clinicaltrials.gov from February to April 2023. Selection of studies by PRISMA flowchart is shown in figure 1. Characteristics of endpoints for each pathology are mentioned in table 1. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] RESULTS: OMC was found to be noninferior to existing antibiotics in all reviewed studies. The most common side effects of OMC were nausea, vomiting and diarrhea, which were infrequent, mild and easily treatable. The only limitation of these studies was proving the efficacy of OMC by non-inferiority. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane collaboration's tool risk assessment of the clinical trials (Figure 2). Characteristics and outcomes of each study are mentioned in table 2. [Figure: see text] [Figure: see text] References [Figure: see text] CONCLUSION: Most studies showed that OMC was well tolerated, with decreased frequency of dosing, availability of both oral and intravenous options, and with equal if not better efficacy than the existing drugs. OMC has activity against common tetracycline resistance mechanisms such as efflux pumps and ribosomal protection proteins. It is excreted unchanged, having low potential for drug-drug interaction and requires no dose adjustment for age, sex, or hepatic and renal impairment. Further large scale studies are encouraged to prove OMC as an emerging antibiotic of choice for several bacterial infections. Overall, OMC appears to be a promising drug with a good safety profile. With the help of this systematic review, we aim to encourage the use of OMC for cystitis and pyelonephritis, along with continued use for CABP and ABSSI. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10678306/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2193 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Fabara, Stephanie P
Alok, Akankcha
Padam, Sripal
Yancey, Robert
2577. Comparing Omadacycline with Existing Antibiotics in the treatment of Acute Bacterial Infections: A Systematic Review
title 2577. Comparing Omadacycline with Existing Antibiotics in the treatment of Acute Bacterial Infections: A Systematic Review
title_full 2577. Comparing Omadacycline with Existing Antibiotics in the treatment of Acute Bacterial Infections: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr 2577. Comparing Omadacycline with Existing Antibiotics in the treatment of Acute Bacterial Infections: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed 2577. Comparing Omadacycline with Existing Antibiotics in the treatment of Acute Bacterial Infections: A Systematic Review
title_short 2577. Comparing Omadacycline with Existing Antibiotics in the treatment of Acute Bacterial Infections: A Systematic Review
title_sort 2577. comparing omadacycline with existing antibiotics in the treatment of acute bacterial infections: a systematic review
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10678306/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2193
work_keys_str_mv AT fabarastephaniep 2577comparingomadacyclinewithexistingantibioticsinthetreatmentofacutebacterialinfectionsasystematicreview
AT alokakankcha 2577comparingomadacyclinewithexistingantibioticsinthetreatmentofacutebacterialinfectionsasystematicreview
AT padamsripal 2577comparingomadacyclinewithexistingantibioticsinthetreatmentofacutebacterialinfectionsasystematicreview
AT yanceyrobert 2577comparingomadacyclinewithexistingantibioticsinthetreatmentofacutebacterialinfectionsasystematicreview